Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Ananta

Channel

Ananta

@anantarpg

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

4,829subscribers

+13 since we began measuring on 26 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001921199426
TypeChannel
Username@anantarpg
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded26 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 September 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/anantarpg

Topic

Gaming — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 13 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

4,8164,8304,82326 August 2026 — 4,816 subscribers26 August 2026 — 4,820 subscribers30 August 2026 — 4,827 subscribers2 September 2026 — 4,828 subscribers7 September 2026 — 4,830 subscribers12 September 2026 — 4,827 subscribers15 September 2026 — 4,829 subscribers4,82926 August 202615 September 2026
7 measurements spanning 20 days, net +13. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,814–4,832 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Sept 2026, 11:594,829+2
12 Sept 2026, 05:574,827-3
7 Sept 2026, 15:384,830+2
2 Sept 2026, 08:034,828+1
30 Aug 2026, 06:124,827+7
26 Aug 2026, 20:264,820+4
26 Aug 2026, 14:454,816first reading

Engagement

8 posts held, back to 20 January 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
22.4%
avg views ÷ 4,829 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,080
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
13.6%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 8 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 August 2026
Posts held8 (20 January 202426 August 2026)
Views total2,164
Reactions total294
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken26 Aug 2026, 14:45 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
14m 03s
Average length
2m 21s

Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

3,816 reactions across 8 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥99126.0%
78720.6%
👍47612.5%
🎉41811.0%
🥰2897.57%
😁2666.97%
🤩2516.58%
👏2436.37%
❤‍🔥421.10%
👎150.393%
💘110.288%
🗿110.288%
😱60.157%
😐50.131%
🍾40.105%
🕊10.026%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,816 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 20 January 2024 to 26 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
81
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 8 we hold a reading for · 25%
Most on one post
76
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @anantarpg. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 8 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 20 January 2024 to 26 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

26 Aug 2026, 00:38 UTC914 views73 reactionsread 26 August 2026
Photo

Bilibili всё-таки не ошибся. ANANTA официально выйдет 15 января 2027 года — слив даты перед Gamescom оказался настоящим. И вместе с датой разработчики наконец подробнее объяснили, чем мы будем заниматься в их анимешной GTA. В игре будет два больших города — Nova City и Chongxiao. В новом городе заявлено больше сотни NPC со своими историями и заданиями: с ними можно знакомиться, развивать отношения и некоторых в ито

47🔥16❤‍🔥6🍾4

25 Aug 2026, 16:26 UTC≈1,250 views221 reactionsread 26 August 2026
Photo

Кажется, кто-то на Bilibili нажал «опубликовать» раньше времени Перед Gamescom в сети засветилась возможная дата релиза ANANTA — 15 января 2027 года. Её заметили на рекламном баннере Bilibili, но сами NetEase и Naked Rain пока ничего официально не подтвердили. Долго ждать проверки не придётся — сегодня ANANTA покажут на Gamescom Opening Night Live. Начало эфира — в 21:00 МСК. Точное время появления ANANTA внутри д

🎉83🔥35🥰31👏29🤩20👍19❤‍🔥21

21 Jan 2026, 08:02 UTC≈7,320 views213 reactions5 Starsread 26 August 2026
Video

Друзья, я немного пропал, но теперь снова с вами! Канал не мёртв, я вышел из техтеста, ща всё расскажу. Появились горячие сливки с проходящего техтеста с 16 по 20 января 2026 года — Сюжет и герои: в бетке есть ~5 глав сюжета, новые персонажи открываются по прогрессу (никаких гача-персов), главные герои — Тэффи (девочка-кролик) и Рише (полицейская). Бета-пролог занял около 30 мин, после чего даётся полная свобода.

🔥11030🎉24👏15👍10🤩10🥰8😱6

6 Jan 2025, 03:40 UTC≈21,300 views813 reactions76 Starsread 26 August 2026
Photo

Подъехали первые подробности с закрытого теста Ananta: - в игре на данный момент доступно 9 женских персонажей и 3 мужских; - большое количество активностей – можно сходить в зал, на пляж, позалипать на формы в магазине белья, угнать тачку и разнести полгорода, в том числе будет система свиданий (можно сводить тяночку) - карта похожа на Манхэттен из Spider-Man – по ней можно перемещаться на метро, либо «летать на

374🤩114🔥89👍86👏53🎉41🥰35❤‍🔥8

5 Dec 2024, 12:05 UTC≈20,900 views691 reactionsread 26 August 2026
Photo

GTA VI vs Ananta? Появились новые подробности об игре: - первое, это будет F2P RPG с открытым миром, поэтому без гача-элементов не обойтись, готовьтесь крутить; - а второе, можно будет ездить не только на тачке, но и на толчке. Даты релиза все еще нет, но уже открыта пре-регистрация на бета-тест на официальном сайте: anantagame.com GTA VI можно отменять

🔥255👍117101🎉79🤩52🥰36👏30❤‍🔥14

5 Dec 2024, 04:19 UTC≈17,300 views638 reactionsread 26 August 2026
Video

Naked Rain представили новый трейлер Ananta, но пока без даты релиза Скидываем корешу, пусть готовится

🔥21298👍96🥰88🤩54🎉49👏29❤‍🔥5

30 Nov 2024, 13:01 UTC≈15,300 views703 reactionsread 26 August 2026
Photo

АДМИН ВЫШЕЛ ИЗ РЕХАБА Naked Rain представили тизер, в котором раскрыли окончательное название Project Mugen - Ananta Разрабы обещают, что это будет масштабный проект, а через 5 дней представят новый трейлер Ananta, где игроки станут агентами A.C.D. в городской ролевой игры с открытым миром с сильным оттенком сверхъестественного Не ждем, а готовимся

🔥234😁107👍10085🎉67👏49🥰49❤‍🔥5

20 Jan 2024, 16:08 UTC≈25,900 views464 reactionsread 26 August 2026
Photo

Пока ждете Project Mugen в Steam творится полное безумие вокруг Palworld — «покемоны с пушками» обогнали по онлайну Доту, выше только CS2 Играем за «тренера покемонов», где путешествуем по миру, собираем покемонов, прокачиваем их и пристраиваем на работу в своём поселении, где они будут батрачить на фабриках, строить здания, собирать ресурсы, готовить и так далее, кроме того игру уже многие в сети критикуют за то, ч

😁159🎉7551👍48🥰42🔥40👏38👎8

Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @anantarpg. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Ananta” (@anantarpg), 4,829 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/anantarpg.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.