
Bot
анонимные вопросы🎀
@ananimnye_voprosy_bot
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Citations · Cite this entry
13,590monthly users
-1,134 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | 6548272915 |
|---|---|
| Type | Bot |
| Username | @ananimnye_voprosy_bot |
| First recorded | 18 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 32 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 8 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ananimnye_voprosy_bot |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 95% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Monthly users | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Nov 2026, 00:54 | 13,590 | +160 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 02:58 | 13,430 | +93 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 01:07 | 13,337 | -54 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 02:08 | 13,391 | -123 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 03:35 | 13,514 | -141 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 18:08 | 13,655 | +112 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 18:30 | 13,543 | +154 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 14:37 | 13,389 | -357 |
| 13 Oct 2026, 05:50 | 13,746 | +33 |
| 9 Oct 2026, 00:16 | 13,713 | +523 |
| 4 Oct 2026, 15:36 | 13,190 | -579 |
| 26 Sept 2026, 11:38 | 13,769 | -260 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 04:00 | 14,029 | -87 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 05:55 | 14,116 | +221 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 18:17 | 13,895 | -422 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 02:41 | 14,317 | -151 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 19:17 | 14,468 | -130 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 08:25 | 14,598 | -58 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 03:54 | 14,656 | -80 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 07:35 | 14,736 | first reading |
Engagement
No post feed to measure. Telegram publishes a readable post stream for channels, not for bots, so views, reactions and engagement rates do not exist for this entry — they are not missing, pending or withheld. The register records what this handle is and what it resolves to.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
@dndfjdhdhdhh · 1047 posts♱ ☨σɓɰαⲅα☨ ♱
@LoveNataliOreiro · 1636 postsD1skotzz Channel
@Ne_D1skotzz0_0 · 46 postsБудка Полинки
@Boodka · 15 postsМнение и карьера Салио
@SaliiyoCarrier · 15 postsВершинин — Владелец лиги U…
@AdrianVersh · 264 postsgospozha belka🐾
@St1DTzQrB39lMWJi · 3714 postsswxuu.
@alenkamypkaaa · 454 postsОкисляемся
@nekisli · 214 postsMarcy’s
@marcysardelaet · 2523 postssswerhl
@ssssm3yx · 53 postsподвал 🦾
@Free_TG_Stars2 · 1222 posts*+:。.。 Штабик Чосо 。.。:+*
@dom_cosplei1 · 102 postsdate
@oaoassst · 102 posts♡viktoria♡
@viktoriatavrel · 452 postsМнение Ярокса | и эго личность.
@YarooxxssMnenie · 11 postпредмет: чипсы
@balandajui · 51 postКаришка🎀🤍
@kariska · 121 postrussscvet
@masshakur · 3071 postave mawa
@mawa888888 · 2411 postmилкивэй💙
@milki_meowm · 51 post
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 39 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 23 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@NPLtransfers1 · 202 postsAraskul
@araskul · 1501 postB.LUMINARY༺
@be_luminary_by · 6,7291 postbio Shaikh
@bioShaikh · 681 postкурседы на вайбе
@crsdfmly1 postdasha.smarter
@dasha_smarter · 6211 postᶻ 𝘇 𐰁 А𝖗𝖎𝖘 𝕮𝖆𝖗𝖊𝖊𝖗𝄞
@EroldixAris · 141 post🕊️ Golubbokᵗʷᶦᶜʰ || Vtuber
@GolubbVtub · 131 post|INFO| ℑ𝔥𝔢 𝔩𝔬𝔰𝔱 𝔣𝔩𝔬𝔴𝔢𝔯
@INFOFLOODchess · 41 postinfo
@infonmbrs · 31 postало ало рб да да раздаю
@kamisha_rbx · 141 postинтимная исповедь𓋹
@Kikarimary · 221 postMolyu
@Mollyu1489 · 21 postкатейка
@mooooyt2 · 1,4211 post𝐛𝐢𝐨 𝐥𝐢𝐳𝐤𝐚𝐚
@mrmrxzxc · 11 postdate
@oaoassst · 101 postпрограмма луни.
@odalunyageniy · 51 postМнение и карьера Салио
@SaliiyoCarrier · 11 postsea_of_mia
@sea_of_mia · 51 post𝘿𝙧𝙖𝙘𝙤 𝙇𝙪𝙘𝙞𝙪𝙨 𝙈𝙖𝙡𝙛𝙤𝙮
@soulofdracomalfoy · 301 post︎ ︎ ︎ ᅠ
@sscsabaa · 191 postsswerhl
@ssssm3yx · 51 postTokio San...🫂
@tokio_saan · 11 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“анонимные вопросы🎀” (@ananimnye_voprosy_bot), 13,590 monthly users as measured 7 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ananimnye_voprosy_bot.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.