Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for TG拉群频道

Channel

TG拉群频道

@anandelaqunpindao

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

48subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003890960629
TypeChannel
Username@anandelaqunpindao
Created8 March 2026 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 October 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 7 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/anandelaqunpindao

Topic

Marketing & affiliate — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 29 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 41% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

475048.58 August 2026 — 47 subscribers10 August 2026 — 47 subscribers14 August 2026 — 48 subscribers12 September 2026 — 50 subscribers27 September 2026 — 48 subscribers488 August 202627 September 2026
5 measurements spanning 50 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 47–50 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
27 Sept 2026, 03:4148-2
12 Sept 2026, 23:5750+2
14 Aug 2026, 21:4348+1
10 Aug 2026, 13:4647no change
8 Aug 2026, 00:1847first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 8 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 29 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

5 reactions across 3 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 20.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤120.0%
🍌120.0%
👎120.0%
💩120.0%
🤮120.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 8 March 2026 to 29 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

29 Jul 2026, 14:30 UTC105 views1 reactionsread 10 August 2026

经过测试,分组开群比所有组同时开群的被封控概率小很多,每组控制在10个群以内,然后每组开炒时间错开10分钟,这样会减少被封控概率。

🍌1

22 Jun 2026, 12:15 UTC352 viewsread 10 August 2026

经过长期测试,对于炒兼职来说,IP,话术,任务链接,接粉用户名为重点风控对象,目前的风控不是以前的框架式风控,而是AI智能风控,根据标记以上说的几种条件来进行风控,所以需要客户们,自己形成不断更新的系统,坚持更换这些条件,是可以做到不封群的。

27 May 2026, 09:21 UTC522 viewsread 10 August 2026

印度100-200,巴西100,墨西哥100-200,直拉没问题了. 美国还是要灌粉。

25 May 2026, 07:03 UTC548 views3 reactionsread 10 August 2026

最近拉人的风控明显降低了,但是对炒群的要求还是比较高,之前拉30人的国家,现在能拉100-200人,但是炒群,还是不建议一台电脑放过多的管理和水军号,目前测试比较良性的配比为,管理号单独为一台电脑,水军号,最多5个号一台电脑,一台电脑炒1-3个群,这样可以有效减少封群情况,无论是管理号还是水军号,最好IP都是上在炒群的国家。

👎1💩1🤮1

19 Apr 2026, 06:47 UTC645 viewsread 10 August 2026

需要合作伙伴配合我们进行炒群测试,我这边是TG拉群机房,有5年拉群经验,接下来我们想要进入深度合作模式,需要找到合适的伙伴,能绝对信任我们且有一定的耐心,做深度合作,花大量时间进行测试,共同承担测试成本,突破成果仅与合作伙伴享有,合作目的不是为了承担测试成本,而是寻找值得合作的伙伴,一起突破,达到终极目的。

19 Apr 2026, 05:30 UTC554 viewsread 10 August 2026

目前TG的突破难点: 1直拉只能拉小群,变相导致盘口成本上涨,(这里主要是人工成本)但对于无法工作或者炒群就死来说已经是个不错的选择了。 2对于群的要求很高,盘口成本上涨。(权重越高的群,价格越贵) 3灌粉拉群会进入静音模式。 4测试5-10个群没问题,只要上量就会出现扫群。 5风控时间段影响增加,在当地国家火热的时间段,会出现扫群风控且随机性很强。 6大部分国家拉群都没问题,但是一旦炒群,群就会出现风控,这个已经有结论,就是风控机制已经进入3.0时代,而话术还在1.0,需要对话术进行升级。 7大部分盘口对于IP水军,管理,话术对封群的影响,了解还不够充分。 下步打算: 接下来,我们想要进入深度合作模式,需要找到合适的盘口,能绝对信任我们且有一定的耐心,做深度合作,花大量时间进行测试,共同承担测试成本,突破成果仅与合作伙伴享有,合作目的不是为了承担测试成本,而是寻找值得合作的伙伴,一起突破,达到终极目的——————————挣钱。

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @anandelaqunpindao. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“TG拉群频道” (@anandelaqunpindao), 48 subscribers as measured 27 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/anandelaqunpindao.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.