8 measurements spanning 6 days, net +15. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 10,525–10,549 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
13 Aug 2026, 02:45
10,546
+1
12 Aug 2026, 03:17
10,545
+5
11 Aug 2026, 06:31
10,540
+2
10 Aug 2026, 03:42
10,538
+7
9 Aug 2026, 04:12
10,531
+1
8 Aug 2026, 03:23
10,530
+2
7 Aug 2026, 01:54
10,528
-3
6 Aug 2026, 23:17
10,531
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 5 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 16 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
9.87%
avg views ÷ 10,546 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,040
7 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.367%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
7
of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 4 of 7 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 July 2026
Posts held
20 (5 June 2026 – 29 July 2026)
Views total
7,287
Reactions total
15
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
13 Aug 2026, 05:00 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈486
Videos
≈1,680
Links
≈281
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
30s
Average length
30s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
32 reactions across 10 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 56.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
18
56.3%
🔥
9
28.1%
👏
3
9.38%
👍
1
3.13%
🤔
1
3.13%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 32reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 5 June 2026 to 29 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🏆 مسابقة سؤال المحترف | INZO 🏆
📚 تحرص INZO على نشر محتوى توعوي يساعد المتداولين على اتخاذ قرارات أكثر وعيًا وإدارة مخاطرهم باحترافية.
🎁 الجائزة:
30$ لفائزين اثنين فقط.
❓ سؤال المسابقة:
بالعودة إلى فيديو INZO المنشور على فيسبوك بتاريخ 23/7، ما السؤال الصعب الذي ذكرتْه مقدّمة الفيديو، والذي يجب على كل متداول أن يطرحه على نفسه قبل التفكير في الربح؟
📝 كيفية المشاركة:
يجب أن يحتوي تعليقك على:
• إجابتك على السؤال.
• اسمك ا…
مسابقة جديدة من شركة إنزو للتداول 🏆
💳 توفر منصة P2P في INZO تجربة إيداع وسحب تجمع بين السرعة، الأمان، والمرونة لتناسب احتياجات المتداولين.
💰 الجائزة: 30$ لفائزين اثنين فقط.
40% بونص إيداع لفائز واحد فقط.
❓ سؤال المسابقة:
ما أكثر شيء أعجبك في التعامل مع منصة P2P؟ وما الميزة التي جعلتها خيارك المفضل؟
📝 كيفية المشاركة:
ضع تعليقك على منشور المسابقة بالقناة باستخدام حسابك الشخصي على تليجرام.
يجب أن ي…
كل ما تحتاجه لتبدأ وتنجح في التداول... في مكان واحد!
في إنزو، جمعنا لك كل الأدوات والخدمات التي يبحث عنها المتداول المحترف والمبتدئ:
تنفيذ سريع وشفاف بنظام STP
منصّتان احترافيتان للتداول MT5 / CTrader
دعم فني متوفر 24/6 واستجابة خلال أقل من 10 ثوانٍ
خدمة نسخ احترافية بتحكم كامل باستراتيجيتك
طرق إيداع وسحب متعددة (عالمية ومحلية)
عمليات سحب فورية خلال دقائق
ماذا تنتظر؟ قم بفتح الحساب الان وتداول كالأسطورة.
https://in…
🏆 نجم المباراة... فريق الدعم الفني! ⭐
كما أن لكل فريق لاعبًا يصنع الفارق في اللحظات الحاسمة، فإن فريق الدعم الفني في INZO يقف إلى جانبك عندما تحتاج إليه.
💰 الجائزة: 30$ لفائز واحد فقط.
40% بونص إيداع لفائز واحد فقط.
❓ سؤال المسابقة:
لو كان الدعم الفني لاعبًا في فريقك… ما تقييمك لأدائه؟
شاركنا تجربتك مع فريق دعم INZO وأخبرنا:
⚡ ما أسرع موقف حصلت فيه على مساعدة من فريق الدعم؟
💎 ما الميزة التي جعلت…
💡 لماذا يُعد نظام STP الخيار الأمثل لك كمتداول؟
الإجابة ببساطة تكمن في نقطتين أساسيتين:
⚡️ تنفيذ فائق السرعة
أوامر التداول تُنقل مباشرة من المتداول إلى مزودي السيولة في السوق دون تنفيذ داخلي، مما يضمن تنفيذًا لحظيًا دون تأخير أو إعادة تسعير.
🛡 شفافية وحماية كاملة
يتم تنفيذ الصفقات تلقائيًا دون أي تدخل بشري، لتضمن تجربة تداول نزيهة خالية من تضارب المصالح.
تداول مع إنزو
الوسيط STP الأكثر ثقة وموثوقية في الشرق الأو…
مسابقة كأس العالم 2026 من INZO
توقع طرفي نهائي كأس العالم 2026، وقد تكون أحد الفائزين بجائزة نقدية بقيمة 1,000 دولار.
تمنح INZO عشرة فائزين فرصة الفوز بمبلغ 1,000 دولار لكل فائز، بإجمالي جوائز يصل إلى 10,000 دولار.
طريقة المشاركة:
✅ تابع صفحة INZO
✅ اضغط إعجاب على منشور المسابقة
✅ اكتب توقعك لطرفي النهائي في التعليقات
✅ أرفق رقم حسابك في INZO داخل نفس التعليق
🛑 تنبيه مهم:
المشاركة تُعتمد من خلال التعليق على منشور ف…
مسابقة جديدة من شركة إنزو للتداول 🏆
📢 تشهد الأسواق المالية أحياناً أحداثاً وتصريحات اقتصادية مهمة قد تؤثر بشكل كبير على حركة الأسعار خلال دقائق معدودة.
💰 الجائزة: 30$ لفائزين اثنين فقط.
❓ سؤال المسابقة:
تخيّل أن الرئيس الأميركي السابق Donald Trump سيُلقي تصريحاً اقتصادياً مهماً خلال ساعة واحدة فقط!
أنت متداول ذكي وتستخدم خدمات INZO، فما أول خطوة ستقوم بها قبل فتح أي صفقة؟
🔴 الدخول مباشرةً إلى السوق دون متابعة ال…
امنح رأس مالك مرونة أكبر في السوق واجعل إيداعك يمنحك قيمة أقوى 💪📊
لماذا تكتفي بالقيمة الأساسية لإيداعك بينما يمكنك الحصول على قوة تداولية إضافية🚀
من خلال بونص الإيداع بنسبة 30% من INZO 🎁
مع كل مبلغ تقرر استثماره يتحول فوراً إلى ميزة تنافسية أكبر في حسابك 🔥
🔗 بادر الان بفتح حسابك اليوم واستفد من الدعم الإضافي لبونص الايداع لتتداول بكفاءة أكبر ⚡️
انـزو – حيث تلتقي الثقة بالاحترافية 🤝
https://inzo.co/ar/home
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @analyzer_omar1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 801,714 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
معارف - مصادر تعليمية في كل المجالات @m3aarf · 337,491 Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 10 August 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“كورسات تداول مجاني” (@analyzer_omar1), 10,546 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/analyzer_omar1.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.