2 measurements spanning 4 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 18–20 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
11 Aug 2026, 17:31
19
no change
7 Aug 2026, 15:32
19
first reading
Engagement
5 posts held, back to 10 May 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 5 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 January 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Photos
162
Videos
25
Links
18
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
1m 45s
Average length
35s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
49 reactions across 5 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
23
46.9%
🔥
13
26.5%
👍
9
18.4%
🎄
1
2.04%
👀
1
2.04%
🕊
1
2.04%
😍
1
2.04%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 5 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 49 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 5 most recent posts we hold, published 10 May 2025 to 7 January 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Вчера получила свой рождественский подарочек) ✨
Случилась очередная публикация - Quadro Magazine взял серию моих работ, и на этот раз мне захотелось увидеть их в осязаемом формате. И вот - печатная версия уже у меня! 👏👏👏
Team credits
Ph @an_tishina_art
Md @hoope.br
Md @cate.alex
Muah @margarita_perfilieva
Muah @barkovskaya_makeup
Loc @whitestudios
Total looks by @generalsix brand
Via @officialkavyar
2025-й
я скорее рада, что он заканчивается, мой самый эмоционально сложный год, с максимальным диапазоном эмоций - от эйфории ввиду значимых приобретений, нового опыта и превосходящих ожидания успехов, до самой удушающей грусти от потерь близких…
Но как известно, испытания даются по силам, закаляют и делают сильнее.
Я желаю каждому верить в себя, не терять присутствия духа несмотря ни на какие трудности, они неизбе…
📆 12 июля отмечается день фотографа))
А я про фотографию и творчество в целом забыла напрочь, попав в нескончаемый водоворот бытовых задач глобальной для меня важности 🫥
Испытываю по этому поводу легкую тоску, на глубокую грусть времени нет)
Но я обязательно вернусь в строй (как минимум надо бы распотрошить фотоархивы), а пока можно поздравить меня своим сердечком 🫶
🎤🎤🎤
Завтра 24/05 в студии Mayak пройдет масштабное мероприятие для фотографов Portfolio Party 2025. Уже второй год подряд его проводят совместно Getlens и Wfolio.
Будут лекции, мк, фотозоны и… дикие очереди из фанатов фотографии в залы и прочие локации, ведь этот фест (сложно в это поверить) абсолютно бесплатный)) 🆓
Честно говоря, в прошлом году темы у спикеров и на практику были как-будто актуальнее, интереснее, но…
Профессия фотографа дает возможность знакомится с потрясающе талантливыми и красивыми во всех смыслах людьми 🤩🤩🤩
Это наша вторая съемка с Вероникой @atelier_dmitrieva (к первой вернусь позже, покажу 🫡). Вероника конструирует и безупречно создает своими руками сложнейшие вечерние платья и корсеты, да она и сама - образец роскошества! 😍
👍4🔥3❤1😍1
Showing the 5 most recent of 5 posts we hold for @an_tishina_art_official. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
5
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
5
vacant every time we have ever looked
@an_tishina_art_official named 5 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@barkovskaya_makeup named in 1 post, 12 August 2026 – 12 August 2026
@margarita_perfilieva named in 1 post, 12 August 2026 – 12 August 2026
@officialkavyar named in 1 post, 12 August 2026 – 12 August 2026
@ohthatpersy named in 1 post, 12 August 2026 – 12 August 2026
@whitestudios named in 1 post, 12 August 2026 – 12 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Узница кадров 🎬📸” (@an_tishina_art_official), 19 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/an_tishina_art_official.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.