Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 3 PM

Channel

3 PM

@ampmby

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

1,449subscribers

-10 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001376109760
TypeChannel
Username@ampmby
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live27 August 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 27 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/ampmby

Growth

1,4491,4591,4547 August 2026 — 1,459 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,459 subscribers14 August 2026 — 1,457 subscribers17 August 2026 — 1,455 subscribers20 August 2026 — 1,453 subscribers24 August 2026 — 1,451 subscribers27 August 2026 — 1,449 subscribers7 August 202627 August 2026
7 measurements spanning 20 days, net -10. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,448–1,461 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
27 Aug 2026, 06:541,449-2
24 Aug 2026, 08:571,451-2
20 Aug 2026, 10:021,453-2
17 Aug 2026, 14:261,455-2
14 Aug 2026, 13:061,457-2
7 Aug 2026, 22:011,459no change
7 Aug 2026, 17:281,459first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 6 August 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

200 reactions across 19 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥7638.0%
👍5527.5%
4824.0%
😁84.00%
🤪31.50%
👌21.00%
😱21.00%
👏10.5%
👨‍💻10.5%
💩10.5%
🤔10.5%
🤬10.5%
🫡10.5%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 200reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2025 to 7 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
7
across the posts below
Posts paid on
5
of 19 we hold a reading for · 26%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ampmby. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 6 August 2025 to 7 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

7 Jul 2026, 15:06 UTC484 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026

​​​​Всем привет! С вами Алексей Минкевич. Люблю, когда заканчивается большой кусок работы =) Всю зиму я переписывал свой курс по управлению проектами под свежий PMBOK 8 (там правда многое поменялось к лучшему). А весной и в начале лета мы вместе с SoftTeco сделали из него полноценную онлайн-версию. И вот — он готов и ждёт вас 🎉 👉 Почитать подробнее и оставить заявку: ampm.by 👉 Оплатить подписку и начать учиться: pros

7👍4

14 May 2026, 15:37 UTC841 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Всем привет! А вот, на следующей неделе будет интересный мастер-класс “Синдром Атланта”, онлайн и офлайн в Минске, для PM, PO, teamlead. Подробнее по ссылке: https://t.me/hr_kuluar/702

👍2👨‍💻1🔥1

28 Apr 2026, 09:44 UTC943 views14 reactions2 Starsread 7 August 2026

Всем большое спасибо! Набор окончен. Дам знать, как курс будет готов к выходу в паблик. Прекрасного вам дня!

🔥86

28 Apr 2026, 09:04 UTC915 views19 reactions2 Starsread 7 August 2026

Всем привет! С вами Алексей Минкевич. Я заканчиваю работу над онлайн-версией курса «Управление проектами» обновленного по PMBOK® Guide 8th Edition. Подробнее можно посмотреть тут: https://ampm.by/. В конце Мая будет запуск для всех, а перед этим хочу обкатать курс на действующих РП. Ищу 5 опытных РП, готовых пройти курс бесплатно. Что вы получите: • полный доступ к курсу на 3 недели (видеолекции, практика, шаблоны

🔥15👍31

27 Nov 2025, 15:46 UTC≈1,280 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026

По мотивам статьи Jurgen Appelo “The Agentic Organization: Building AI Highways to Bypass Human Traffic Jams” Оригинал: https://substack.com/home/post/p-180101556 Юрген Аппело очень метко описывает знакомую всем ситуацию: компании гордо заявляют, что «используют ИИ», но в реальности их процессы похожи на перуанские трассы, которые внезапно превращаются в городские улочки. Весь поток идет через центр, что тормозит пр

4👌2

17 Nov 2025, 07:35 UTC≈1,110 views8 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026
Photo

Всем хорошей недели 🤖

😁8

14 Nov 2025, 19:01 UTC≈2,040 views5 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026

Неожиданные новости из PMI: PMBOK Guide 8 уже вышел 🎉 PMI внезапно выкатил PMBOK Guide 8th Edition, и он уже доступен для скачивания на официальном сайте PMI: pmi.org/standards/pmbok. Главное: экзамен PMP обновится в июле 2026 года. Это значит, что есть комфортный запас времени, чтобы спокойно сдать экзамен в более предсказуемой среде.

5

31 Oct 2025, 08:02 UTC≈1,630 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026

PMBOK 8: что на самом деле изменилось PMI объявил дату выхода восьмого издания PMBOK® Guide - 13 января 2026 года. 💡 Новый баланс PMBOK 8 объединяет лучшее из двух миров: процессную чёткость шестого издания и ценностный подход седьмого. Теперь принципы задают направление, а процессы помогают это направление удерживать. 📏 Меньше принципов, больше процессов Принципов стало шесть вместо двенадцати. Зато без повторов

👍21🔥1

29 Oct 2025, 08:03 UTC972 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Где мы не угадали с восьмым PMBOK Когда мы писали в книге про возможные изменения в восьмой версии, то кое-в чём промахнулись. 🖥️ Мы ожидали цифрового «портала», а получили бумажную книгу Мы предполагали, что PMBOK 8 станет по сути интерфейсом к PMIstandards+, а основное содержимое переедет онлайн. На деле же PMI вернулся к классическому формату — полноценное печатное издание со структурой, таблицами и понятной ло

👍92

27 Oct 2025, 08:01 UTC779 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Наши прогнозы и попадания Когда мы писали главу «Эволюция PMBOK», предположили, что PMI вернёт баланс между принципами и процессами. 🎯 Угадали: Focus Areas стали тем самым мостом между системностью шестой версии и философией седьмой. Также оправдались наши ожидания: 🌍 расширение темы value delivery — теперь отдельный раздел; 🌱 интеграция устойчивого развития — новый принцип Integrate Sustainability Within All Proj

👍2

23 Oct 2025, 13:05 UTC897 views15 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Что изменилось и куда движется PMI 📘 PMBOK 6 (2017) — классика: 49 процессов, 10 областей знаний, фокус на входы-инструменты-выходы. 📗 PMBOK 7 (2021) — революция: отказ от процессов, 12 принципов и 8 доменов производительности. 📙 PMBOK 8 (2026) — синтез. Возвращаются Process Groups, но теперь как Focus Areas. Добавлены 7 Performance Domains и около 40 обновлённых процессов. Главное — не структура, а смысл: гибрид

🔥10👍32

21 Oct 2025, 10:26 UTC828 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026

✳️ Не так давно стала известна дата выхода восьмого издания PMI PMBOK®: 13 января 2026 года В нашей книге мы как раз писали, чего ожидать от новой версии и вот теперь можно проверить, какие предположения оправдались. PMBOK 8 — не просто обновление, а шаг к новой логике проектного управления. PMI называет его самым evidence-based изданием: 48 000 datapoints, отзывы практиков с пяти континентов и два раунда открытого

🔥6🤪3👍1😱1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ampmby. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

6 Aug 2025, 14:03 UTCAnonymous Quiz193 voters

Что из перечисленного НЕ является частью плана управления содержанием проекта?

  1. Создание иерархической структуры работ.16%
  2. Поддержание и одобрение ИСР.19%
  3. Определение правильности результатов поставки.40%
  4. Контроль обработки запросов на изменения.25%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2025 to 7 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“3 PM” (@ampmby), 1,449 subscribers as measured 27 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ampmby.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.