Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

آموزش نویسندگی آلفا

@amozshalpha

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

2,370subscribers

+4 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001897993303
TypeChannel
Username@amozshalpha
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/amozshalpha

Growth

2,3652,3762,370.56 August 2026 — 2,366 subscribers7 August 2026 — 2,365 subscribers9 August 2026 — 2,376 subscribers12 August 2026 — 2,370 subscribers2,3706 August 202612 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 6 days, net +4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,363–2,378 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 18:282,370-6
9 Aug 2026, 21:312,376+11
7 Aug 2026, 03:002,365-1
6 Aug 2026, 23:322,366first reading

Engagement

21 posts held, back to 10 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
22.6%
avg views ÷ 2,370 subscribers
Avg views / post
536
14 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.12%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
14
of 21 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held21 (10 July 20267 August 2026)
Views total7,499
Reactions total84
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 16:38 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

120 reactions across 21 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
5041.7%
😍2016.7%
💔1210.0%
🔥119.17%
🥰108.33%
😨86.67%
😁43.33%
👏21.67%
🙏21.67%
🤯10.833%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 21 of the 21 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 120reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 10 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 13:08 UTC60 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026

دیالوگ بعدیش و تو برام بنویس! 《چراآخرین تماس مقتول با شماره شما بوده؟ 》 -من..... #تمرین

1🔥1

2 Aug 2026, 18:41 UTC251 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026

|■از کجا بفهمیم ایده کشش ندارد؟ •• اولین نشانه این است که بعد از تعریف کردن ایده، مخاطب سؤال مهمی نمی‌پرسد. اگر هیچ کنجکاوی ایجاد نشود، احتمالاً ایده هنوز جان نگرفته است. •• نشانه دوم این است که ایده فقط یک موقعیت را توصیف می‌کند. مثلاً می‌گویید: «مردی حافظه‌اش را از دست داده است.» این یک موقعیت است. اما هنوز داستان نیست. باید بدانیم این اتفاق چه بحرانی ایجاد می‌کند. •• نشانه سوم این است که شخصیت می‌تواند خیلی راح

6

30 Jul 2026, 19:02 UTC437 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026

انسان می‌تواند از خیلی چیزها دل بکند، خیلی از آدم‌ها را فراموش کند و از خیلی آدم‌ها هم فرار کند! حتی چیزهایی که زمانی فکر می‌کرد تمام زندگی‌اش به آن‌ها گره خورده است را هم در گردوغبار روزگار، گم خواهد کرد. اما انسان هیچ‌وقت نمی‌تواند از خودش فاصله بگیرد، هیچ‌وقت نمی‌تواند از خودش فرار کند. هر جا برود، باید خودش را با خودش ببرد، با تمام خاطره‌ها، تصمیم‌ها، اشتباه‌ها و چیزهایی که هنوز در درونش حل نشده‌اند. شاید به همین

11👏2

30 Jul 2026, 10:46 UTC410 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026

☘☘برای ارتباط مستقیم بامن این آیدی منه پیام بدید چون خیلی‌ها گفته بودید توی ناشناس من اینجام عزیزای دلم😍👇 @Icenoun0024

😍4

29 Jul 2026, 14:15 UTC426 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026

کتاب ها نظر سنجی شدناااا🥰☝🏻

😍4

28 Jul 2026, 06:13 UTC491 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026

سلاااام میخوام پادکست بذارم بهم بگو کجاا مشکل داری کامنت کن بذارمش😍❤️

😍6

27 Jul 2026, 14:39 UTC530 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026

۵ نکته برای نوشتن سوگ🩶🕯 •[📚]• مقدمه 📘|• سوگ یکی از عمیق‌ترین و حساس‌ترین احساسات انسان‌هاست. وقتی شخصیت‌های ما عزادارن، وسط یک کشمکش درونی گیر افتادن و دارن با یک فقدان بزرگ کنار میان. انگار وجودشون زیر و رو شده و تعادلشون به هم خورده. این آشفتگی درونی جایی برای پردازش داستانه. 📗|• اما چطور این تجربه‌ی پیچیده و شخصی رو روایت کنیم، بدون اینکه توی باتلاق اغراق و کلیشه بیفتیم؟ •[📚]• یک: از ته دل تا آخرش برو. 📒|• بخش غ

5

26 Jul 2026, 05:05 UTC517 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026

ببین منو یه گروه همخوانی کتاب آوردم که معرکه‌اس کلی دوست کتابخون اونجا پیدا می‌کنی... کلی کتاب می‌خونید و درموردش صحبت می‌کنید تازههه نقدم میشه و از نکاتش استفاده می‌کنی دیگه چی می‌خوای ؟ روند گروه چجوریه؟ بیا بهت بگم اول همه نظرات و پیشنهاداتشونو میدن و بعد همش نظرسنجی میشه کتابی که بیشترین رای رو کسب کنه به عنوان کتاب منتخب تعیین میشه و پروفایل اسم گروه به نامش تغییر می‌کنه انگار هربار یه گروه جدید داری😎🔥 https://

😍21🥰1

25 Jul 2026, 07:29 UTC606 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Poll

📚✒️کدام مورد بیشترین صدمه را به تعلیق و کشش داستان وارد می‌کند؟

  1. 📚پنهان کردن اطلاعات از شخصیت های داستان21%
  2. ✒️پنهان کردن اطلاعات از خوانندگان28%
  3. 📚پاسخ دادن به سوالات دراماتیک42%
  4. ✒️دیرمعرفی کردن ضد قهرمان25%

The shares total 116%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

4

21 Jul 2026, 05:27 UTC718 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026

دیالوگ بعدیش و تو برام بنویس! «اگه واقعاً بی‌گناهی، چرا سه روز فرار کردی؟» _فرار کردم چون .... #تمرین

7

20 Jul 2026, 06:24 UTC735 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
File

لطفااا آگاه باشید☘☘ نذارید ازتون سوءاستفاده کنن برای قوی کردن رزومه خودشون که بگن بهشون سرپرست نویسندگان!

🙏21

20 Jul 2026, 06:23 UTC712 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

در تعجبم که چطور یه سری به اصطلاح اساتید این ظلم به بچه‌ها می‌کنن!!! یعنی چی اگه قلم خوبی هم نداری چاپ کن😶

😨8

Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @amozshalpha. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

25 Jul 2026, 07:29 UTCAnonymous Poll53 voters

📚✒️کدام مورد بیشترین صدمه را به تعلیق و کشش داستان وارد می‌کند؟

  1. 📚پنهان کردن اطلاعات از شخصیت های داستان21%
  2. ✒️پنهان کردن اطلاعات از خوانندگان28%
  3. 📚پاسخ دادن به سوالات دراماتیک42%
  4. ✒️دیرمعرفی کردن ضد قهرمان25%

The shares total 116%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 10 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 183,220 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 41 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

“𝖤𝖽𝗂𝗍𝗂𝗇𝗀 𝖡𝗅𝗎𝖾„
@Editing_Blue · 13,545
11 posts
باغ سبز مولانا / زهرا غریبیان
@gharibianlavasanii · 17,252
4 posts
دورنمای اقتصاد
@econviews · 18,203
3 posts
تقویت (مکالمه) با کارتون های 8 دقیقه ای سان شاین
@EnglishCartoonn2024 · 22,777
3 posts
👑novin.english👑
@novinenglish_new · 13,502
3 posts
مدرسه نویسندگی آناهل
@anahelanjoman · 6,532
2 posts
𝑨𝒑𝒑𝒛_𝒌𝒂𝒎𝒚𝒂𝒃 | برنامه های کمیاب
@appz_kamyab · 20,563
2 posts
🌸آرامش با داستان🌸
@arameshbadastan · 9,920
2 posts
دیر بوک
@DeyrBook · 14,396
2 posts
کاغذِ خط‌خطی (داستان-رمان)
@fiction_12 · 7,604
2 posts
همســفر بـا ماه
@hamsafarbamah · 9,152
2 posts
کانال تبادلات بی نهایت
@infinite_tab · 265
2 posts
「 آنک 」
@its_anak · 17,802
2 posts
جعلیات ادبی
@jaliateadabi · 4,236
2 posts
کتابخانه ادبی
@ketabkhaneadabi1398 · 7,248
2 posts
مریم گاردن
@MaryamGarden · 4,203
2 posts
Maryam team
@MaryamTeam · 4,605
2 posts
روانشناسی و پزشکی
@matlabravanshenasi · 22,650
2 posts
مدرسه ی زبان، مکالمه و موسیقی
@RealEnConversations · 16,692
2 posts
شـ؏ــر ســـریــــرا
@seda_tanha · 7,934
2 posts
شـ؏ـر و مشـاعـره
@sher_moshaer · 8,165
2 posts
نردبان نور✨
@shine41 · 5,050
2 posts
🍀زیبایی های آفرینش🍀
@stiiiiicker · 13,420
2 posts
دکوراسیون حرفه ای منزل رو رایگان یاد بگیر
@ZibaManzel · 12,323
2 posts

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“آموزش نویسندگی آلفا” (@amozshalpha), 2,370 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/amozshalpha.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.