Channel
@amozeshe_adminii
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
1,334subscribers
-9 since we began measuring on 12 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001877491937 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @amozeshe_adminii |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/amozeshe_adminii |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 13:41 | 1,334 | -2 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 16:17 | 1,336 | -7 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 05:22 | 1,343 | no change |
| 12 Sept 2026, 04:47 | 1,343 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 15 October 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 22 October 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
6 reactions across 3 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 66.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 4 | 66.7% | |
| ❤ | 2 | 33.3% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 15 October 2025 to 22 October 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
یه شب مهمون داشتیم کفش ها توی حیاط جفت شده بود همشون مرتب بودن به جز یک کفش که پاشنه هاش خوابونده شده بود. هر کس میخواست بیاد تو حیاط اون کفش ها رو میپوشید. میدونی چرا؟ چون پاشنه هاش خوابونده شده بود! یه کم که فکر کردم دیدم بعضی از ما آدم ها مثل همین کفش های پاشنه خوابونده هستیم برامون مهم نیست کی سوارمون میشه یادت باشه که اگر سر خم کنی اگر خودت به خودت احترام نذاری اگر ضعیف باشی همه میخوان ازت سواری بگیرن و کسی هم …
👍4
Video, posted without a caption
پس جمعبندی کنیم 😏 🎬 سناریو + ادیت = ترکیب انفجاری برای وایرال شدن 💬 حالا تو تجربه خودت چی میگه؟ کدومش تو محتوات بیشتر تاثیر گذاشته؟ ریپلای بده و داستانت رو بهمون بگو 💥
💡 نکته حرفهای: هر چی سناریو و ایده قویتر باشه، حتی یه ادیت ساده هم جواب میده ولی بدون ایده، ادیت قوی هم معمولاً فقط خوشگل به نظر میاد، وایرال نمیشه 😎
سوال عملی 😏 تو آخرین ویدیو یا محتوایی که دیدی، کدومش بیشتر تو چشم زد؟ ادیت فوقالعاده یا سناریوی جذاب؟ 🎬 تو کامنت بهمون بگو 👇
پس اگه دنبال وایرال شدن واقعی هستی، هم ایده بده هم خوب ادیت کن 💪 نه فقط یکی از اینا!
✨ سناریو یعنی داستانی که مخاطب رو نگه میداره ادیت یعنی روش ارائه و جذاب کردن همون داستان هر دو مکمل هم هستن، نه رقیب هم 😎
🎯 یادت باشه، محتوا بدون قصه و ایده خوب مثل یه ماشین بدون سوخته 🚗💨 ممکنه ظاهرش جذاب باشه ولی هیچ جایی نمیره 😏
🗣️ بیتعارف بگو… تو خودت کدومطرفی؟ ✅ طرفدار ادیت هستی؟ ✅ یا طرفدار سناریو؟ (ریپلای بده تا نظر جمع رو ببینیم)
یا یه سناریوی فوقالعاده قوی داشته باشیم ولی ادیت درست و جذاب نداشته باشه، شانسی برای دیده شدن داره؟ 😅
❤1
مثلاً یه ویدیو خوشادیت و قشنگ داشته باشیم ولی پشتش سناریو قوی نداشته باشه، باز هم میتونه وایرال بشه؟ 🤔
❤1
💬 یه سوال جدی 😏 به نظرت توی رشد پیج و وایرال شدن محتوا، ادیت مهمتره یا سناریو؟ 🎬 بیتعارف جواب بده!
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @amozeshe_adminii. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“آموزش رایگان ادمینی و اینستگرام فاطمه حسینی” (@amozeshe_adminii), 1,334 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/amozeshe_adminii.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.