Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 𝐀𝐌𝐎𝐑𝐀𝐍𝐓

Channel

𝐀𝐌𝐎𝐑𝐀𝐍𝐓

@amorantKf

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

294subscribers

+3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002269615015
TypeChannel
Username@amorantKf
Created4 February 2025measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live24 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 24 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/amorantKf

Growth

2802942877 August 2026 — 291 subscribers7 August 2026 — 288 subscribers8 August 2026 — 288 subscribers15 August 2026 — 280 subscribers24 August 2026 — 294 subscribers7 August 202624 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 16 days, net +3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 278–296 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
24 Aug 2026, 00:08294+14
15 Aug 2026, 10:18280-8
8 Aug 2026, 08:18288no change
7 Aug 2026, 21:01288-3
7 Aug 2026, 14:55291first reading

Engagement

4 posts held, back to 4 February 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 4 posts for this entry, the most recent from 21 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

192 reactions across 3 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 53.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥10253.1%
custom 53818449553522982802412.5%
custom 5280510935784509469189.38%
custom 5215543224650715137115.73%
custom 5217849274196324122105.21%
custom 521562676176462261763.13%
custom 523137772539401455252.60%
custom 523110446668974080042.08%
custom 528082572682253660231.56%
custom 529214622123270392531.56%
custom 527602775013671205521.04%
custom 527847366529230234321.04%
custom 529874280137310391421.04%

Custom emoji. 12 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 4 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 192reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 4 most recent posts we hold, published 4 February 2025 to 21 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

21 Jul 2026, 10:35 UTC232 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026

@podslyshaAmorant_bot - подслушка аморанта @podsleshaAmoranta - канал подслушки

custom 52155432246507151375custom 52156267617646226172custom 52311044666897408002custom 52784736652923023432

Signed افتدى من قبلكMR

24 Apr 2026, 21:25 UTC≈1,280 views13 reactionsread 8 August 2026

гайсы. напоминаю, что у нас есть инициалы (по желанию). Угомон словили, никто заставлять вас их ставить не будет, но если есть желание: Amrt / Amo

custom 52313777253940145525custom 52155432246507151373custom 52156267617646226173custom 52311044666897408002

Signed dv افتدى من قبلك

4 Feb 2025, 16:17 UTC≈6,260 views168 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

⭐️⭐️⭐️ 𝑪𝑯𝑨𝑻🌙 ⭐️ ⭐️Конференция Amorant для персон ⭐️Скз. Нотвирт и другое летят мимо ⛔ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ ⭐️👹𝐀𝐃𝐌𝐈𝐍𝐈𝐒𝐓𝐑𝐀𝐓𝐈𝐎𝐍 👹 𝐓𝐈𝐊𝐓𝐎𝐊 👹 𝐑𝐄𝐒𝐓 👹 𝐏𝐀𝐓𝐄𝐍𝐓 👹 𝐑𝐔𝐋𝐄𝐒

🔥102custom 538184495535229828024custom 528051093578450946918custom 521784927419632412210custom 52155432246507151373custom 52808257268225366023custom 52921462212327039253custom 52760277501367120552

Showing the 4 most recent of 4 posts we hold for @amorantKf. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“𝐀𝐌𝐎𝐑𝐀𝐍𝐓” (@amorantKf), 294 subscribers as measured 24 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/amorantKf.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.