Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

[РЕСТ] amneza[16+]

@amnezaaa

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

293subscribers

+2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002796588009
TypeChannel
Username@amnezaaa
CreatedBetween 1 June 2025 and 30 September 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/amnezaaa

Growth

2912932926 August 2026 — 291 subscribers6 August 2026 — 291 subscribers7 August 2026 — 292 subscribers14 August 2026 — 293 subscribers6 August 202614 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 7 days, net +2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 291–293 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 00:25293+1
7 Aug 2026, 06:43292+1
6 Aug 2026, 22:48291no change
6 Aug 2026, 13:03291first reading

Engagement

14 posts held, back to 2 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
26.7%
avg views ÷ 293 subscribers
Avg views / post
78.3
14 posts measured
Reaction rate
13.5%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
14
of 14 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held14 (2 August 20266 August 2026)
Views total1,096
Reactions total148
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 22:48 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

148 reactions across 14 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 52379475392982208606040.5%
custom 53258851220780743553624.3%
2214.9%
custom 5442826661957497694138.78%
custom 5442871698984562549106.76%
🍓74.73%

Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 148reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 19:49 UTC33 views7 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🥰 на удивление он мне пока что нравится☕️☕️☕️ ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ ⭐⭐⭐⭐ @amnezaaa она не искала легких путей(его профиль) у него уже есть пара интересных фактов🫣 УПД РЕБЯТ ЭТО МОЙ НОВЫЙ ПЕРС НАСКЕТЧЕН ,А НЕ ЛАПОЧКА НА ВТОРОМ ФОТО🌟

custom 54428716989845625494custom 53258851220780743552custom 52379475392982208601

6 Aug 2026, 18:30 UTC31 views8 reactionsread 6 August 2026

3 пункт почти завершен🥰 осталось только закрасить хотите увидеть промежуточный результат?😊 🩷 - да,скидывай сейчас 🌟 - не,дорисовывай полностью час вам на решение🥰

custom 52379475392982208608

6 Aug 2026, 14:01 UTC50 views8 reactionsread 6 August 2026

мне вырубили свет,моюильный очень плохо ловит,я пропадаю 🤩 упд(18:02):ураааа над нами сжалились и дали свет спустя 1 час ,а не 3🥰

custom 52379475392982208608

6 Aug 2026, 13:49 UTC51 views8 reactionsread 6 August 2026

я ,видимо,сегодня без света 😢 у меня ахиреть как молния громко ебнула и рядом с моим домом

custom 52379475392982208607custom 54428266619574976941

5 Aug 2026, 22:44 UTC65 views7 reactionsread 6 August 2026

не,я не буду его доделывать,мне впадлу и все не нравится 😢

🍓3custom 544282666195749769421custom 53258851220780743551

5 Aug 2026, 01:28 UTC80 views10 reactionsread 6 August 2026

поздравьте карлли со старением на год пожалуйста 🌟🌟

custom 523794753929822086071custom 53258851220780743551custom 54428266619574976941

5 Aug 2026, 01:28 UTC77 views13 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @carllieeeePhoto

‼️‼️‼️ а вот и у меня наступило день рождения 😋😋 я постарела ещё на год, теперь мне 16 (блин) по традиции, хорошим подарком для художника будет репост его работ в свои соцсети пж для донатов ещё не выросла я 😢 если надо будет: анонка лс @l7lmarchikk

11custom 53258851220780743551custom 54428266619574976941

4 Aug 2026, 12:19 UTC74 views6 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @SHITpost_amnezaaaPhoto

нахуй надо

6

3 Aug 2026, 19:38 UTC94 views17 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

спойлееррр лады покажу обладателя этой ass🌟 ето типа тренд крутецкий создаю персонажа по пинтересту вот мне лень оформлять красиво читайте так к слову - тут собрались все ненавистные мне вещи в рисовании

custom 523794753929822086010🍓4custom 53258851220780743553

3 Aug 2026, 17:39 UTC99 views15 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🌟 фак,гайсы, у меня новый гпф ВЫ ПРОСТА ГЛЯНЬТЕ НА НЕВО⭐⭐ 🌟🌟 🤍. @amnezaaa Я НЕ МОГУ ОН ТАКОЙ КОТЕНОК (я бы и минуты рядом с ним не продержалась из за вони❤️)

custom 54428716989845625495custom 54428266619574976944custom 523794753929822086032custom 53258851220780743551

3 Aug 2026, 11:28 UTC107 views9 reactionsread 6 August 2026

кароче у меня огромные планы⭐⭐ : 1.пост кмм 2.переоформить инфо пост. 3.отрисовать нового перса(бля надеюсь реализация моей задумки не провалится) 4.не заработать артблок и выгорание 🌟🌟 мне пезда 🌟🌟 🤍 🤍

custom 53258851220780743559

2 Aug 2026, 21:07 UTC114 views6 reactionsread 6 August 2026

тапайте реактов за мою больную спину и испорченную осанку пжж⭐⭐

custom 53258851220780743555custom 52379475392982208601

Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @amnezaaa. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 764,423 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“[РЕСТ] amneza[16+]” (@amnezaaa), 293 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/amnezaaa.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.