Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

أمل دنقل

@amldngl

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

2,902subscribers

-5 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001359526044
TypeChannel
Username@amldngl
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/amldngl

Growth

2,9022,9082,9057 August 2026 — 2,907 subscribers7 August 2026 — 2,907 subscribers8 August 2026 — 2,905 subscribers11 August 2026 — 2,908 subscribers15 August 2026 — 2,902 subscribers7 August 202615 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 8 days, net -5. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,901–2,909 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 01:532,902-6
11 Aug 2026, 12:372,908+3
8 Aug 2026, 10:052,905-2
7 Aug 2026, 11:012,907no change
7 Aug 2026, 10:482,907first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 27 January 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
16.9%
avg views ÷ 2,902 subscribers
Avg views / post
491
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.78%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
4
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 August 2026
Posts held20 (27 January 20262 August 2026)
Views total1,963
Reactions total35
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 17:03 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

246 reactions across 19 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 84.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
20884.6%
😢249.76%
👍72.85%
👎41.63%
🥰20.813%
🔥10.407%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 246reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 27 January 2026 to 2 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

2 Aug 2026, 11:24 UTC251 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026

أذكريني فقد لوثتني العناوين في الصحف الخائنة ! لوثَتْني لأني منذ الهزيمة لا لون لي غير لون الضياع - أمل دنقل

9

Signed محمد

28 Jul 2026, 23:09 UTC437 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @sitamool1

يا قاتلي: إني صفحتُ عنك في اللحظة التي استرحت بعدها مني استرحتُ منك! لكني أوصيك إن تشأ شنق الجميع أن ترحمَ الشجر لا تقطع الجذوع كي تنصبها مشانقا لا تقطع الجذوع فربما يأتي الربيع ((والعام عام جوع)) فلن تشتم في الفروع نكهة الثمر! وربما يمرّ في بلادنا الصيف الخطر فتقطع الصحراء. باحثاً عن الظلال فلا ترى سوى الهجير والرمال.. والهجير والرمال والظمأ الناري في الضلوع! يا سيد الشواهد البيضاء في الدجى.. يا قيصر الصقيع! -أمل

12

Signed محمد

20 Jul 2026, 08:48 UTC660 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @betllh

‌‎"ويهزني صحوي فأفتقدك.. لكن بلا جدوى بلا جدوى". - أمل دنقل

6

Signed محمد

20 Jul 2026, 08:47 UTC615 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @irq0c

‏وريقةً، وريقة يسقط عمري من نتيجة الحائط. - أمل دنقل

😢53

Signed محمد

13 Jul 2026, 07:14 UTC852 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026

أكتُب ويدي على النافذة والدموع على وجنة السماء أكتب وقلبي في الحقيبة يصغي لصفير القطارات أكتُب وأصابعي مشتتة على مناضد المقاهي ورفوفِ المكتبات أكتب وعنقي مشدود منذ بدء التاريخ إلى حبل مشنقة أكتب وأنا أحمل ممحاتي دائما لأقلّ طرقةِ باب وأضحكُ على نفسي بمرارةٍ حين لا أجد أحدًا سوى الريح .. أمل دنقل

11

Signed محمد

12 Jul 2026, 15:32 UTC730 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026

تسدل الأستار في المسرح فلنضيء الأنوار إنّ الوقت حان أمن الحكمة أن نبقى ؟ سدة ! قد خسرنا فرسينا في الرهان ! مالنا شوط مع الأحلام ثان ! - أمل دنقل

😢62👍1

Signed محمد

31 May 2026, 21:22 UTC≈1,220 views17 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

من قال "لا" في وجه من قالوا "نعم" من علّم الإنسان تمزيق العدم من قال "لا" .. فلم يمت , وظلّ روحا أبديّة الألم ورأى الرب ذلك غير حسنْ يا اخوتي الذين يعبرون في الميدان فلترفعوا عيونكم إليّ لربّما .. إذا التقت عيونكم بالموت في عينيّ يبتسم الفناء داخلي لأنّكم رفعتم رأسكم .. مرّه فلترفعوا عيونكم للثائر المشنوق فسوف تنتهون مثله .. غدا فالانحناء مرّ .. والعنكبوت فوق أعناق الرجال ينسج الردى الله لم يغفر خطيئة الشيطان حين قا

13👎4

Signed محمد

24 May 2026, 20:50 UTC≈1,180 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @zuhaa_1984

عبلة الرويني عن أمل دنقل: الشِعْرُ في داخله كان يدفعهُ إلى تجاوز كلِّ يقينٍ مؤقت إلى عوالمَ جديدة، ولهذا وقفَ دائمًا مع «الحلم» ضد «الواقع»، ومع الآتي ضد «الحاضر»، مكوّنًا وحدهُ حزبًا شعريًّا على الآخرين أن يتبعوه ويسيروا وراءه.

7👍3

Signed محمد

23 May 2026, 16:11 UTC≈1,810 views16 reactionsread 7 August 2026

و هل تتساوى يدٌ سيفها كان لك بيد سيفها أثكلك ؟! -أمل دنقل

16

Signed محمد

13 May 2026, 12:14 UTC≈1,600 views15 reactionsread 7 August 2026

آه.. ما أقسى الجدار عندما ينهض في وجه الشروق ربما ننفق كل العمر.. كي ننقب ثغرة ليمر النور للأجيال .. مرة! … ربما لو لم يكن هذا الجدار ما عرفنا قيمة الضوء الطليق!!

15

Signed محمد

31 Mar 2026, 22:10 UTC≈1,950 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026

شاركنا اقتباسك المفضل ل أمل دُنقل

3

Signed محمد

13 Mar 2026, 20:33 UTC≈2,390 views20 reactionsread 7 August 2026

نحن لم نولد لنهز الدنيا لم نخلق لنخوض المعارك نحن ولدنا للإلهام.. للأحلام.. للصلوات. -أمل دنقل

18🥰2

Signed محمد

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @amldngl. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

27 Jan 2026, 12:43 UTCAnonymous Poll106 voters

نكمل في الصوتيات؟

  1. نعم66%
  2. لا34%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 27 January 2026 to 2 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“أمل دنقل” (@amldngl), 2,902 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/amldngl.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.