Channel
@amitaryavart
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
4,005subscribers
-9 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001157711356 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @amitaryavart |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/amitaryavart |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 20:07 | 4,005 | -3 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 02:52 | 4,008 | -6 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 09:01 | 4,014 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 08:59 | 4,014 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 12 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 4 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (12 July 2026 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 8,412 |
| Reactions total | 179 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 05:43 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
226 reactions across 17 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 54.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 124 | 54.9% | |
| 👍 | 60 | 26.5% | |
| 😁 | 18 | 7.96% | |
| 🔥 | 16 | 7.08% | |
| 👏 | 3 | 1.33% | |
| 😡 | 2 | 0.885% | |
| 😢 | 2 | 0.885% | |
| 🤔 | 1 | 0.442% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 226reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 12 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
क्या आप जानते हैं? 🤔 बाजार में मिलने वाले बहुत से हेयर ऑयल में जिस तरह के प्राकृतिक तेल और जड़ी-बूटियों की हम उम्मीद करते हैं, उनकी वास्तविक मात्रा और गुणवत्ता हमेशा वैसी नहीं होती जैसी हम सोचते हैं। कई उत्पादों में तिल, सरसों या नारियल जैसे पारंपरिक तेलों की जगह अलग-अलग प्रकार के वनस्पति तेल (Vegetable Oils) और अन्य कॉस्मेटिक सामग्री का उपयोग किया जाता है। वहीं दूसरी तरफ, असली जड़ी-बूटियों और प्राकृतिक तेलों से त…
👍9❤4
अंकित वाले इस पोस्टर को देखिए इसे स्पांसर किसने किया है मतलब इस फाइट पर पैसा किसका लगा है, बीच में 1 win लिखा हुआ है, (1win एक अंतरराष्ट्रीय ऑनलाइन सट्टेबाजी (sports betting) और ऑनलाइन कैसीनो (online casino) प्लेटफॉर्म है,) अंकित को मै समझदार समझता था किंतु इसने मूर्खता दिखाई ये कार्य करके, आगे तो मैं क्या कहूँ आप लोग खुद इससे सवाल करो , ऐसा नहीं है कि ये भाई कोई बुरा इंसान है, किंतु सोच समझ कर काम करना चाहिए
👍14🤔1😡1
..हाँ.. हम भी देखेंगे, लाज़िम है कि हम भी देखेंगे। जब नाम रहेगा केवल ओम् का, जो व्यापक है, अविनाशी है, जब सनातन विरोधी सारे मत भारत से, रुई की तरह उड़ जाएँगे, जब मानवता के पावन पथ से, सब रोड़े हट जाएँगे। जब इस पावन भारत-भू पर, अज्ञान-अंधेरा हारेगा, जब सत्य-धर्म का ओजस्वी सूरज, फिर नया सवेरा लाएगा। हाँ.. हम भी देखेंगे, लाज़िम है कि हम भी देखेंगे। नाम रहेगा केवल ओम् का, बाकी सब मिट जाएंगे। हाँ हम भी देखेंगे। एक हाथ म…
👍13❤10🔥5
इसमें सब है, इतिहास, वीर रस गीत, व्यायाम, भोजन , योग, आसन , ध्यान, एक महायोद्धा की दिनचर्या https://youtu.be/MdAXoqo1ibI
❤9
ये थे महामानव जिन्होंने देश धर्म की रक्षा की थी , बूढ़े होकर मत मरना, वर्तमान देश में अनेकों देश द्रोही है,
❤19
नमस्ते जी 🙏, जिन भाइयों के ऑर्डर आए थे आज उनके लिए तेल तैयार कर रहा हूं, शायद कल शाम तक, या परसो सुबह कोरियर से भेज दूंगा, दूरी के अनुसार 3 या 4 दिन में आपको मिल जाएगा, ओर वीडियो भी यूट्यूब पर डालूंगा इसकी छोटी विधि बनाकर , जो खुद बनाना चाहे खुद बना लेना, मैं कोई यहां बड़ा व्यापार करने नहीं आया, बस कुछ साल बिताने हैं ओर इस समाज में बस, ओर pdf भी आपको भेज दूंगा आज या फिर कल तक, जिसमें एक्यूप्रेशर के विशेष बिंदु होंगे…
👍8👏1
इस रविवार छत्रपति शिवाजी महाराज का व्यायाम ओर भोजन जानेंगे बल्कि इतिहास में जाकर देख कर आएंगे, इस रविवार भारत योगी यूट्यूब पर जरूर आएं दोहर 2.30 बजे अभी ये छोटी वीडियो देखें और इंस्टाग्राम पर भी जुड़े https://www.instagram.com/reel/DbI7I_mpPWd/?igsh=OTYyM2RsenJrM3I3
❤5
अमित आर्यावर्त (भारत योगी) pinned «🌿 भारत योगी सिद्ध केश तैल, कृपया अपना ऑर्डर बुक करें🌿 ध्यान दे - अभी मैं पहले बैच में केवल 100 बोतलें ही बना रहा हूँ। सबसे पहले मैं यह जानकारी टेलीग्राम और व्हाट्सएप के साथियों के साथ साझा कर रहा हूँ, क्योंकि यूट्यूब पर हजारों की संख्या में साथी सक्रिय रहते…»
🌿 भारत योगी सिद्ध केश तैल, कृपया अपना ऑर्डर बुक करें🌿 ध्यान दे - अभी मैं पहले बैच में केवल 100 बोतलें ही बना रहा हूँ। सबसे पहले मैं यह जानकारी टेलीग्राम और व्हाट्सएप के साथियों के साथ साझा कर रहा हूँ, क्योंकि यूट्यूब पर हजारों की संख्या में साथी सक्रिय रहते हैं और मैं अभी इतना ज्यादा तेल बना नहीं रहा हूँ। इसमें गुणवत्ता का बहुत ध्यान रखना पड़ता है। मैं किसी प्रकार की मशीनों का प्रयोग नहीं करता, सब जड़ी-बूटियाँ हाथों …
👍9❤5
इतिहास बार-बार खुद को उसी रूप में दोहरा रहा है किस ओर संकेत है यह? भगत सिंह को भी न्याय के नाम पर अंग्रेजी कचहरी में न्याय का ढोंग किया गया जबकि भगत सिंह ने ऐसा कोई कार्य नहीं किया था कि उन्हें फांसी की ही सजा हो दूसरी सजा अंग्रेज दे सकते थे किंतु नहीं क्योंकि एक सच्चा राष्ट्रभक्त तानाशाहों की आंखों में चुभता है। भरत तिवारी जैसे वीर पुरुष के साथ भी यही हुआ, पहले इनकी हत्या की खाकी ने और अब न्याय के नाम पर बस टालम…
❤12👍3
बप्पा रावल का ईरान तक साम्राज्य था https://youtube.com/shorts/2mlCBGWtBMA?si=3ihZaRO7c-zxpXwm
❤4
ये बीमार नस्ल हटाएगी मोदी को 😄😂
😁18👏2😢2❤1😡1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @amitaryavart. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,433,315 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“अमित आर्यावर्त (भारत योगी)” (@amitaryavart), 4,005 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/amitaryavart.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.