Channel
@amirfakhar
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
4,594subscribers
-42 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001112931915 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @amirfakhar |
| Created | Between 1 February 2017 and 31 March 2019— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 21 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 21 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/amirfakhar |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 21 Aug 2026, 15:15 | 4,594 | -13 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 19:35 | 4,607 | -12 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 20:38 | 4,619 | -16 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 20:26 | 4,635 | -1 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 16:45 | 4,636 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 8 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 18 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
306 reactions across 18 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 103 | 33.7% | |
| 👍 | 74 | 24.2% | |
| ❤🔥 | 54 | 17.6% | |
| 🤩 | 24 | 7.84% | |
| 🤬 | 19 | 6.21% | |
| 😍 | 15 | 4.90% | |
| 👌 | 11 | 3.59% | |
| 💔 | 3 | 0.98% | |
| 🌚 | 1 | 0.327% | |
| 👾 | 1 | 0.327% | |
| 💊 | 1 | 0.327% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 306reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 8 February 2026 to 18 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
پایه اید ؟
The shares total 104%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
👌5
احتمالن دوباره یوتیوب هم شروع کنیم و هر قسمت جدیدی ک میاد رو باهم ری اکشن بریم و تحلیل کنیم و با بچه های عشق ابدی و مارشو هم مصاحبه بگیریم اگ پایه اید ی نظر سنجی میزارم پایین بترکونید ببینم چی ب چیه
🔥6👍2😍1
من با چندتا از بچه های عشق ابدی و مارشو رفیقم قراره ی سری کارا کنیم ک حسابی بترکونه
🔥3😍3
میخام ی کانال تلگرام دگ بزنم ک توش برنامههای عشق ابدی و مارشو رو تحلیل کنیم و کمی ام افشاگری کنیم
😍4🔥1
میخام ی حرکت خیلی خفن بزنم
عشقای من
😍5
کانال مغازمو داشته باشید @cactusgallery75
:)
❤🔥16👍2💊1
به زودی منتظر کلی اتفاق خفن باشید ٫ کلی موزیکای خفن 🌶️😍
🤩24🌚1💔1🔥1😍1
بلاخره اینترنت ها وصل شد😍
👍25👌1
سلام به همه قشنگای من 🫂
👍6❤🔥3
سلام خوشگلای من😍 ب زوررررررررر تونسم وصل شمممممم
🔥8
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @amirfakhar. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
پایه اید ؟
The shares total 104%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 8 February 2026 to 18 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 21 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Amir Fakhar” (@amirfakhar), 4,594 subscribers as measured 21 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/amirfakhar.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.