🗂کارگاه مهارت افزایی اتاق درمان 🧠 مهارتهای اتاق درمان؛ جایی که دانش نظری به توانمندی بالینی تبدیل میشود. 🔹 ۵ مفهوم کلیدی در اتاق درمان با تدریس دکتر حامد نقاشیان 1. سازمان شخصیت از منظر روانکاوی 2. کارکردهای ایگو و سطوح سوپرایگو 3. دفاع های روانی در اطاق درمان 4. تحریف های شناختی متداول 5. بررسی ۵ روانسنجی پرکاربرد 🔹 استاد صادق زمانی دستگردی: تمرکز بر مهارت «سکوت کردن در اتاق درمان» 📅 28 و 29 مرداد ⏰ ساعت ۱…

Channel
آقای زمانی ۱۸/۱۹
@amiralizamani98
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
3,437subscribers
-84 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001378772164 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @amiralizamani98 |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 15 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/amiralizamani98 |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 14 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 56% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Sept 2026, 15:18 | 3,437 | -12 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 04:59 | 3,449 | -3 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 21:00 | 3,452 | -7 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 12:40 | 3,459 | +2 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 08:33 | 3,457 | -12 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 01:39 | 3,469 | -4 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 23:35 | 3,473 | -10 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 05:35 | 3,483 | -11 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 10:25 | 3,494 | -5 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 17:35 | 3,499 | -1 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 05:28 | 3,500 | -10 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 18:23 | 3,510 | -7 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 00:12 | 3,517 | -4 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 08:31 | 3,521 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 08:27 | 3,521 | first reading |
Engagement
22 posts held, back to 25 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 4 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 22 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
752 reactions across 21 posts, in 25 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 208 | 27.7% | |
| 👎 | 133 | 17.7% | |
| ❤ | 110 | 14.6% | |
| 🤔 | 59 | 7.85% | |
| 😍 | 58 | 7.71% | |
| 🤣 | 36 | 4.79% | |
| 👌 | 34 | 4.52% | |
| 💔 | 22 | 2.93% | |
| 👏 | 20 | 2.66% | |
| 🤷♀ | 15 | 1.99% | |
| 😈 | 9 | 1.20% | |
| 🤮 | 9 | 1.20% | |
| 🎉 | 8 | 1.06% | |
| 😢 | 6 | 0.798% | |
| 🙏 | 6 | 0.798% | |
| 🤷♂ | 4 | 0.532% | |
| 🍌 | 3 | 0.399% | |
| 🌚 | 2 | 0.266% | |
| 🔥 | 2 | 0.266% | |
| 😭 | 2 | 0.266% | |
| 5 further kinds | 6 | 0.798% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 21 of the 22 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 752 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 25 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
متاسفانه یه خبر خیلی خیلی بد دارم که میگه حال اقا مجتبی خامنهای بسیار وخیمه و هرلحظه امکان مردنش هس😭😶🌫️
🤣19👎11😍5🎉3😭2🍾1🎃1
دخترم 20 سالمه راستش من دیگه از دست مادرم خسته شدم. احساس میکنم هر کاری میکنم یه ایرادی ازم میگیره. حتی وقتی میخوام یه خبر خوب بهش بدم، آخرش یه جوری حرف میزنه که حس میکنم کافی نیستم. بعد از هر بار صحبت باهاش چند ساعت حالم بده. از یه طرف هم نمیتونم ازش فاصله بگیرم ولی هر بار که باهاش حرف میزنم دوباره عصبی و ناراحت میشم. خواهرم میگه بیخیالش شو، ولی من نمیتونم. انگار هنوز منتظرم یه روزی مادرم منو همونجوری ک…
💔22❤13😢4👍2⚡1👎1
اگر AI بتواند بخش بزرگی از کارهایی را که امروز انجام میدهیم انجام دهد، چه چیزی در یک درمانگر باقی میماند که واقعاً ارزشمند است؟ توانایی تحمل سکوت؟ ماندن با ابهام؟ فهم انتقال و انتقال متقابل؟ شناختن خود در رابطه با مراجع؟ یا توانایی تشخیص لحظهای که بهترین مداخله، هیچ مداخلهای نیست؟ شاید آینده متعلق به درمانگری نباشد که بیشتر از AI میداند؛ بلکه متعلق به درمانگری باشد که چیزهایی را میفهمد که به این سادگی قابل جایگ…
👏18❤15👍12🙏3🤩2
وقتی میگن تو که روانشناسی از تو بعیده عصبی بشی مثل اینه ک بگی تو که مربی بدنسازی از تو بعیده پیر بشی
👌33👍6🤣5❤3
اگر AI آنقدر خوب شود که دیگر نفهمیم چه چیزی در یک رواندرمانگر انسانی وجود دارد که ارزش پرداختن برایش را داشته باشد. به نظر شما آن «چیز» چیست که همچنان متفاوت ترین است؟ 😍 رابطه با یک انسان ❤️ تجربه زیسته 👍 حس واقعی بودن 🎉 هیچچیز؛ اگر AI بهتر باشد، انسان ضرورتی ندارد
👍24😍15❤7🎉5👀1
در اتاق درمان اگر یک AI هیچوقت شما را ترک نکند، چون اساساً «توانایی ترک کردن» ندارد... آیا ماندن او هنوز همان معنایی را دارد که ماندنِ انسانی دارد که میتوانست برود، اما انتخاب کرد بماند؟ 👍 بله 👎 نه 🤔 شاید 🤷♂️🤷🏻♀️نمیدانم
👎44🤔4🤷♀3👍2🤷♂2🍌1
فرض کنید ثابت شود درمان با AI، بهطور متوسط، از درمان با انسان مؤثرتر است. آن روز، بزرگترین مانع شما برای انتخاب AI چیست؟ 👍 هیچ مانعی ندارم. 🌚 اعتماد نمیکنم. 😍 رابطه انسانی را نمیتوان حذف کرد. 😈 حریم خصوصی.
😍38👍10😈9🌚2
اگر هوش مصنوعی بتواند دقیقاً بفهمد چرا عاشق میشوید، چرا فرار میکنید، چرا خشمگین میشوید و چرا خودتان را تخریب میکنید... اما خودش هرگز عاشق نشده باشد، هرگز طرد نشده باشد و هرگز رنج نکشیده باشد... آیا میتواند واقعاً شما را بفهمد؟ 👍 بله؛ فهمیدن به تجربه شخصی نیاز ندارد 👎 نه؛ بدون تجربه زیسته، فهم ناقص است 🤔 شاید 🤷♂️🤷🏻♀️ نمیدانم؛ اما سؤال سختی است
👎31👍20🤔12🤷♀12🤷♂2🍌1
اگر نرخ موفقیت AI از رواندرمانگرها بیشتر شود، آیا از AI درمان میگیرید؟ 👍 بدون تردید 🤔 شاید، اگر شواهد علمی قوی باشد. 👎 نه، حتی اگر موفقتر باشد.
🤔43👍27👎18
اگر AI بتواند شما را بهتر از درمانگرتان بفهمد، هنوز ترجیح میدهید به اتاق درمان بروید؟ 👍 بله 👎 نه ❤️ نمیدانم؛ شاید خودِ رابطه بخشی از درمان باشد 🤣 من فقط میخواهم یکی بالاخره من را بفهمد!
👍42❤26👎26🤣12
در نهایت من نمیتوانم بگویم دوپاره سازی کنید یا نه ؛ نمیتوانم بگویم ظرفیت دوسوگرایی را افزایش دهید یا ندهید. وظیفه ای من این نیست که بگویم این روش مدیریت اضطراب اخلاقی است یا نه اما میشود دید ذهن چه میکند و آیا این کارکرد مفید می افتد یا نه ؟باید دید این دفاع چه هزینهای دارد، چه چیزی را ممکن میکند و چه چیزی را از ما میگیرد. خوانش روانکاوانه ی "حکومتی ها "
❤17👍3🙏2🍌1🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @amiralizamani98. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
به عنوان یک پادشاهی خواه یا به عنوان فردی که شاهزاده رضا پهلوی را برای رهبری دوران گذار مناسب میدانید؛ به نظر شما نظر شاهزاده رضا پهلوی چیست؟
- ما نیازمند جامعه ی دوپاره هستیم8%
- ما نیاز به ظرفیت تحمل دوسوگرایی داریم37%
- نمیدانم21%
- من مخالف رضا پهلوی هستم33%
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 25 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@ravantahlilgar · 27,105
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 11 September 2026
@Hrman11 · 23,378
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 18 September 2026
@artafitness · 54,613
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 23 August 2026
@Psychological_Tools · 44,885
Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 28 August 2026
@insightAcademia · 55,461
Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 24 August 2026
@anbar100 · 28,665
Telegram ranks this channel #76 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 9 September 2026
@Closeup_psychology · 69,868
Telegram ranks this channel #95 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 20 August 2026
This channel appears in 7 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“آقای زمانی ۱۸/۱۹” (@amiralizamani98), 3,437 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/amiralizamani98.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.