Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for آقای زمانی ۱۸/۱۹

Channel

آقای زمانی ۱۸/۱۹

@amiralizamani98

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

3,437subscribers

-84 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001378772164
TypeChannel
Username@amiralizamani98
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held15
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/amiralizamani98

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 14 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 56% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

3,4373,5213,4797 August 2026 — 3,521 subscribers7 August 2026 — 3,521 subscribers8 August 2026 — 3,517 subscribers10 August 2026 — 3,510 subscribers14 August 2026 — 3,500 subscribers17 August 2026 — 3,499 subscribers20 August 2026 — 3,494 subscribers24 August 2026 — 3,483 subscribers26 August 2026 — 3,473 subscribers30 August 2026 — 3,469 subscribers2 September 2026 — 3,457 subscribers7 September 2026 — 3,459 subscribers11 September 2026 — 3,452 subscribers15 September 2026 — 3,449 subscribers19 September 2026 — 3,437 subscribers7 August 202619 September 2026
15 measurements spanning 43 days, net -84. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,424–3,534 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 15:183,437-12
15 Sept 2026, 04:593,449-3
11 Sept 2026, 21:003,452-7
7 Sept 2026, 12:403,459+2
2 Sept 2026, 08:333,457-12
30 Aug 2026, 01:393,469-4
26 Aug 2026, 23:353,473-10
24 Aug 2026, 05:353,483-11
20 Aug 2026, 10:253,494-5
17 Aug 2026, 17:353,499-1
14 Aug 2026, 05:283,500-10
10 Aug 2026, 18:233,510-7
8 Aug 2026, 00:123,517-4
7 Aug 2026, 08:313,521no change
7 Aug 2026, 08:273,521first reading

Engagement

22 posts held, back to 25 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 4 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 22 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

752 reactions across 21 posts, in 25 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍20827.7%
👎13317.7%
11014.6%
🤔597.85%
😍587.71%
🤣364.79%
👌344.52%
💔222.93%
👏202.66%
🤷‍♀151.99%
😈91.20%
🤮91.20%
🎉81.06%
😢60.798%
🙏60.798%
🤷‍♂40.532%
🍌30.399%
🌚20.266%
🔥20.266%
😭20.266%
5 further kinds60.798%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 21 of the 22 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 752 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 25 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 18:20 UTC62 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @PSYTALENTIRPhoto

🗂کارگاه مهارت افزایی اتاق درمان 🧠 مهارت‌های اتاق درمان؛ جایی که دانش نظری به توانمندی بالینی تبدیل می‌شود. 🔹 ۵ مفهوم کلیدی در اتاق درمان با تدریس دکتر حامد نقاشیان 1. سازمان شخصیت از منظر روانکاوی 2. کارکردهای ایگو و سطوح سوپرایگو 3. دفاع های روانی در اطاق درمان 4. تحریف های شناختی متداول 5. بررسی ۵ روانسنجی پرکاربرد 🔹 استاد صادق زمانی دستگردی: تمرکز بر مهارت «سکوت کردن در اتاق درمان» 📅 28 و 29 مرداد ⏰ ساعت ۱

7 Aug 2026, 12:11 UTC183 views42 reactionsread 7 August 2026

متاسفانه یه خبر خیلی خیلی بد دارم که میگه حال اقا مجتبی خامنه‌ای بسیار وخیمه و هرلحظه امکان مردنش هس😭😶‍🌫️

🤣19👎11😍5🎉3😭2🍾1🎃1

6 Aug 2026, 12:23 UTC276 views43 reactionsread 7 August 2026

دخترم 20 سالمه راستش من دیگه از دست مادرم خسته شدم. احساس می‌کنم هر کاری می‌کنم یه ایرادی ازم می‌گیره. حتی وقتی می‌خوام یه خبر خوب بهش بدم، آخرش یه جوری حرف می‌زنه که حس می‌کنم کافی نیستم. بعد از هر بار صحبت باهاش چند ساعت حالم بده. از یه طرف هم نمی‌تونم ازش فاصله بگیرم ولی هر بار که باهاش حرف می‌زنم دوباره عصبی و ناراحت می‌شم. خواهرم می‌گه بی‌خیالش شو، ولی من نمی‌تونم. انگار هنوز منتظرم یه روزی مادرم منو همون‌جوری ک

💔2213😢4👍21👎1

4 Aug 2026, 16:26 UTC557 views50 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Voice message

اگر AI بتواند بخش بزرگی از کارهایی را که امروز انجام می‌دهیم انجام دهد، چه چیزی در یک درمانگر باقی می‌ماند که واقعاً ارزشمند است؟ توانایی تحمل سکوت؟ ماندن با ابهام؟ فهم انتقال و انتقال متقابل؟ شناختن خود در رابطه با مراجع؟ یا توانایی تشخیص لحظه‌ای که بهترین مداخله، هیچ مداخله‌ای نیست؟ شاید آینده متعلق به درمانگری نباشد که بیشتر از AI می‌داند؛ بلکه متعلق به درمانگری باشد که چیزهایی را می‌فهمد که به این سادگی قابل جایگ

👏1815👍12🙏3🤩2

4 Aug 2026, 09:19 UTC473 views47 reactionsread 7 August 2026

وقتی میگن تو که روانشناسی از تو‌ بعیده عصبی بشی مثل اینه ک بگی تو که مربی بدنسازی از تو بعیده پیر بشی

👌33👍6🤣53

2 Aug 2026, 19:03 UTC603 views52 reactionsread 7 August 2026

اگر AI آن‌قدر خوب شود که دیگر نفهمیم چه چیزی در یک روان‌درمانگر انسانی وجود دارد که ارزش پرداختن برایش را داشته باشد. به نظر شما آن «چیز» چیست که همچنان متفاوت ترین است؟ 😍 رابطه با یک انسان ❤️ تجربه زیسته 👍 حس واقعی بودن 🎉 هیچ‌چیز؛ اگر AI بهتر باشد، انسان ضرورتی ندارد

👍24😍157🎉5👀1

31 Jul 2026, 20:44 UTC765 views56 reactionsread 7 August 2026

در اتاق درمان اگر یک AI هیچ‌وقت شما را ترک نکند، چون اساساً «توانایی ترک کردن» ندارد... آیا ماندن او هنوز همان معنایی را دارد که ماندنِ انسانی دارد که می‌توانست برود، اما انتخاب کرد بماند؟ 👍 بله 👎 نه 🤔 شاید 🤷‍♂️🤷🏻‍♀️نمیدانم

👎44🤔4🤷‍♀3👍2🤷‍♂2🍌1

31 Jul 2026, 20:15 UTC660 views59 reactionsread 7 August 2026

فرض کنید ثابت شود درمان با AI، به‌طور متوسط، از درمان با انسان مؤثرتر است. آن روز، بزرگ‌ترین مانع شما برای انتخاب AI چیست؟ 👍 هیچ مانعی ندارم. 🌚 اعتماد نمی‌کنم. 😍 رابطه انسانی را نمی‌توان حذف کرد. 😈 حریم خصوصی.

😍38👍10😈9🌚2

27 Jul 2026, 19:31 UTC≈1,090 views78 reactionsread 7 August 2026

اگر هوش مصنوعی بتواند دقیقاً بفهمد چرا عاشق می‌شوید، چرا فرار می‌کنید، چرا خشمگین می‌شوید و چرا خودتان را تخریب می‌کنید... اما خودش هرگز عاشق نشده باشد، هرگز طرد نشده باشد و هرگز رنج نکشیده باشد... آیا می‌تواند واقعاً شما را بفهمد؟ 👍 بله؛ فهمیدن به تجربه شخصی نیاز ندارد 👎 نه؛ بدون تجربه زیسته، فهم ناقص است 🤔 شاید 🤷‍♂️🤷🏻‍♀️ نمی‌دانم؛ اما سؤال سختی است

👎31👍20🤔12🤷‍♀12🤷‍♂2🍌1

27 Jul 2026, 07:00 UTC970 views88 reactionsread 7 August 2026

اگر نرخ موفقیت AI از روان‌درمانگرها بیشتر شود، آیا از AI درمان می‌گیرید؟ 👍 بدون تردید 🤔 شاید، اگر شواهد علمی قوی باشد. 👎 نه، حتی اگر موفق‌تر باشد.

🤔43👍27👎18

26 Jul 2026, 20:39 UTC925 views106 reactionsread 7 August 2026

اگر AI بتواند شما را بهتر از درمانگرتان بفهمد، هنوز ترجیح می‌دهید به اتاق درمان بروید؟ 👍 بله 👎 نه ❤️ نمی‌دانم؛ شاید خودِ رابطه بخشی از درمان باشد 🤣 من فقط می‌خواهم یکی بالاخره من را بفهمد!

👍4226👎26🤣12

25 Jul 2026, 19:24 UTC733 views24 reactionsread 7 August 2026

در نهایت من نمیتوانم بگویم دوپاره سازی کنید یا نه ؛ نمیتوانم بگویم ظرفیت دوسوگرایی را افزایش دهید یا ندهید. وظیفه ای من این نیست که بگویم این روش مدیریت اضطراب اخلاقی است یا نه اما میشود دید ذهن چه میکند و آیا این کارکرد مفید می افتد یا نه ؟باید دید این دفاع چه هزینه‌ای دارد، چه چیزی را ممکن می‌کند و چه چیزی را از ما می‌گیرد. خوانش روانکاوانه ی "حکومتی ها "

17👍3🙏2🍌1🔥1

Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @amiralizamani98. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

25 Jul 2026, 18:31 UTCAnonymous Poll75 voters

به عنوان یک پادشاهی خواه یا به عنوان فردی که شاهزاده رضا پهلوی را برای رهبری دوران گذار مناسب میدانید؛ به نظر شما نظر شاهزاده رضا پهلوی چیست؟

  1. ما نیازمند جامعه ی دوپاره هستیم8%
  2. ما نیاز به ظرفیت تحمل دوسوگرایی داریم37%
  3. نمیدانم21%
  4. من مخالف رضا پهلوی هستم33%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 25 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

روانشناسی با طعم هیجان
@ravantahlilgar · 27,105
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 11 September 2026
یافته‌های نوین روانشناختی
@Hrman11 · 23,378
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 18 September 2026
arta fitness
@artafitness · 54,613
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 23 August 2026
کتابخانه روانشناسی تخصصی
@Psychological_Tools · 44,885
Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 28 August 2026
insight(کنکور ارشد روانشناسی)
@insightAcademia · 55,461
Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 24 August 2026
انبارستان🎧
@anbar100 · 28,665
Telegram ranks this channel #76 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 9 September 2026
کلوزآپ روانشناسی
@Closeup_psychology · 69,868
Telegram ranks this channel #95 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 20 August 2026

This channel appears in 7 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“آقای زمانی ۱۸/۱۹” (@amiralizamani98), 3,437 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/amiralizamani98.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.