я пишу спустя столько времени,но а друг кто-то смотрит

Channel
ПЕРЕЕЗД 悲しみ. . minili . .
@amir_nin3
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
76subscribers
-5 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002485544183 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @amir_nin3 |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 28 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 28 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/amir_nin3 |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 28 Aug 2026, 10:18 | 76 | -4 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 23:53 | 80 | -1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 18:31 | 81 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:25 | 81 | first reading |
Engagement
17 posts held, back to 4 June 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 19 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 36s
- Average length
- 12s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
279 reactions across 11 posts, in 20 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 9.68% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5352768065413070367 | 27 | 9.68% | |
| custom 5352771793444683412 | 27 | 9.68% | |
| custom 5348402196796960157 | 20 | 7.17% | |
| custom 5352884025235097628 | 19 | 6.81% | |
| custom 5368585175833803258 | 19 | 6.81% | |
| custom 5350537834925145868 | 18 | 6.45% | |
| custom 5352768572219211522 | 18 | 6.45% | |
| custom 5377688401967336790 | 17 | 6.09% | |
| custom 5197429921634346862 | 16 | 5.73% | |
| custom 5348195179373296108 | 16 | 5.73% | |
| custom 5370790130439187987 | 16 | 5.73% | |
| custom 5352721731305879044 | 15 | 5.38% | |
| custom 5348312960261450822 | 14 | 5.02% | |
| custom 5348459719293954811 | 10 | 3.58% | |
| custom 5352923448739904134 | 10 | 3.58% | |
| custom 5197198714954854207 | 5 | 1.79% | |
| custom 5190789872129962198 | 4 | 1.43% | |
| custom 5199607246715104376 | 4 | 1.43% | |
| custom 5199967624536011324 | 2 | 0.717% | |
| custom 5273801333579724993 | 2 | 0.717% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 279reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 4 June 2025 to 19 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 5
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 4
- of 17 we hold a reading for · 24%
- Most on one post
- 2
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @amir_nin3. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 17 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 June 2025 to 19 May 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
я нашла эту имбуличку,как на счёт возобновить всё?
I LOVE you so, i could never LET YOU GO
custom 51971987149548542075custom 51996072467151043764custom 51999676245360113242custom 52738013335797249932
Photo, posted without a caption
custom 53483129602614508225custom 53484021967969601575custom 53484597192939548114custom 53481951793732961083custom 53685851758338032583custom 53707901304391879873custom 51974299216343468622
Sticker, posted without a caption
custom 53483129602614508221
Video message, posted without a caption
custom 53481951793732961083custom 51974299216343468622custom 53707901304391879871
парочку ✨✨✨✨✨✨✨ это лишь ((🔞) для 🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠 пару ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ чтоб от счастья "🤍" пело больше 🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂 от 🔡🔡🔡🔡🔡🔡 до 🔡🔡🔡🔡🔡🔡🔡🔡
custom 53685851758338032587custom 53484021967969601575custom 53484597192939548114custom 51974299216343468623custom 53481951793732961083custom 53483129602614508222custom 53707901304391879872
⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
custom 53685851758338032585custom 53481951793732961084custom 53707901304391879874custom 51974299216343468623custom 53484021967969601573custom 53484597192939548112
Sticker, posted without a caption
Photo, posted without a caption
custom 53484021967969601577custom 53483129602614508226custom 53707901304391879876custom 51974299216343468625custom 51907898721299621984custom 53685851758338032584custom 53481951793732961083
⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ и я снова пересматриваю твои фото, ведь ты у меня так красив🌟
custom 53505378349251458688custom 53528840252350976288custom 53527217313058790447custom 53527717934446834126custom 53527680654130703673custom 53529234487399041343custom 51974299216343468621
Sticker, posted without a caption
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @amir_nin3. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 777,789 of 1,626,935entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ПЕРЕЕЗД 悲しみ. . minili . .” (@amir_nin3), 76 subscribers as measured 28 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/amir_nin3.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.