Channel
@amcamps
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
16subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 15 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002075595735 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @amcamps |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 20 March 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 15 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 22 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 22 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/amcamps |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Aug 2026, 07:58 | 16 | no change |
| 15 Aug 2026, 04:02 | 16 | first reading |
10 posts held, back to 20 March 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 10 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Celebrity Giveaway Growth Campaign results from @Floydmayweather (23.9M). Screenshots were taken one day prior to end of campaign, avg growth ranged 20-30K. DM me @mediaslurp for details of all upcoming growth campaigns 🔥🤝
Celeb Campaign Growth Result for Client with @Olgagrigoryanstyle (7M), @mariamgrigoryanofficial (15M) Growth Campaign! DM me @mediaslurp for details of all upcoming growth campaigns 🔥
ADIRMEDIA CELEB CAMPAIGNS pinned «Here’s how an Instagram Celebrity Giveaway Growth Campaign works: • All clients are followed by a host page. • The celebrity involved in the campaign, will the do a post promoting a giveaway and redirecting their followers to follow the host page and follow…»
Here’s how an Instagram Celebrity Giveaway Growth Campaign works: • All clients are followed by a host page. • The celebrity involved in the campaign, will the do a post promoting a giveaway and redirecting their followers to follow the host page and follow everyone the host page is following (you - as our client). • So you’re indirectly gaining the followers of the celeb involved.
@JordynJones camp gained 17K+ to a client starting from 0. Advertised growth was 10-15K , happily over performed :) Dm @mediaslurp for more campaigns
Camp with @Jordynjones went live. Advertised was 10-15K growth in 4-5 days. And we already at 14K+ growth in less than 12h. Don’t sleep on the camps I provide 🤝
Clients Gaining an Average of 40K+ Followers from an advertised estimate of 25-35K Followers from the @floydmayweather campaign. DM me @mediaslurp for upcoming giveaway campaigns 🤝
Photo, posted without a caption
Client Gaining 58K Growth from an estimate of 60K-80K range from the @imcardib (Cardi B) campaign. Massive push due to Super Bowl and Music Release prior to giveaway campaign going live. DM me @mediaslurp for upcoming giveaway campaigns 🤝
Photo, posted without a caption
Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @amcamps. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,443,000 of 1,622,129entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@amcamps named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ADIRMEDIA CELEB CAMPAIGNS” (@amcamps), 16 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/amcamps.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.