Channel
@amc_moscow
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
4,080subscribers
+98 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001527872851 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @amc_moscow |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/amc_moscow |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Aug 2026, 20:27 | 4,080 | +37 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 07:34 | 4,043 | +9 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 01:27 | 4,034 | +55 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 16:01 | 3,979 | -3 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 06:06 | 3,982 | first reading |
28 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 4 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 28 (2 August 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 11,425 |
| Reactions total | 207 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 05:45 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
134 reactions across 20 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 69.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 93 | 69.4% | |
| 👍 | 32 | 23.9% | |
| 🔥 | 5 | 3.73% | |
| 🥰 | 4 | 2.99% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 28 of the 28 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 207reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 28 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Вы читали роман «Великий Гэтсби»?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
❤4
«Так мы и плывем вперед, борясь с течением…» Вы читали роман «Великий Гэтсби»? • Да • Нет, но хотел(а) бы прочитать • Я только смотрел(а) фильм Присоединяйтесь сегодня к встрече «Original Cut» и обсудите, что лучше — книга или ее экранизация! Начало в 19:00 по московскому времени: https://amc.timepad.ru/event/3991594/
🔥5❤1
Присоединяйтесь сегодня в 19:00 МСК к встрече программы «Original Cut», где мы обсудим роман «Великий Гэтсби» и его экранизацию режиссера База Лурмана. https://amc.timepad.ru/event/3991594/
👍7❤1
Присоединяйтесь сегодня в 18:00 МСК к повтору интервью с доктором Райаном Монтойей, который расскажет об истории комиксов, своей работе врача и художника, а также о развивающемся направлении Graphic Medicine. YouTube: https://youtube.com/live/MopvC6Nqnms?feature=share VK: https://vkvideo.ru/live-48722056_456240652
👍9
Что вы выбрали бы: Собаку, которая только понимает все, что вы говорите, ИЛИ Кошку, которая только умеет говорить сама? Что бы выбрали вы? Хотите обсудить это и другие интересные темы? Присоединяйтесь сегодня к Conversation Club в 20:00 по московскому времени: https://amc.timepad.ru/event/2519566/
❤8
Чему комиксы могут научить нас об истории, культуре и даже медицине? Присоединяйтесь 7 августа в 18:00 МСК к повтору беседы с доктором Райаном Монтойей, американским врачом и профессиональным художником комиксов. Доктор Монтойя расскажет о своем необычном профессиональном пути, познакомит с историей комиксов и представит направление Graphic Medicine, в котором комиксы используются для передачи опыта пациентов, меди…
❤6
Может ли фильм передать мощь классического романа? Присоединяйтесь 7 августа в 19:00 по московскому времени к встрече «Original Cut», где мы сравним роман Ф. Скотта Фицджеральда «Великий Гэтсби» с его знаменитой экранизацией режиссера База Лурмана. Обсудим сюжет, героев, основные темы произведения и творческие решения, благодаря которым эта классика американской литературы обрела новую жизнь на экране. https://amc…
👍12
Как осознанность помогает стать более эффективным лидером и частью команды? Узнайте сегодня в 18:00 по московскому времени — смотрите интервью с Лори Зукин, д-ром наук, генеральным директором и основателем Zukin Leadership. Поговорим о том, как эмоциональная осознанность, лидерские качества и внимание к психическому здоровью помогают создавать сильные команды и более успешную рабочую среду. YouTube: https://youtub…
❤8
Conversation Club встречается сегодня в 20:00 по московскому времени. Если вы хотите поговорить о своей любимой спортивной команде, домашних питомцах или животных, которые кажутся вам самыми интересными, присоединяйтесь к нашему вечеру английского языка и культурного обмена. https://amc.timepad.ru/event/2519566/
🥰4
Всем привет! Сегодня в программе «50 штатов» произошли изменения. Встреча, посвященная Массачусетсу, переносится на более позднюю дату. Вместо нее сегодня в 20:00 МСК мы с удовольствием покажем повтор одного из самых популярных выпусков серии — беседу о Калифорнии. Мы объявим, когда состоится презентация о штате Массачусетс, как только определим новую дату. YouTube: https://youtube.com/live/qg4vkHWtz38?feature=sh…
❤5
Если бы вы могли посетить одно место в Массачусетсе, что бы вы выбрали?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
❤9
Если бы вы могли посетить одно место в Массачусетсе, что бы вы выбрали? • Бостон • Кейп-Код • Салем • Мартас-Винъярд А если вы хотели бы посетить какое-нибудь другое место в Массачусетсе, расскажите в комментариях, — и зарегистрируйтесь на встречу из серии «50 штатов», которая пройдет на этой неделе: https://amc.timepad.ru/event/3710092/
❤8
Showing the 12 most recent of 28 posts we hold for @amc_moscow. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 4 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Вы читали роман «Великий Гэтсби»?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Если бы вы могли посетить одно место в Массачусетсе, что бы вы выбрали?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Какое качество в спортсменах вы цените больше всего?
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Какое качество, на ваш взгляд, самое важное?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 28 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 7 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 139,164 of 1,480,975entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“American Center in Moscow” (@amc_moscow), 4,080 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/amc_moscow.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.