Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Янтарный комбинат

@ambercombine

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

2,704subscribers

-13 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002000932936
TypeChannel
Username@ambercombine
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 30 April 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/ambercombine

Growth

2,7042,7172,710.56 August 2026 — 2,717 subscribers6 August 2026 — 2,716 subscribers9 August 2026 — 2,709 subscribers12 August 2026 — 2,704 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 6 days, net -13. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,702–2,719 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 09:222,704-5
9 Aug 2026, 17:212,709-7
6 Aug 2026, 21:202,716-1
6 Aug 2026, 05:342,717first reading

Engagement

6 posts held, back to 23 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
19.6%
avg views ÷ 2,704 subscribers
Avg views / post
530
6 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.43%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
6
of 6 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 5 of 6 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held6 (23 July 20267 August 2026)
Views total3,180
Reactions total133
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 16:13 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 11s
Average length
24s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

109 reactions across 4 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
3330.3%
🔥2825.7%
👍1816.5%
🎉87.34%
😍76.42%
🤩43.67%
🍾32.75%
👏32.75%
🤣21.83%
custom 537286485734117284210.917%
🤗10.917%
🥰10.917%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 6 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 133reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 6 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 15:35 UTC175 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @rostecruVideo

🌿 Медведь, барс или зубр? Ростех голосует, присоединяйтесь! Неожиданно, но это не шутка. В Красной книге России – больше тысячи видов растений и животных. Они могут обитать в дикой природе, а могут жить буквально у нас под ногами и летать над крышами городских домов. Но часто ли мы задумываемся о том, что многим из них нужна наша помощь, пока они не оказались на грани исчезновения? Самые уязвимые виды вошли в проек

4 Aug 2026, 19:44 UTC405 views24 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Где искать 50 оттенков серого янтарного… В наших картинах, ведь после серии экспериментов с термической обработкой солнечного камня специалисты увеличили количество оттенков с 3 до 50 без применения красителей. Первые картины, в которых использованы все полученные оттенки - «Гималайский медведь» и «Дальневосточный леопард» - созданы для Музея Уссурийской тайги. Читать дальше… #янтарь #картинаизянтаря #янтарныйко

🔥138🤩2😍1

2 Aug 2026, 09:12 UTC502 views29 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🙂 Ровно два года назад, 2 августа 2024 года, в самом сердце Санкт-Петербурга открылся фирменный магазин Янтарного комбината — первое пространство предприятия в Северной столице. За эти два года магазин стал местом, куда приходят не только за украшениями. Здесь выбирают памятные подарки, находят особенные изделия с историей, знакомятся с современным дизайном и открывают для себя всё разнообразие янтаря. Если вы давн

15🎉8👏3🍾2🥰1

28 Jul 2026, 19:05 UTC680 views30 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Любите брокколи? 🥦 А мы любим янтарь, но именно форму брокколи напомнила наша новая находка. Этот образец каплевидного янтаря имеет редкую форму для этой разновидности камня. С одной его стороны сохранился характерный для капли плавный сферический натек, с другой – янтарь абсолютно плоский. Янтарные капли наряду с инклюзами и самородками считаются одной из уникальных разновидностей балтийского самоцвета. Найденный

👍18😍6🤣2🤩2🍾1🤗1

25 Jul 2026, 11:13 UTC748 views26 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Представьте: в самом центре Москвы можно прикоснуться к истории, которой десятки миллионов лет. Где это? 🤔👇🏼 Интерактивное музейное пространство «Янтарная галерея» 📍 ул. Арбат, д. 23 стр.1 🍃 Это портал в эпоху Эоцена с уникальными инклюзами и редкими самородками. Янтарные артефакты доставлены на Арбат прямиком из Калининрадской области - родины самоцвета. Музей интерактивный. История солнечного камня и технологии

🔥1510custom 53728648573411728421

23 Jul 2026, 19:01 UTC≈670 views24 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

🙂 Калининградский янтарный комбинат* усовершенствовал процесс прессования янтаря-сырца. Технология позволяет смешивать различные оттенки самоцвета и использовать его мелкие фракции в производстве крупных изделий. Новый подход увеличит производительность при создании продукции из этого вида янтарного сырья на 20%. В её основе лежит особенность органического минерала становиться пластичным при нагревании. Высокие тем

Showing the 6 most recent of 6 posts we hold for @ambercombine. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 153,883 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Янтарный комбинат” (@ambercombine), 2,704 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ambercombine.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.