Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for AMANITA✞

Channel

AMANITA✞

@amanitalis

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

28,374subscribers

+111 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001541769284
TypeChannel
Username@amanitalis
Descriptionсотрудничество/реклама/запись на тату @amanitalis_manager (менеджер) ♡ твич http://twitch.tv/amanitaliss ♡ бусти https://boosty.to/amanitalis ♡ второй канал https://t.me/arachnophobia_li типичная анорексичка ♡ мой магазин : https://t.me/peggy_ho_amanita
Created25 February 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live25 September 2026
Measurements held35
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 25 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/amanitalis

Topic

Art & design — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 75% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

28,15528,57328,3647 August 2026 — 28,263 subscribers7 August 2026 — 28,263 subscribers7 August 2026 — 28,244 subscribers8 August 2026 — 28,234 subscribers10 August 2026 — 28,310 subscribers11 August 2026 — 28,359 subscribers12 August 2026 — 28,329 subscribers13 August 2026 — 28,353 subscribers14 August 2026 — 28,318 subscribers15 August 2026 — 28,243 subscribers17 August 2026 — 28,366 subscribers18 August 2026 — 28,475 subscribers19 August 2026 — 28,481 subscribers20 August 2026 — 28,554 subscribers21 August 2026 — 28,547 subscribers22 August 2026 — 28,573 subscribers24 August 2026 — 28,552 subscribers25 August 2026 — 28,453 subscribers26 August 2026 — 28,389 subscribers27 August 2026 — 28,528 subscribers28 August 2026 — 28,513 subscribers29 August 2026 — 28,471 subscribers30 August 2026 — 28,443 subscribers31 August 2026 — 28,412 subscribers1 September 2026 — 28,364 subscribers2 September 2026 — 28,334 subscribers3 September 2026 — 28,298 subscribers4 September 2026 — 28,251 subscribers8 September 2026 — 28,155 subscribers11 September 2026 — 28,168 subscribers13 September 2026 — 28,227 subscribers14 September 2026 — 28,306 subscribers16 September 2026 — 28,346 subscribers18 September 2026 — 28,264 subscribers25 September 2026 — 28,374 subscribers28,3747 August 202625 September 2026
35 measurements spanning 49 days, net +111. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 28,092–28,636 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 35
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
25 Sept 2026, 06:5828,374+110
18 Sept 2026, 20:3828,264-82
16 Sept 2026, 10:0128,346+40
14 Sept 2026, 16:1928,306+79
13 Sept 2026, 03:1528,227+59
11 Sept 2026, 03:3928,168+13
8 Sept 2026, 02:1728,155-96
4 Sept 2026, 22:5928,251-47
3 Sept 2026, 09:5428,298-36
2 Sept 2026, 04:0728,334-30
1 Sept 2026, 04:0428,364-48
31 Aug 2026, 05:5428,412-31
30 Aug 2026, 03:0628,443-28
29 Aug 2026, 04:5328,471-42
28 Aug 2026, 01:5428,513-15
27 Aug 2026, 04:4228,528+139
26 Aug 2026, 06:0328,389-64
25 Aug 2026, 08:5728,453-99
24 Aug 2026, 06:1728,552-21
22 Aug 2026, 16:2428,573first reading

Engagement

150 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 93 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
11.3%
avg views ÷ 28,374 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,210
59 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.79%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
59
of 150 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 September 2026
Posts held150 (3 August 2026 – 29 September 2026)
Views total189,620
Reactions total10,976
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken30 Sept 2026, 01:56 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈7,760
Videos
≈399
Links
≈336

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 30 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
2m 33s
Average length
11s

Measured directly from 14 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

29,177 reactions across 150 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 21.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤6,40121.9%
custom 54088773979089543955,21617.9%
custom 54091578893381532684,53415.5%
custom 54067443410561069144,31014.8%
custom 54070839355302631503,83513.1%
💔2,97810.2%
custom 52425052125638601331,5795.41%
custom 54068374903068203821860.637%
🍓1040.356%
custom 5409179162311172162340.117%

Custom emoji. 7 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 150 of the 150 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 29,177 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 150 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 29 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
55
across the posts below
Posts paid on
23
of 150 we hold a reading for · 15%
Most on one post
15
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @amanitalis. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 150 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 August 2026 to 29 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

29 Sept 2026, 09:25 UTC≈1,640 views143 reactionsread 30 September 2026

не могу работать все мои силы уходят на то чтобы быть прикольной

💔105🍓38

29 Sept 2026, 05:11 UTC≈2,240 views158 reactionsread 30 September 2026

поела рамен, у меня во рту все вибрирует. будто наелась жидкого вибратора…

💔116🍓42

29 Sept 2026, 02:35 UTC≈2,450 views135 reactionsread 30 September 2026
Photo

улетаю 😕 чемодан после парочки перелетов уже выглядит помятым. кто его блин там бьет, ну емае. у меня какой-то загон, что может быть перевес чемодана😳 купила родным подарков, но теперь переживаю, как все увезти :( (у меня до максимума 200-300г осталось 💀)

custom 524250521256386013387💔25🍓23

28 Sept 2026, 15:08 UTC≈2,860 views173 reactionsread 30 September 2026

блин, новым людям так влом что-либо рассказывать. эй, просто прочти мой канал, не задавай глупых вопросов 😳

custom 5242505212563860133106❤36custom 540674434105610691423custom 54088773979089543958

28 Sept 2026, 12:11 UTC≈2,910 views153 reactions1 Starread 30 September 2026

когда мне грустно, включаю мистера бина и задыхаюсь от смеха. может кому-то это тоже покажется веселым, но обычно смеялась я одна…

❤107custom 540887739790895439521💔18custom 54067443410561069147

28 Sept 2026, 05:51 UTC≈3,200 views209 reactionsread 30 September 2026
Video

какие они крутые 👸 если у вас когда нибудь возникнет возможность их покормить, сделайте это. рядом со мной вы видите маленьких фламинго, но были и очень высокие, вытянувшись во весь рост, они достигали моего роста😌 забавный факт: в шанхае за денежку в зоопарке можно сфоткаться и покормить голубей. а еще в самом шанхае я видела их всего 2 раза… говорят тут их кушают, но я не верю.

❤151💔27custom 524250521256386013322custom 54067443410561069147🍓1custom 54088773979089543951

27 Sept 2026, 16:17 UTC≈3,210 views233 reactionsread 30 September 2026
Video

последние дни в китае и улетаю дальше 💀 постараюсь сделать крутые фотки в этом платье, пока тут.

custom 5242505212563860133132❤70custom 540674434105610691424custom 54088773979089543956💔1

27 Sept 2026, 15:42 UTC≈3,230 views191 reactionsread 30 September 2026

вчера у отца было день рождения и день, когда моя семья разрушилась официально 😌

💔139custom 540887739790895439522❤16custom 54067443410561069148custom 52425052125638601336

27 Sept 2026, 12:21 UTC≈3,460 views257 reactionsread 30 September 2026
Photo

поругались. я очень обижена и разочарована. больше не говорим.

❤163💔51custom 540674434105610691428custom 524250521256386013312custom 54088773979089543953

27 Sept 2026, 11:10 UTC≈3,520 views51 reactionsread 30 September 2026

Posted without readable text

❤29custom 540887739790895439512custom 540674434105610691410

27 Sept 2026, 10:02 UTC≈3,380 views263 reactionsread 30 September 2026
Photo

фиолетовое платье ➖ на носки мои не обращаем внимания💀 в ком кину без фильтра цвет.

custom 5242505212563860133159❤62custom 540674434105610691434💔7custom 54088773979089543951

27 Sept 2026, 08:59 UTC≈3,440 views190 reactionsread 30 September 2026

👸понравилось китайское платье, но оно оказалось большим. девушка оказалась швеей и предложила его подшить под меня. теперь у меня потрясающее платье моего размера. прикиньте, оно не черное и не белое 😳

custom 5408877397908954395112❤40custom 524250521256386013326custom 540674434105610691412

Showing the 12 most recent of 150 posts we hold for @amanitalis. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

типичная анорексичка 2015
@tipichnayaanorexiaa · 88,569
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 36 here — alongside 35 others — read 7 September 2026
рпп - это моя жизнь
@anorppexia · 25,664
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 36 here — alongside 35 others — read 14 September 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“AMANITA✞” (@amanitalis), 28,374 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/amanitalis.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.