that chinese ticker I called went 10x btw, I printed only 2x on it though

Channel
Amandyks trades
@amandykstg
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
76subscribers
+57 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1003981445154 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @amandykstg |
| Created | Between 1 April 2026 and 7 August 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 9 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/amandykstg |
Topic
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 29 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Oct 2026, 12:37 | 76 | +4 |
| 1 Oct 2026, 03:00 | 72 | +14 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 10:02 | 58 | +5 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 10:41 | 53 | +14 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 00:54 | 39 | +11 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 19:14 | 28 | +2 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 17:56 | 26 | +7 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 17:46 | 19 | no change |
| 9 Aug 2026, 09:47 | 19 | first reading |
Engagement
19 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Recent posts
wasnt at home at all today and just came back. Got a notif that this position is up and just dumped it on phone. Also overall balance is at $1.7k, up $750 from the start of challenge few days ago. Waiting for $eloncoin and $unicorn to go way way higher
fartcoin of pons $TAMPONS should be at least at 500k I believe
pons 40m
0xc9e7c34fa156a235e8b8601171a543bc9c84a1b9
$eloncoin. was up $200 on this one at some point but didnt fully TP, back to my entry on challenge acc and also bought more on my side as R/R is insane here, if it runs its 10x+ min.
0x499c573997a1382f4051ece45b3d6b2f0e317777
forgot to call it here but actually had some kind of conviction in this one. I probably need to just send every CA imma buying to here
was an onchain rape day for me today, ate shit on sides but on challenge acc nothing changed. Rotated between coins too much, made two 2x trades but it was wiped out with other L trades. Dont have a conviction in anything (from lowcaps) atm so nothing to share.
pons x index. both are up good today and strong ASFUCK. $TREX coin run on all other chains and launcpads so why not here
another trade like chud
0xb2583b748ab5cc410975ed859c5569ee2435bc3d
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @amandykstg. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Amandyks trades” (@amandykstg), 76 subscribers as measured 12 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/amandykstg.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.