Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Amalgama | Междисциплинарная учебная платформа

@amalgama660

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

4,549subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001372160844
TypeChannel
Username@amalgama660
DescriptionПервая образовательная платформа, где западная оккультная традиция изучается как единая интеллектуальная система, объединяющая философию, психологию, мифологию, историю культуры и духовную практику. 🌐 https://amalgama660.ru ✉️ @Yuliya_Trusova
Created27 January 2021measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/amalgama660

Growth

4,5484,5504,5497 August 2026 — 4,548 subscribers8 August 2026 — 4,550 subscribers10 August 2026 — 4,549 subscribers7 August 202610 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 4 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,548–4,550 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 17:114,549-1
8 Aug 2026, 01:064,550+2
7 Aug 2026, 01:474,548first reading

Engagement

30 posts held, back to 28 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 7 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
7.81%
avg views ÷ 4,549 subscribers
Avg views / post
355
26 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.55%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
30
of 30 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 23 of 26 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held30 (28 July 202612 August 2026)
Views total9,241
Reactions total288
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 06:43 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
3,000
Videos
50
Links
1,970

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
1m 35s
Average length
1m 35s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

288 reactions across 23 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤‍🔥13446.5%
👍7225.0%
custom 54204990683108145764314.9%
custom 5422504367066478708248.33%
👀155.21%

Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 23 of the 30 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 288reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 30 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 05:36 UTC73 views4 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Ловлю эстетическое удовольствие от нашего Инстаграм. Там кроме всего прочего регулярные рилсы с лучшими моментами эфиров. Так что заходите.

❤‍🔥4

Signed Юлия Трусова

11 Aug 2026, 13:47 UTC228 views2 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Чтобы не пропустить эфир - зайдите на канал и нажмите на кнопку "прислать уведомление", чтобы Ютюб вас оповестил о начале. Или не удаляйте уведомление, чтобы посмотреть в записи по этой же ссылке. Очень полезная функция.

custom 54204990683108145762

Signed Юлия Трусова

11 Aug 2026, 13:43 UTC162 viewsread 12 August 2026
Poll

На какой из трех открытых эфиров вы обязательно пойдёте?

  1. Про ЧСВ в магии. Актуалочка.18%
  2. Духи места и астральные миры. Давно интересуюсь.57%
  3. Юнг и Пифагор: число как архетип. Буду наслаждаться мыслью.11%
  4. На все пойду или посмотрю в записи.43%
  5. Как ни странно, меня не заинтересовал ни один.0%

The shares total 129%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Signed Юлия Трусова

11 Aug 2026, 13:31 UTC228 views3 reactionsread 12 August 2026

🌚В воскресенье 16го августа в 18.00 по Москве Екатерина Дайс проведет открытый эфир "Юнг и Пифагор. Число как архетип". Пифагор был первым, кто сказал это вслух: всё есть число. И сделал открытие, от которого до сих пор кружится голова, услышав, что гармония, которую различает ухо, стоит на простых отношениях чисел. Октава, квинта, кварта: красоту можно сосчитать. Число не выдумали и не навязали миру, его в нем нашл

❤‍🔥3

Signed Smmboxbot

11 Aug 2026, 13:01 UTC145 views7 reactionsread 12 August 2026

❤️ В субботу 15го августа в 18.00 пройдет эфир Козуба Сергея по демонологии и Западной Магии на тему "Опыт взаимодействия с духами места и обитателями астральных миров ". В программе: 🤍 Интересные случаи из многолетнего опыта в эвокации. 🤍 Взаимодействие с иерархиями духов места. ▪️ Получение имен и сигилл духов и их верификация. 🤍 Посещение астральных миров и их особенности. 🤍 Что роднит место и астральный мир? Вы

❤‍🔥7

Signed Smmboxbot

11 Aug 2026, 09:23 UTC191 views5 reactionsread 12 August 2026

❤️Чувство собственной важности в магической практике может оказаться палкой о двух концах. Когда оно помогает, а когда начинает мешать? Где проходит эта граница — и всегда ли практик способен её заметить? ❤️В пятницу в 18.00 по Москве Алиса Пушкина поговорит о ЧСВ в магической практике, поделится примерами из личного опыта и собственными наработками. 🤍Без отвлечённых рассуждений и готовых рецептов — честный разгово

👍3❤‍🔥2

Signed Smmboxbot

11 Aug 2026, 07:45 UTC198 views11 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Сегодня мы опубликуем анонсы трёх потрясающих эфиров от трёх разных спикеров. Пятница-суббота-воскресенье. Будут жаркие интересные выходные.

❤‍🔥8👍3

Signed Smmboxbot

11 Aug 2026, 06:46 UTC205 views8 reactionsread 12 August 2026

‍👀А что, если проблема не в том, что вы «не умеете работать с ангелами», а в том, что вам никто не показал систему целиком? Мы уже несколько недель говорим об истории ангелов. И чем глубже мы идём, тем очевиднее становится одна вещь: западная ангелология никогда не была набором красивых имён и картинок с крыльями. За ней стоит огромная архитектура. ❤️Иерархии. ❤️Сфирот. ❤️Планетарные соответствия. ❤️Зодиакальные се

❤‍🔥5👍3

Signed Smmboxbot

10 Aug 2026, 11:01 UTC142 views18 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @demonology_woccultismVideo

Битва экстрасенсов, эзотерика в СНГ и ДЕГоверс. Тут распространилось видео с нарезкой из интервью Александра Александровича Жарова, генерального директора холдинга «Газпром-Медиа», в котором он рассказывает корпоративное по факту мнение относительно шоу "Битва Экстрасенсов". Где прямо заявляет, что это самый рейтинговый продукт, в котором снимаются актеры и рассчитанный на самые слабые и глупые слои населения.

❤‍🔥9👀5custom 54225043670664787084

Signed Юлия Трусова

10 Aug 2026, 10:41 UTC250 views8 reactionsread 12 August 2026
File

#раскраски Автор: https://t.me/amalgama660

custom 54204990683108145768

Signed Юлия Трусова

10 Aug 2026, 10:40 UTC238 views15 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Маленькая алхимия случилась. 🖤 Мы превратили эстетику «Амальгамы» в раскраски. И теперь предлагаем вам вдохнуть в них цвет. Распечатайте на плотной бумаге, выберите свои оттенки и позвольте образу ожить именно таким, каким его видите вы. Здесь нет «правильных» цветов — только ваша фантазия, настроение и личная магия. Файл для распечатки прикреплён ниже. И обязательно покажите нам результат! Делитесь фотографиями

❤‍🔥15

Signed Smmboxbot

10 Aug 2026, 10:08 UTC250 views20 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Пришла в голову сумасшедшая идея. Хотим сделать раскраску в стиле Амальгамы со всей нашей эстетикой: алхимия, готика, атмосфера, глубина, античность, совершенство линий. Сегодня выложим первые черно-белые эскизы. Можно будет распечатать и раскрасить.

👍12❤‍🔥8

Signed Smmboxbot

Showing the 12 most recent of 30 posts we hold for @amalgama660. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

11 Aug 2026, 13:43 UTCAnonymous Poll28 voters

На какой из трех открытых эфиров вы обязательно пойдёте?

  1. Про ЧСВ в магии. Актуалочка.18%
  2. Духи места и астральные миры. Давно интересуюсь.57%
  3. Юнг и Пифагор: число как архетип. Буду наслаждаться мыслью.11%
  4. На все пойду или посмотрю в записи.43%
  5. Как ни странно, меня не заинтересовал ни один.0%

The shares total 129%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

4 Aug 2026, 09:33 UTCAnonymous Poll47 voters

Сколько ночей страшных сказок сделаем?

  1. 🩸 🩸Две ночи. Выдержу концентрат9%
  2. 🩸🩸🩸 Три ночи. Ничего не вырезать57%
  3. Даёшь неделю!30%
  4. Не нравится тема. не пойду.4%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 30 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 12 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 107,163 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Amalgama | Междисциплинарная учебная платформа” (@amalgama660), 4,549 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/amalgama660.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.