Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ammonia

Channel

ammonia

@am110ni

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

106subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003608436293
TypeChannel
Username@am110ni
CreatedBetween 1 December 2025 and 7 April 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/am110ni

Growth

106107106.511 August 2026 — 107 subscribers11 August 2026 — 107 subscribers17 August 2026 — 106 subscribers11 August 202617 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 7 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 106–107 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Aug 2026, 20:35106-1
11 Aug 2026, 13:41107no change
11 Aug 2026, 04:46107first reading

Engagement

13 posts held, back to 7 April 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 13 posts for this entry, the most recent from 18 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

564 reactions across 12 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 19.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 587496499401302071910719.0%
custom 587725324091916675910518.6%
custom 587775957890865931610518.6%
custom 58776590895588350366311.2%
custom 52562313181565118755910.5%
custom 5877358798330401499468.16%
custom 5875404781484249067244.26%
custom 5877250659643821584203.55%
custom 5255727973759226388183.19%
custom 5877678266587811299162.84%
custom 522657559976977659710.177%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 564reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 7 April 2026 to 18 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
4
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 12 we hold a reading for · 25%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @am110ni. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 13 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 7 April 2026 to 18 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

18 Jul 2026, 09:07 UTC138 views14 reactionsread 11 August 2026

Что ещё кроме окегома существует прикольное интересное я хз че рисовать прост

custom 587496499401302071914

18 Jul 2026, 09:05 UTC135 views44 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

ахахахаххаха привет медвед хахаха ой все блчть

custom 587725324091916675921custom 587765908955883503610custom 587775957890865931610custom 58749649940130207193

6 Jun 2026, 10:55 UTC294 views46 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Скетчи прона давно здесь не было кстати, возможно пора начать исправлять ситуацию

custom 587496499401302071918custom 587725324091916675912custom 587775957890865931610custom 58776590895588350366

3 Jun 2026, 05:47 UTC318 views51 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

hi hello hiiii:3 Новелльное + опять нагота с щп

custom 587496499401302071921custom 587725324091916675913custom 587775957890865931610custom 58776590895588350367

13 May 2026, 17:16 UTC311 views71 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

По памяти микрочелов рисовала, инета не было так что насрать, мне лень исправлять 👎

custom 587725324091916675927custom 587775957890865931620custom 587765908955883503617custom 58749649940130207197

8 May 2026, 19:01 UTC313 views58 reactions1 Starread 11 August 2026
Photo

Картинка в аск + прколюхи с щп....😋

custom 587725324091916675920custom 587765908955883503614custom 587775957890865931614custom 587496499401302071910

26 Apr 2026, 17:44 UTC366 views55 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

В аск..

custom 587496499401302071925custom 587725324091916675912custom 587775957890865931610custom 58776590895588350368

22 Apr 2026, 12:21 UTC373 views64 reactions1 Starread 11 August 2026
Photo

Фем Лек Следующая ш*рогане

custom 587735879833040149922custom 587775957890865931617custom 587540478148424906712custom 587725065964382158410custom 58749649940130207192custom 52265755997697765971

22 Apr 2026, 09:05 UTC286 views14 reactionsread 11 August 2026

Че или кого мне нарисовать any ideas anyone???

custom 587767826658781129910custom 58749649940130207192custom 58772506596438215842

22 Apr 2026, 09:00 UTC327 views65 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Встань нормально дура ❌

custom 587735879833040149924custom 587775957890865931614custom 587540478148424906712custom 58772506596438215848custom 58776782665878112996custom 58776590895588350361

7 Apr 2026, 16:28 UTC442 views15 reactionsread 11 August 2026

Да я шучу я всё равно не буду их рисовать

custom 525623131815651187513custom 58749649940130207192

Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @am110ni. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,375,042 of 1,568,528entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ammonia” (@am110ni), 106 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/am110ni.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.