Channel
@alyonas_reflexion
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
18subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002450343366 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @alyonas_reflexion |
| Description | Делюсь своим миром и мыслями |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/alyonas_reflexion |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 17:46 | 18 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 18:31 | 18 | first reading |
13 posts held, back to 20 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 13 (20 May 2026 – 10 August 2026) |
| Views total | 110 |
| Reactions total | 15 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 11 Aug 2026, 17:46 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
87 reactions across 12 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 39 | 44.8% | |
| ❤ | 25 | 28.7% | |
| 👍 | 14 | 16.1% | |
| ⚡ | 5 | 5.75% | |
| 🌚 | 2 | 2.30% | |
| 🎉 | 1 | 1.15% | |
| 🤯 | 1 | 1.15% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 87reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 20 May 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Судорожно собираю моушн-работки в шоу-рил и обморочно доделываю проект по визуальному программированию, попутно делая тестовые задания Это лето совсем мимо меня прошло, но зато вот теперь еще как умею) music: Louisahhh!!! — Change
🔥2❤1
На курсе по визуальному программированию был маленький блок по 3D, осилила его только со второго захода, на первом у меня тупо мозг вскипел) В итоге откаллиграфировала, затридешила и обработала в Тачдизайнере себе логос 👁
❤3🔥1🤯1
Как финалисту моушен-конкурса мне все-таки даровали проходку на курс, безумно рада, но мозгу больно и головы из-за компа не поднимаю с утра до ночи. Но вот уже есть неплохие результаты, заанимировала иллюстрацию Паши Dope, моего куратора на нейрокурсе. Видение Паши на меня в целом сильно повлияло 🖤
🔥4❤2👍1
────────────────────────────────────── 𝔖ℌ𝔒𝔏𝔒𝔗ℭℌ ℭ𝔒𝔑𝔗𝔈𝔖𝔗 ⚔️ ──────────────────────────────────────
👍3❤2🌚2
Возобновила каллиграфическую практику 🖤 Почему-то каллиграфы не особо используют цветную бумагу, а зря, даже простые композиции как у меня сразу выглядят более стайлово)
🔥5❤2👍1
Конкурсная работа, на великий моушн не претендую, но тут можно было участвовать на новичковом по туториалу, главное концепт. Постаралась впихнуть драматургию в 10 секунд) Внезапно прошла в тройку финалистов, хотя среди участников были прям моушн-профики. Пусть не победила, но приятновое)
🔥3❤2👍1
Учусь на курсе по визуально-мультимедийному программированию в Touchdesigner, на который я выиграла проходку. Первая домашка была сделать постер. Мозг скрипел + я намудрила со слоями и афигела это всё потом собирать. Вечно что-то улетало и не так отображалось, но после всех мучений интересная вышла штука.
🔥4❤2🎉1
Вписалась делать творческие штуки для канала Хром. Это канал в поддержку бота Хромик для генераций прямо в Телеге. Мне нравится даркушная эстетика канала, можно поделать всякое странное. Вот обработала лого для канала в нейронках и сделала каллиграфическую надпись для Хромик форума
❤2👍2🔥2
Решила по приколу вписаться на кастинг на студенческий показ в Вышке) Не ожидала, что на кастинге будет стооолько народу, кто-то обсуждал моделинг в Китае, кто-то поделился, что кастинг у Гоши Рубчинского был скучный, даж походить не дали, и я такая🗿 В итоге меня позвали на защиту дипломных работ у бакалавров. Вышла в коллекциях у 3 молодых дарований. В одном выходе молилась чтоб с меня не свалилось платье, застегн…
👍3🔥3❤1
Участвовала в челлендже по созданию анимированного постера. Надо было обработать свой постер по туториалам. Мечтала такие штуки научиться делать, для меня это всегда было чем-то на очень топовом. Иии... я выиграла! :3 Вообще в последние полгода я себя очень здорово прокачала и мне все больше нравится то, что в итоге получается)
🔥4❤3👍1
Мне выпала счастливая возможность поволонтерить на батлах по хай-хилс, а взамен поучаствовать на классах и самой выйти побатлить. Это мой первый выход в хилсовые батлы, дальше по сетке не прошла, но главное себя выпнуть и не умереть от паники) Образ слепила из того, что было, но вышло даже убедительно, наверное с детства косички не заплетала)
⚡5🔥3❤2
Мама, я на Озоне В продажу вышла колода метафорических карт с моими первыми генками (которые я делала еще плохо соображая в настройках Миджа) в стиле славянского кибер-панка) А на обратной стороне карт напечатаны разные психологические премудрости, коробочку издательство делало само, уж какая есть, мне всё равно радостно :3
🔥8❤3👍2
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @alyonas_reflexion. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 397,454 of 1,481,306entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Алёна дизайнит и рефлексирует” (@alyonas_reflexion), 18 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/alyonas_reflexion.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.