Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for قناة عبدالله بن عبيد الطوياوي.

Channel

قناة عبدالله بن عبيد الطوياوي.

@altwaya

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

1,037subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 9 September 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001495780156
TypeChannel
Username@altwaya
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 September 2026
Last confirmed live15 September 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/altwaya

Growth

1,0371,0391,0389 September 2026 — 1,037 subscribers9 September 2026 — 1,037 subscribers11 September 2026 — 1,039 subscribers15 September 2026 — 1,037 subscribers9 September 202615 September 2026
4 measurements spanning 6 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,037–1,039 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Sept 2026, 11:001,037-2
11 Sept 2026, 17:591,039+2
9 Sept 2026, 12:221,037no change
9 Sept 2026, 11:471,037first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 6 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
12.5%
avg views ÷ 1,037 subscribers
Avg views / post
130
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.38%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
3
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 3 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 September 2026
Posts held20 (6 May 20263 September 2026)
Views total390
Reactions total2
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken9 Sept 2026, 12:22 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
59m 30s
Average length
59m 30s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

28 reactions across 13 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 96.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
2796.4%
👍13.57%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 28 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 6 May 2026 to 3 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

3 Sept 2026, 13:26 UTC84 views2 reactionsread 9 September 2026

‏الاستخارة في المسائل العلمية. ‏قال الشافعي: وقد قيل في الحلي صدقة -أي زكاة-، وهذا مما أستخير الله عزوجل فيه. ‏قال تلميذه الربيع: قد استخار الله عزوجل فيه. ‏ثم رجح عدم وجوب الزكاة فيها وهو يقول: لازكاة فيه في قول من لم ير في الحلي زكاة! ‏مابين تردد الأئمة الكبار وجرأة الصغار يستبين لك المنهج الحق وتتربى نفسك على التواضع. ‏وللفائدة: ‏زكاة الحلي واجبة عند ابن باز وابن عثيمين وفاقا لأبي حنيفة وهو رواية عن أحمد.

2

29 Aug 2026, 06:28 UTC160 viewsread 9 September 2026

‏عقول الناس تهوى الإغراب وتتستهين بالسائد المشهور، مع أن العلماء من كل فن ديني ودنيوي يعظمون السائد ويتهمون الغريب، جاء رجال للإمام البخاري فذكروا له حديثا فقال: لا أعرفه! ‏فذهبوا لشيخهم فرحين أنهم يعرفون حديثا لا يعرفه البخاري، فقال لهم: حديث لا يعرفه محمد بن إسماعيل ليس بحديث!. ‏وأبو داود في رسالته لأهل مكة قال: والأحاديث التي وضعتها في "كتاب السنن" أكثرها مشاهير… والفخر بها أنها مشاهير. ‏لكن لأن الناس مولعون بالإغ

27 Aug 2026, 16:57 UTC146 viewsread 9 September 2026

‏مابين تذليل العلم لمريديه وابتذاله لكل أحد خيط رفيع، ومع أنها قد تكون مشتبهة إلا أن هناك فرق بينهما كبير يظهر في مرحلة متأخرة، وهو: أن التذليل يجد الطالب فيه صعوبة ومعالجة في البدء لكن الأمر يسهل عليه إذا تقدم، والمبتذَل له يسهل عليه الأمر في المبتدأ فإذا وصل الخبر فإذا هو لم يُفطم بعد ثم يتوقف فلا هو الذي يستطيع مواصلة التقدم ولا هو يتواضع للرجوع والبدء من جديد. وضرب الشيخ عبدالكريم الخضير مثالا في إحدى محاضراته ب

21 Aug 2026, 12:10 UTC216 viewsread 9 September 2026

https://x.com/wasaat1/status/2088980893129953376?s=46&t=hepSpbGcyaFIuX57twvquQ

21 Aug 2026, 12:10 UTC201 views2 reactionsread 9 September 2026
Photo

لكل من يريد الخطوة الأولى في طلب العلم هذه بداية لك. ومن يعرف أحدا يريد البداية فليدله عليها وله مثل أجره بإذن الله.

1👍1

9 Aug 2026, 08:53 UTC277 views1 reactionsread 9 September 2026

‏الشيخ صالح العصيمي له شرح لفضل الإسلام والأربعون النووية في مدينة حائل، استطرد فيهما استطرادات نافعة وماتعة ووعظ فيهما مواعظ مؤثرة، إن استطعت سماعهما فاستمع لهما واستعن بالله ولا تعجز. https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLMESC_UFcDHLREYBF9sqmML1qQBMAbo91

1

29 Jul 2026, 10:14 UTC351 views3 reactionsread 9 September 2026

‏على أن كثرة الشيوخ فيها مافيها من الفوائد، لكن ربما تستفيد من الشيخ الواحد مالا تستفيده من عشرة؛ قيل لطاوس: أدركتَ أصحاب محمد ﷺ ثم انقطعت إلى ابن عباس! ‏فقال: أدركت سبعين من أصحاب محمد ﷺ إذا تدارؤوا في شيء انتهَوا إلى قول ابن عباس. ‏فتنويع الشيوخ إن لم يكن فيه كبير فائدة احبس نفسك على شيخ أو شيخين أقل أو أكثر ممن تتوفر فيهم هذه الصفة، التحقيق والتحرير والموسوعية، كما كان ابن عباس -رضي الله عنهما-؛ قال عطاء: ‏"ما رأ

3

16 Jul 2026, 12:04 UTC345 viewsread 9 September 2026
Forwarded from @llill195lFile

File, posted without a caption

9 Jul 2026, 20:01 UTC413 views1 reactionsread 9 September 2026

‏المذهبية طريقك لفقه الدليل| ⁧ #بكر_أبوزيد⁩. ‏قال رحمه الله: ‏"أمام هذه الثروة الفقهية، حصلت حركة تدوينية، قام بها عدد من الأصحاب - كالشأن في أتباع كل مذهب متبوع ـ بعمل مداخل فقهية لكل مذهب تَضْبِطُهُ أصلاً، وفرعًا، وَتَرْسِمُ طَرِيقَهُ، رواية وتخريجًا، وتعرف بكتبه، ومراتبها، وعلمائه، ومراتبهم، وطبقاتهم فيه، اجتهادًا، وتقليدًا... إلى آخر ما هنالك من معارف ومعالم، تَعْنِي المتفقه، وَتَرْسِمُ طريقه فيه؛ حتى يعرف المذه

1

18 Jun 2026, 10:47 UTC421 views2 reactionsread 9 September 2026

‏المسألة الأولى: ‏الفرق بين الماء المستعمل في الطهارة الواجبة والمستحبة. ‏في الطهارة الواجبة: يُسلب الطهورية. ‏في الطهارة المستحبة: لا يسلب الطهورية. ‏فإن قيل لماذا لم يسلبوا طهورية الماء المستعمل في طهارة مستحبة وسلبوا طهوريته في المستعمل برفع حدث؟ ‏الجواب: أن نص الحديث جاء بالاغتسال الواجب فقال: "وهو جنب" ولم يأتي النهي عن الاغتسال المستحب. ‏والأمر الثاني: أن القياس كان في أن الماء المستعمل لرفع الحدث أزال وصفا م

2

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @altwaya. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

9 Jun 2026, 16:15 UTCFinal Results32 voters

لو أردنا شرح كتاب تفضلون

  1. زاد المستقنع47%
  2. الروض المربع53%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 6 May 2026 to 3 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

حلقات المسجد النبوي
@Halagat_The_Mosuque_of_Prophet · 56,533
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 9 September 2026
المجالس القرآنية
@majals_quran · 28,791
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 12 September 2026
PATHOMA VIDEOS
@pathomaavideos · 140,173
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 10 September 2026
قناة الشيخ ناصر القطامي
@nasseralqtami · 27,535
Telegram ranks this channel #79 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 10 September 2026

This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“قناة عبدالله بن عبيد الطوياوي.” (@altwaya), 1,037 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/altwaya.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.