Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Валерия, ду ю спик? | Английский с А2

Channel

Валерия, ду ю спик? | Английский с А2

@alteyv

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Cite this entry

204subscribers

+2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001945210138
TypeChannel
Username@alteyv
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live27 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 27 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/alteyv

Growth

201204202.57 August 2026 — 202 subscribers8 August 2026 — 201 subscribers8 August 2026 — 201 subscribers14 August 2026 — 202 subscribers27 August 2026 — 204 subscribers7 August 202627 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 20 days, net +2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 201–204 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
27 Aug 2026, 05:46204+2
14 Aug 2026, 14:38202+1
8 Aug 2026, 11:31201no change
8 Aug 2026, 02:08201-1
7 Aug 2026, 15:37202first reading

Engagement

13 posts held, back to 11 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
14.2%
avg views ÷ 204 subscribers
Avg views / post
29.0
1 post measured
Reaction rate
17.2%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 13 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 August 2026
Posts held13 (11 July 20264 August 2026)
Views total29
Reactions total5
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 11:31 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 22s
Average length
1m 22s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

48 reactions across 7 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 22.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 54745412158672473771122.9%
custom 5188316662457213238714.6%
😁714.6%
custom 521341795457359044848.33%
48.33%
🤣48.33%
custom 521292667903440528436.25%
custom 521299171342919969236.25%
custom 521337600992297764624.17%
custom 529671066336681373524.17%
👍12.08%

Custom emoji. 7 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 48reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 11 July 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

4 Aug 2026, 07:35 UTC29 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

#memetime друзья англичане 🤓 Разрываемся и забираем лексику: 📍witness protection — программа защиты свидетелей 📍rn = right now 📍 controversial opinion — спорное мнение 📍season — специи, to season — добавлять специи ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ Теперь расчехляйте вы свои мемы, будьте милосердны 🫴 #лол@alteyv

😁2🤣1custom 52967106633668137351custom 54745412158672473771

30 Jul 2026, 07:35 UTC59 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Пост для любопытных 🐶 Есть такое правило: ставь артикль the перед уникальнейшими объектами: 📍the sun 📍the moon 📍the Earth 📍the Universe 📍the Internet Всё логично? И я так думаю 🧐 Но вчера моя ученица спросила меня: Если Earth, Moon, Sun – это имена, то почему там вообще есть артикль? Мы ведь не говорим the Voronezh или the Valerie. Как же я люблю правильные вопросы 😍 Объясняю! 🌍 Earth – не имя нашей планеты; на

custom 54745412158672473776custom 52129266790344052842custom 52129917134291996921custom 52134179545735904481

23 Jul 2026, 16:22 UTC98 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Каждый должен пережить эту травму: terrific ≠ terrifying На самом деле в 17-м веке terrific вместе с сёстрами terrible и terrifying образовались от terror и все трое имели окрас ужаса. Конкретно terrific означало inspiring terror, то есть вселяющий ужас. Но как водится со временем слово обрастало всё новыми слоями, пока inspiring terror не превратилось в inspiring awe (awe is a complex emotion of great respect wit

custom 51883166624572132383custom 52129266790344052841custom 52133760099229776461custom 52134179545735904481custom 54745412158672473771

18 Jul 2026, 10:48 UTC105 viewsread 8 August 2026
Poll

Сколько баллов забираешь за эту слоняру? 💪💪💪

  1. 1-2: я рад(а), что попробовал(а)😈0%
  2. 3: защитил(а) свой В1 ☺️0%
  3. 5: чё могу! 😳0%

Shares as published, totalling 0%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

18 Jul 2026, 10:32 UTC62 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026

🍷 Ancient 🍷 Egyptian 🍷 Medicine ☕️Ancient Egyptian medicine was advanced for its time and laid the foundation for many modern practices. Egyptians believed the body was a system of channels similar to the Nile River. Illness was thought to be caused by blockages in these channels, like a blocked canal causing flooding. Treatments focused on unblocking channels using herbal remedies and physical interventions. ☕️On

2custom 52133760099229776461

18 Jul 2026, 10:19 UTC58 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

💽💽 TOEFL 💽💽 Academic Passage Мы уже решили первое задание тойфла вот здесь и второе вот здесь. Сегодня пробуем последнее задание в Reading Section. В Academic Passage нас просят прочесть текст и ответить на вопросы к нему – вроде так просто. В реальности тексты там такие суровые, что 5 минут ты будешь только перечитывать эти полстранички и звать мамочку 🥲 Но! Я придумала рассортировать вопросы на маленькие, средн

2👍1custom 51883166624572132381custom 52129917134291996921custom 54745412158672473771

16 Jul 2026, 14:35 UTC65 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Я откажу вам в обучении, если – моя версия 🐕 За шесть лет преподавания я каких только приколов не повидала: 📍офлайн-уроки в 8 утра 📍ученика, просившего 5 занятий в неделю 📍и даже пранковый пробный урок 🫩 В итоге я озлобилась 😠 Шучу – выстроила границы и правила, которые не обсуждаются 🤨 Про них и рассказала ⬆️ ✴️✴️✴️✴️✴️✴️✴️✴️✴️✴️✴️✴️ Если тебя не отталкивают такие правила, приходи ко мне на бесплатную консульта

custom 54745412158672473772😁1custom 51883166624572132381custom 52129917134291996921custom 52967106633668137351

Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @alteyv. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

18 Jul 2026, 10:48 UTCAnonymous Poll1 voter

Сколько баллов забираешь за эту слоняру? 💪💪💪

  1. 1-2: я рад(а), что попробовал(а)😈0%
  2. 3: защитил(а) свой В1 ☺️0%
  3. 5: чё могу! 😳0%

Shares as published, totalling 0%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 11 July 2026 to 4 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Валерия, ду ю спик? | Английский с А2” (@alteyv), 204 subscribers as measured 27 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/alteyv.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.