Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for alter ego

Channel

alter ego

@alteregofoundation

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

991subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003050498465
TypeChannel
Username@alteregofoundation
CreatedBetween 1 August 2025 and 31 October 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/alteregofoundation

Growth

991992991.56 August 2026 — 992 subscribers6 August 2026 — 992 subscribers13 August 2026 — 991 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 7 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 991–992 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 11:35991-1
6 Aug 2026, 13:19992no change
6 Aug 2026, 05:21992first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 20 December 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
61.4%
avg views ÷ 991 subscribers
Avg views / post
608
1 post measured
Reaction rate
2.47%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 21 July 2026
Posts held19 (20 December 202521 July 2026)
Views total608
Reactions total15
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 13:19 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

357 reactions across 16 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 58.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
20758.0%
👍4412.3%
😁3710.4%
🏆154.20%
💯123.36%
🤡92.52%
🥱71.96%
🐳61.68%
😈51.40%
🗿30.84%
🤔30.84%
🤯30.84%
🖕20.56%
😢20.56%
🌭10.28%
🔥10.28%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 357reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 20 December 2025 to 21 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

21 Jul 2026, 09:51 UTC608 views15 reactionsread 6 August 2026

back to work. щитпост снова открыт для новых людей, для тех кто знает о каком щитпосте речь - обьяснять что-то нет смысла для тех кто не знает: у нас коммьюнити живущее уже 2+ года, живущее как в периоды бычки так и в период медвежки, куча умных людей, ежедневные обсуждения как работы так и жизни и еще куча всего в данный момент в основном торгуем фьючи/опционы/спот/полик ну и депаем во все интересное, дефай к сожа

15

19 Jul 2026, 13:29 UTC728 views29 reactionsread 6 August 2026

полимаркет забанен в вашей стране? это фича а не баг. все мы знаем что трейдинг на пампфане это дико-минусовая движуха, абсолютно лудоманская, в которой зарабатывает лишь малый процент людей и то большинство из этого "малого процента людей" это инсайдеры данные таковы: больше тысячи долларов заработали: 1-3% кошельков когда как на полимаркете, всего 2% кошельков имеют РЕАЛИЗОВАННУЮ прибыль более тысячи долларов и

😁25👍31

4 Jul 2026, 18:06 UTC≈1,190 views22 reactionsread 6 August 2026

если вы на 100% в стейблах(или допустим 90-95%) покупайте колл опционы!, смесь из краткосрочных, среднесрочных, долгосрочных опционов обеспечит вам хорошую выпуклость на стейбловый(почти весь)портфель с учетом того что вы полностью вышли из активов(тоесть РОСТ вы считаете скорее за tail риск а не за "предсказуемый евент" иначе бы не сидели в стейблах) а в случае если большинство из ваших уплаченных премий сгорят в но

15🤔3🐳2🌭1🤡1

4 Jun 2026, 17:11 UTC≈1,530 views9 reactionsread 6 August 2026

https://www.paulgraham.com/greatwork.html

👍9

29 May 2026, 07:27 UTC≈1,830 viewsread 6 August 2026
Poll

Sentiment check

  1. Bullish44%
  2. Bearish59%

The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

22 May 2026, 04:48 UTC≈1,980 views17 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @fmsokolov

Забавно наблюдать за сферой финансов, особенно за великими деятелями такой культуры. Все мы знаем что нынешние богатые это хвосты распределения, хотя они пишут то иное... Концентрация создает богатство, диверсификация его сохраняет Ну вот посмотреть на всех, начиная от Баффета, заканчивая секвоей, все сделали несколько правильных сделок в жизни для получения дохуялиона денег, то есть сама суть как стать богатым это н

💯12😈5

11 May 2026, 10:05 UTC≈1,500 views9 reactionsread 6 August 2026

так маленький апдейтик: пока что сатурн достаточно хорошо выглядит, аппнули 120м твла за месяц, про $STRC и бету на него в крипте говорят все, пендл там просто х2 дал потому-что дефай снова вернулся на него и этот возвращенный дефай именно благодаря $STRC подобным продуктам (сатурн/арух) еще у меня есть список из 80 дефай кошельков самых жестких ебырей и я уже вижу по кошелькам что уже многие депают в сатурн конкр

8👍1

28 Apr 2026, 10:03 UTC≈1,390 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo

https://t.me/saturnciss через нашу прекрасную группу можно писать вопросы команде и получать на них быстро ответы

24 Apr 2026, 17:10 UTC≈1,640 views5 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

седня добавили лидерборд и рефакторнули УИ, я в топ 10 сижу кайфую. в южуале топ 50 был. это о чем то говорит. вот моя рефка она дает вам x1.05 к поинтам = SAT-E4C04F2E ввести ее можно на этой странице : https://app.saturn.credit/portfolio еще я создаю группу по сатурну в телеграме чтобы вы могли спрашивать вопросы и мы все друг друга буллишили и общались и были такие добренькие миленькие вот заходите: https://t.m

🐳32

23 Apr 2026, 14:49 UTC≈1,300 views0 reactionsread 6 August 2026

часть 3: я вижу всего пару нормальных способов фармить 1. максимально фармим поинты через usdat(рисков никаких только смарт-контракт курва+ сатурна) дают 20х поинтов депать сюды 2. средне фармить поинты+йилду через susdat(сейм риски как выше+риск стоимости strc(читайте статью чтобы его понимать) дают 12х поинтов депать сюды проект на ранней стадии, точнее в паблике он дней всего 10-15, поэтому пока интеграций н

23 Apr 2026, 14:43 UTC≈1,060 views7 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

часть 2: команда сатурна = мне оч нравится, умные ребята со связями в крипте, получили инвест от бинанса+ от прикольных ангелов(серафим и фаундер усдаи) архитектурно = сатурн мне нравится сильно больше чем apyx потому-что у них хотя-бы есть ебаный стейбл аудиты = норм ui/ux тоже приятнее, и уже собрали около 90м твла, большинство от приватных партнеров и смарт-мани по большей части смысл проекта в том что ты стейк

7

23 Apr 2026, 14:37 UTC≈1,080 views7 reactionsread 6 August 2026

ЧАСТЬ 1: всем привет ребят, я достаточно редко пишу в этот канал, не писал я давно попросту по причине того что ничего особо интересного не происходило лично для меня - в крипте, + я был занят бесконечным количеством разного вайбкодинга и в целом дефай был мертвый и фармить было особо нечего но теперь появилось что-то достаточно интересное на моем радаре, о боже я так давно не писал посты что я аж отвык короче не

7

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @alteregofoundation. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

29 May 2026, 07:27 UTCAnonymous Poll266 voters

Sentiment check

  1. Bullish44%
  2. Bearish59%

The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 20 December 2025 to 21 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 242,275 of 1,550,220entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“alter ego” (@alteregofoundation), 991 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/alteregofoundation.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.