Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ALTADEFINIZIONE STREAMING | L'ORIGINALE.

Channel

ALTADEFINIZIONE STREAMING | L'ORIGINALE.

@altadefinizionecommunity

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry

30,856subscribers

+4,983 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003881751101
TypeChannel
Username@altadefinizionecommunity
DescriptionCanale ufficiale AltaDefinizione Streaming. Nuove uscite, aggiornamenti del catalogo e comunicazioni importanti. Community e supporto: @altadefchat
Created24 April 2026 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held32
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/altadefinizionecommunity

Topic

Film & TV — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

25,87330,85628,364.57 August 2026 — 25,873 subscribers8 August 2026 — 25,947 subscribers9 August 2026 — 26,113 subscribers10 August 2026 — 26,229 subscribers11 August 2026 — 26,440 subscribers12 August 2026 — 26,532 subscribers13 August 2026 — 26,722 subscribers14 August 2026 — 26,902 subscribers16 August 2026 — 27,343 subscribers17 August 2026 — 27,917 subscribers18 August 2026 — 28,393 subscribers19 August 2026 — 28,601 subscribers20 August 2026 — 28,746 subscribers21 August 2026 — 29,021 subscribers23 August 2026 — 29,196 subscribers24 August 2026 — 29,535 subscribers25 August 2026 — 29,660 subscribers26 August 2026 — 29,813 subscribers27 August 2026 — 29,903 subscribers28 August 2026 — 30,005 subscribers29 August 2026 — 30,146 subscribers30 August 2026 — 30,231 subscribers1 September 2026 — 30,311 subscribers2 September 2026 — 30,355 subscribers3 September 2026 — 30,435 subscribers5 September 2026 — 30,555 subscribers8 September 2026 — 30,685 subscribers11 September 2026 — 30,781 subscribers13 September 2026 — 30,815 subscribers14 September 2026 — 30,848 subscribers16 September 2026 — 30,840 subscribers18 September 2026 — 30,856 subscribers7 August 202618 September 2026
32 measurements spanning 42 days, net +4,983. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 25,126–31,603 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 32
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 16:1630,856+16
16 Sept 2026, 08:0130,840-8
14 Sept 2026, 17:0130,848+33
13 Sept 2026, 02:0130,815+34
11 Sept 2026, 05:3830,781+96
8 Sept 2026, 09:5530,685+130
5 Sept 2026, 02:0030,555+120
3 Sept 2026, 09:5730,435+80
2 Sept 2026, 01:1730,355+44
1 Sept 2026, 00:3730,311+80
30 Aug 2026, 21:5330,231+85
29 Aug 2026, 21:1430,146+141
28 Aug 2026, 18:2430,005+102
27 Aug 2026, 19:4929,903+90
26 Aug 2026, 21:5429,813+153
25 Aug 2026, 20:0229,660+125
24 Aug 2026, 21:4729,535+339
23 Aug 2026, 06:3329,196+175
21 Aug 2026, 21:3629,021+275
20 Aug 2026, 19:0828,746first reading

Engagement

54 posts held, back to 24 April 2026 — the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 83 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
17.7%
avg views ÷ 30,856 subscribers
Avg views / post
5,450
27 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.272%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
27
of 54 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 30 September 2026
Posts held54 (24 April 2026 – 30 September 2026)
Views total147,191
Reactions total400
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken30 Sept 2026, 02:20 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
5
Links
1

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 30 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

996 reactions across 53 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 49.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤48949.1%
👍39039.2%
🔥484.82%
👎131.31%
😍111.10%
🤮101.00%
🥰101.00%
😁80.803%
⚡50.502%
👏40.402%
🌭20.201%
🏆20.201%
🍌10.1%
🎄10.1%
💩10.1%
🤣10.1%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 53 of the 54 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 996 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 54 most recent posts we hold, published 24 April 2026 to 30 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

30 Sept 2026, 01:33 UTC71 views1 reactionsread 30 September 2026
Photo

FROM, la serie che non fa dormire, è in catalogo. Voi ci entrereste in quella città?

👍1

28 Sept 2026, 20:41 UTC≈2,920 views15 reactionsread 30 September 2026

🎬 Altadefinizione ha un nuovo indirizzo. Da ora si entra da qui: altastreaming.duckdns.org Salvalo nei preferiti. Il tuo accesso resta valido: stesso account, stesse liste, stessi preferiti. 🔥 Tocca il bottone qui sotto e torna dentro.

👍8❤7

28 Sept 2026, 19:10 UTC≈3,180 views30 reactionsread 30 September 2026

sappiamo ci sono problemi sul dominio altadefinizionestreaming.net stiamo risolvendo

❤20⚡5👍5

28 Sept 2026, 17:04 UTC≈3,430 views4 reactionsread 30 September 2026
Photo

Il dramma è il genere più visto della settimana, e non è un caso. In cima c'è MobLand, ma oggi il bottone porta al terzo posto: Reacher, innocente con le spalle al muro. 1. MobLand (2025) 2. I Soprano (1999) 3. Reacher (2022) 4. The Mentalist (2008) 5. Silo (2023) Premi Apri qui sotto e ti mando il numero 3 in privato. Reacher o MobLand: chi la spunterebbe?

❤2👍2

27 Sept 2026, 17:04 UTC≈4,110 views16 reactionsread 30 September 2026

Domani decidete voi. E si sta facendo la guerra. Insidious guida con 52 voti, ma He-Man non molla. 1. Insidious - Fuori dall’Altrove (2026) 2. Master of the Universe (2026) 3. Scarface (2001) 4. No Escape (A Backrooms Film) (2024) Tu che voto dai? Numeri nei commenti, decidi il prossimo titolo.

👍16

26 Sept 2026, 17:04 UTC≈4,910 views17 reactionsread 30 September 2026
Photo

Una notte. Un corriere. E il caos che esplode tutto insieme. È il titolo che state divorando tutti in questi giorni. Sopravviveresti a una notte così o ti arrenderesti subito?

😍9👍5❤3

25 Sept 2026, 17:04 UTC≈5,610 views10 reactionsread 30 September 2026
Photo

Lo stanno guardando tutti in questi giorni. Tutti. 58 visioni in una settimana e la watchlist continua a salire. Baci finti che diventano veri: ci caschi sempre anche tu?

👍7❤3

24 Sept 2026, 17:04 UTC≈6,280 views20 reactionsread 30 September 2026

Il sondaggio è rovente: Insidious vola, ma la Backrooms non molla. 117 voti in totale e i due in cima sono separati da un baratro... o no? 1. Insidious - Fuori dall’Altrove (2026) 2. Master of the Universe (2026) 3. Scarface (2001) 4. No Escape (A Backrooms Film) (2024) Tu su chi punti: Incubo o He-Man?

❤17👍3

23 Sept 2026, 17:04 UTC≈7,260 views9 reactionsread 30 September 2026
Photo

Lo stanno guardando tutti in questi giorni, e non a caso. Dai geni di Deadpool e Cobra Kai: pura benzina e risate. Preferisci l'azione scema o la commedia cattiva?

👍7❤2

22 Sept 2026, 17:04 UTC≈7,520 views24 reactionsread 29 September 2026
Photo

Me l'avete chiesto in troppi. Ora è qui. 39 ricerche sul sito in pochi giorni: la community ha vinto. Ce la fa questo Superman a farvi dimenticare i precedenti?

👍14❤4🥰3🤮2🔥1

21 Sept 2026, 17:04 UTC≈7,080 views17 reactionsread 28 September 2026
Photo

L'avete chiesta in tanti. Ora è qui. 130 ricerche sul sito e 12 richieste: messaggio ricevuto. Sopravvivereste a un mondo del genere o sareste il primo a girare l'angolo sbagliato?

👍13❤3🤮1

20 Sept 2026, 17:04 UTC≈6,910 views11 reactionsread 27 September 2026
Photo

Ok, vi abbiamo sentiti. I Soprano è arrivato. 🎉 Il boss più temuto di New Jersey, in terapia dallo psicologo. Genio puro. Team Tony o team Carmela?

👍9❤2

Showing the 12 most recent of 54 posts we hold for @altadefinizionecommunity. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ALTADEFINIZIONE STREAMING | L'ORIGINALE.” (@altadefinizionecommunity), 30,856 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/altadefinizionecommunity.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.