4 measurements spanning 7 days, net +12. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,734–1,750 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
13 Aug 2026, 08:46
1,748
+2
10 Aug 2026, 06:32
1,746
+8
7 Aug 2026, 05:57
1,738
+2
6 Aug 2026, 16:34
1,736
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 27 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
89.4%
avg views ÷ 1,748 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,560
5 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.742%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
5
of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held
20 (27 May 2026 – 6 August 2026)
Views total
7,814
Reactions total
58
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
7 Aug 2026, 17:39 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
2m 49s
Average length
56s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
250 reactions across 20 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
117
46.8%
❤
72
28.8%
🔥
61
24.4%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 250reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 27 May 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
3
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 20 we hold a reading for · 10%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @alt3capital_ru. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 27 May 2026 to 6 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Биткоин — это не деньги. А что тогда деньги?
Белый дом объявил о создании стратегического биткоин-резерва, криптоактивам открыли путь в пенсионные планы 401(k), а представители индустрии добиваются налоговых послаблений для расчётов в биткоине.
Актив, который изначально задумывался как альтернатива государственным деньгам, всё глубже интегрируется в систему резервов, пенсионных накоплений и регулирования.
➡️В ново…
Основатель ALT3 Capital Динар Фасхутдинов ответил на вопросы редакции РБК Инвестиции о новом законе о цифровых валютах
В видеоматериале разобрали, как будет устроен регулируемый рынок: через каких посредников инвесторы смогут покупать и продавать цифровые активы, какие организации получат право проводить такие операции и как этот процесс будет контролировать Банк России.
Отдельно разобрали, какие условия будут дейс…
Управляющий директор ALT3 Capital Владислав Александров стал гостем утренней программы «Рынки» на РБК ТВ
В студии обсудили регулирование криптовалют в России, будущую инфраструктуру рынка, декларирование цифровых активов и перспективы Биткоина до конца года.
Полная версия эфира
YouTube
VK Видео
Dzen
31 июля управляющий директор ALT3 Capital Владислав Александров выступит на онлайн-конференции FinComm, организованной совместно с Cifra Markets
Тема выступления: «Цифровые активы для состоятельного частного инвестора — как сохранить капитал?»
Начало выступления в 16:45 мск.
Участие бесплатное.
➡️Подробности и регистрация на конференцию
Присоединяйтесь, будем рады встрече и вашим вопросам.
🎙Прямой эфир ALT3 Capital
Завтра 23 июля в 19:00 по Москве состоится прямой эфир о том, что сейчас происходит на рынках и какие факторы могут определять динамику активов во второй половине года.
Поговорим о макроэкономике и посмотрим, как меняется поведение участников рынка. Отдельно разберём криптовалютный рынок: биткоин, ончейн-метрики и новые регуляторные изменения в России.
К эфиру присоединится Сергей Джуринс…
На прошлой неделе Ondo Finance выпустила на блокчейне токенизированные версии биржевого фонда iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) и акций Micron (MU).
Сами бумаги продолжают храниться у традиционного кастодиана в рамках американской системы учета ценных бумаг. В блокчейн переносится не сама акция, а запись о праве собственности на нее.
Как устроена эта конструкция, чем она отличается от других моделей и какие риски сохр…
Почему энергетический кризис выходит далеко за пределы рынка нефти и газа?
Глобальная энергетическая торговля становится более фрагментированной. Привычные маршруты поставок усложняются, страхование и фрахт дорожают, требуется больше оборотного капитала, больше ликвидности для финансирования сделок.
В результате энергетический кризис превращается в макроэкономический фактор: он влияет на инфляцию, стоимость капитал…
ВТБ планирует добавить криптовалюты в продуктовую линейку после появления регулирования
На днях два крупнейших игрока на финансовом рынке – Т-банк и ВТБ – разразились планами создать собственные цифровые депозитарии и разрешить своим клиентам покупать криптовалюты на брокерский счет. Это все – в рамках готовящегося законодательства. Банки считают, что такие сделки станут возможными уже в этом году.
На этой неделе я…
На канале ALT3 Capital вышел новый подкаст с Владиславом Кочетковым, президентом компании «Финам»
Обсудили конкуренцию на финансовом рынке, зачем инвестору сложные продукты, как ИИ меняет индустрию и сколько криптоактивов держит в портфеле человек, который много лет управляет одной из крупнейших финансовых групп.
Смотреть полный выпуск на YouTube
Смотреть в VK Видео
Будем рады вашей обратной связи: лайкам, коммент…
Дискуссия вокруг законопроекта CLARITY Act постепенно смещается от регулирования криптовалют к фундаментальному вопросу контроля создания денег в цифровой финансовой системе
Технический вопрос о возможности начисления доходности на стейблкоины в реальности уходит в плоскость защиты депозитной базы банков.
Банковский депозит является частью механизма кредитной эмиссии. Когда банк выдает кредит, он одновременно созда…
Друзья, всем привет!
Вчера состоялось первое выступление Кевина Уорша, нового председателя ФРС.
Вместе с Сашей Кубышкиным обсудили предстоящие изменения в политике ФРС и последствия для рынков.
Следующим постом прикрепляю статью Золтана Пожара, в диалоге мы именно к ней делали отсылку.
А по ссылке наш недавний эфир, в нем мы более подробно прошлись по каждому из рынков. Ну и по традиции бонусом несмешной анекдот!
Что будет со ставкой ФРС и что это значит для рынков
Владислав Александров и Александр Кубышкин записали новый подкаст по следам решения ФРС и первого выступления Кевина Уорша в новой роли.
👍3
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @alt3capital_ru. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 38,678 of 1,480,944entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ALT3 Capital RU” (@alt3capital_ru), 1,748 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/alt3capital_ru.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.