Channel
@alphractal
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
4,623subscribers
-187 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001509983079 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @alphractal |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 18 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/alphractal |
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 13 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Oct 2026, 06:00 | 4,623 | -9 |
| 5 Oct 2026, 01:19 | 4,632 | -28 |
| 25 Sept 2026, 16:19 | 4,660 | -1 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 23:41 | 4,661 | -10 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 00:38 | 4,671 | -24 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 06:02 | 4,695 | -25 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 07:57 | 4,720 | -12 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 06:37 | 4,732 | -10 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 13:53 | 4,742 | -5 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 20:35 | 4,747 | -8 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 01:43 | 4,755 | -16 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 05:56 | 4,771 | -17 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 22:27 | 4,788 | -4 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 17:57 | 4,792 | -5 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 02:38 | 4,797 | -11 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 08:08 | 4,808 | -2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:02 | 4,810 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:49 | 4,810 | first reading |
16 posts held, back to 14 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 7 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
77 reactions across 16 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 39 | 50.6% | |
| 👍 | 34 | 44.2% | |
| 🔥 | 3 | 3.90% | |
| 🤯 | 1 | 1.30% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 77 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 14 July 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Bitcoin’s supply is getting older again. The HODL Waves are showing an important shift in market structure. Since the 2025 peak, the percentage of BTC held by younger cohorts has been declining, while older supply bands are gradually expanding. This means fewer coins are changing hands and more BTC is migrating into longer holding periods. Historically, this transition has often appeared during the later stages o…
❤2
Monero (XMR) has been rising over the past few days, and one of the main reasons was the large buildup of unliquidated short positions. More recently, major short liquidation pools were hit, signaling that many traders were caught on the wrong side of the market while betting against XMR. app.alphractal.com
❤2👍1
Solana’s Open Interest is showing an important divergence. SOL Open Interest currently stands at approximately $4.04B, with an annual change of -$3.66B. This means USD denominated Open Interest has fallen by roughly 47.5% over the past year. But when we measure it in SOL, the picture changes completely. Open Interest is now around 52.87M SOL, with a positive annual change of +9.38M SOL, representing growth of appr…
👍4❤1
It has now been 303 days since Bitcoin’s all-time high, and BTC continues to move through one of the longest drawdown periods of this cycle. Bitcoin is currently about 48.4% below its ATH, while the deepest drawdown of this cycle reached 53.1% on Day 267. Compared with previous major bear markets: 2017/18: 363 days, 83.4% drawdown 2021/22: 376 days, 75.7% drawdown 2013/15: 406 days, 85.3% drawdown In terms of tim…
❤3
Is Bitcoin approaching a new accumulation zone? The LTH/STH SOPR Ratio compares the behavior of long term holders with that of short term holders. SOPR shows whether coins moved on the network are being sold at a profit or at a loss. When this ratio falls, it means the profitability advantage of long term holders is shrinking relative to short term market participants. Historically, the lowest levels of this metri…
❤5👍4
Google searches for cryptocurrencies are starting to rise again. After a long period of declining public interest, the data is beginning to show renewed attention toward Bitcoin, Ethereum, Solana, and other major names in the market. We are still well below the levels of euphoria seen during previous major peaks, which makes this move even more interesting. Retail attention may be starting to return ahead of a bro…
❤3
Bitcoin’s Adoption Score has remained at 1 for the past 15 days. This means Bitcoin’s network adoption is currently at a low level relative to its historical trend, reflecting weaker network activity and connectivity compared to more active periods. Moments like this are often observed near cycle bottoms, when investor participation is limited and bearish narratives tend to dominate market sentiment. The metric is…
👍3❤2
The Stocks Fear & Greed Index has fallen to 34, returning to the Fear zone. Risk appetite is weakening while uncertainty is rising across the stock market. Price remains elevated, but sentiment is becoming increasingly fragile app.alphractal.com
❤3
Bitcoin is approaching a historically important on-chain zone. The LTH/STH Realized Cap Ratio compares the Realized Cap held by Long-Term Holders with the capital held by Short-Term Holders. Historically, when this ratio moved above 4, Bitcoin was forming a major cycle bottom. The ratio has now reached 3.9, placing the market very close to that threshold once again. A rising ratio indicates that a larger share of…
👍2
The 180 day Long Term Holder Net Position Change has just reached approximately +2.65 million BTC, one of the highest accumulation levels in the metric’s entire history. However, this data must be interpreted carefully. It does not necessarily mean that Long Term Holders recently purchased 2.65 million BTC. Part of this increase occurs when previously dormant coins reach the required age to be classified as long te…
👍2❤1
Bitcoin Open Interest across the top 30 exchanges is rising during the bear market. What is happening now looks very similar to the 2021 to 2022 bear market, especially when Open Interest is measured in BTC rather than USD. It is not only Bitcoin’s price that appears to move in cycles. Leverage, trader positioning and derivatives data also seem to repeat the same behavioral patterns across different market cycles.…
👍6❤1
ADA (Cardano) has disappointed many investors. In 2021, Cardano experienced its peak, with massive on-chain transaction activity driven by a huge wave of new adopters. Since then, however, the number of transactions has continued to decline. At the same time, we have also seen a significant drop in social media posts and crypto influencers discussing ADA. Data like this shows just how dynamic the crypto market is …
👍4❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @alphractal. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Alphractal - Crypto Research” (@alphractal), 4,623 subscribers as measured 11 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/alphractal.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.