Channel
@alphractal
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
4,797subscribers
-13 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001509983079 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @alphractal |
| Description | Advanced platform for investment data analysis. Access powerful analyses, insights, and strategies for financial markets 🔗 alphractal.com |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 31 January 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/alphractal |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 02:38 | 4,797 | -11 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 08:08 | 4,808 | -2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:02 | 4,810 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:49 | 4,810 | first reading |
16 posts held, back to 14 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 7 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 16 (14 July 2026 – 11 August 2026) |
| Views total | 6,789 |
| Reactions total | 77 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 05:19 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
77 reactions across 16 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 39 | 50.6% | |
| 👍 | 34 | 44.2% | |
| 🔥 | 3 | 3.90% | |
| 🤯 | 1 | 1.30% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 77reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 14 July 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Bitcoin’s supply is getting older again. The HODL Waves are showing an important shift in market structure. Since the 2025 peak, the percentage of BTC held by younger cohorts has been declining, while older supply bands are gradually expanding. This means fewer coins are changing hands and more BTC is migrating into longer holding periods. Historically, this transition has often appeared during the later stages o…
❤2
Monero (XMR) has been rising over the past few days, and one of the main reasons was the large buildup of unliquidated short positions. More recently, major short liquidation pools were hit, signaling that many traders were caught on the wrong side of the market while betting against XMR. app.alphractal.com
❤2👍1
Solana’s Open Interest is showing an important divergence. SOL Open Interest currently stands at approximately $4.04B, with an annual change of -$3.66B. This means USD denominated Open Interest has fallen by roughly 47.5% over the past year. But when we measure it in SOL, the picture changes completely. Open Interest is now around 52.87M SOL, with a positive annual change of +9.38M SOL, representing growth of appr…
👍4❤1
It has now been 303 days since Bitcoin’s all-time high, and BTC continues to move through one of the longest drawdown periods of this cycle. Bitcoin is currently about 48.4% below its ATH, while the deepest drawdown of this cycle reached 53.1% on Day 267. Compared with previous major bear markets: 2017/18: 363 days, 83.4% drawdown 2021/22: 376 days, 75.7% drawdown 2013/15: 406 days, 85.3% drawdown In terms of tim…
❤3
Is Bitcoin approaching a new accumulation zone? The LTH/STH SOPR Ratio compares the behavior of long term holders with that of short term holders. SOPR shows whether coins moved on the network are being sold at a profit or at a loss. When this ratio falls, it means the profitability advantage of long term holders is shrinking relative to short term market participants. Historically, the lowest levels of this metri…
❤5👍4
Google searches for cryptocurrencies are starting to rise again. After a long period of declining public interest, the data is beginning to show renewed attention toward Bitcoin, Ethereum, Solana, and other major names in the market. We are still well below the levels of euphoria seen during previous major peaks, which makes this move even more interesting. Retail attention may be starting to return ahead of a bro…
❤3
Bitcoin’s Adoption Score has remained at 1 for the past 15 days. This means Bitcoin’s network adoption is currently at a low level relative to its historical trend, reflecting weaker network activity and connectivity compared to more active periods. Moments like this are often observed near cycle bottoms, when investor participation is limited and bearish narratives tend to dominate market sentiment. The metric is…
👍3❤2
The Stocks Fear & Greed Index has fallen to 34, returning to the Fear zone. Risk appetite is weakening while uncertainty is rising across the stock market. Price remains elevated, but sentiment is becoming increasingly fragile app.alphractal.com
❤3
Bitcoin is approaching a historically important on-chain zone. The LTH/STH Realized Cap Ratio compares the Realized Cap held by Long-Term Holders with the capital held by Short-Term Holders. Historically, when this ratio moved above 4, Bitcoin was forming a major cycle bottom. The ratio has now reached 3.9, placing the market very close to that threshold once again. A rising ratio indicates that a larger share of…
👍2
The 180 day Long Term Holder Net Position Change has just reached approximately +2.65 million BTC, one of the highest accumulation levels in the metric’s entire history. However, this data must be interpreted carefully. It does not necessarily mean that Long Term Holders recently purchased 2.65 million BTC. Part of this increase occurs when previously dormant coins reach the required age to be classified as long te…
👍2❤1
Bitcoin Open Interest across the top 30 exchanges is rising during the bear market. What is happening now looks very similar to the 2021 to 2022 bear market, especially when Open Interest is measured in BTC rather than USD. It is not only Bitcoin’s price that appears to move in cycles. Leverage, trader positioning and derivatives data also seem to repeat the same behavioral patterns across different market cycles.…
👍6❤1
ADA (Cardano) has disappointed many investors. In 2021, Cardano experienced its peak, with massive on-chain transaction activity driven by a huge wave of new adopters. Since then, however, the number of transactions has continued to decline. At the same time, we have also seen a significant drop in social media posts and crypto influencers discussing ADA. Data like this shows just how dynamic the crypto market is …
👍4❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @alphractal. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 485,017 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Alphractal - Crypto Research” (@alphractal), 4,797 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/alphractal.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.