Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ELITE MODELING ACADEMY πŸšΆβ€β™‚οΈπŸ’ƒ

Supergroup

ELITE MODELING ACADEMY πŸšΆβ€β™‚οΈπŸ’ƒ

@alphno

On this record: Topic Β· Growth Β· Engagement Β· Citations Β· Cite this entry

1,060members

-44 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

51 online right now

Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001510085435
TypeSupergroup
Username@alphno
DescriptionELITE MODELING ACADEMY Adress,Addis abeba αŠ α‰ƒα‰‚ α‰ƒαˆŠα‰² α‰±αˆ‰ α‹²αˆα‰± አለም α‰£αŠ•αŠ­ ,,,, Alem Bank +251936038070 +251961948738 @Modelsis @Yozed5 Elite channel
First recorded8 October 2026
Last confirmed live8 October 2026
Measurements held14
On Telegramt.me/alphno

Topic

Other / unclassifiable β€” a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 October 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 53% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured β€” it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

1,0601,1071,083.57 August 2026 β€” 1,104 members10 August 2026 β€” 1,107 members14 August 2026 β€” 1,101 members17 August 2026 β€” 1,098 members20 August 2026 β€” 1,092 members24 August 2026 β€” 1,087 members27 August 2026 β€” 1,080 members31 August 2026 β€” 1,076 members2 September 2026 β€” 1,073 members7 September 2026 β€” 1,071 members15 September 2026 β€” 1,067 members28 September 2026 β€” 1,062 members5 October 2026 β€” 1,060 members8 October 2026 β€” 1,060 members7 August 20268 October 2026
14 measurements spanning 62 days, net -44. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between β€” snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean β€œno change observed”, never β€œinterpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,053–1,114 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log β€” every members count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)MembersChange
8 Oct 2026, 00:581,060no change
5 Oct 2026, 20:391,060-2
28 Sept 2026, 09:011,062-5
15 Sept 2026, 13:171,067-4
7 Sept 2026, 03:011,071-2
2 Sept 2026, 15:441,073-3
31 Aug 2026, 01:241,076-4
27 Aug 2026, 16:241,080-7
24 Aug 2026, 07:081,087-5
20 Aug 2026, 18:481,092-6
17 Aug 2026, 11:271,098-3
14 Aug 2026, 07:081,101-6
10 Aug 2026, 22:581,107+3
7 Aug 2026, 01:201,104first reading

Engagement

Posts not read yet. This entry is on the register from its profile alone; the post reader has not reached it. Engagement figures appear here once posts have actually been measured β€” we do not publish a rate before we have the readings behind it.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel β€” every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched β€” that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason β€” naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides β€” the β€œNamed by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 October 2026 β€” this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

β€œELITE MODELING ACADEMY πŸšΆβ€β™‚οΈπŸ’ƒβ€ (@alphno), 1,060 members as measured 8 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/alphno.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.