Channel
@alphapilled
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
93subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001714222017 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @alphapilled |
| Description | Frauen kann man lieben oder verstehen! Alles über Geschlechterdynamiken |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/alphapilled |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Aug 2026, 13:16 | 93 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 07:31 | 93 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 21 October 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 19 (21 October 2025 – 26 July 2026) |
| Views total | 42 |
| Reactions total | 5 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 9 Aug 2026, 13:16 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
41 reactions across 17 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 53.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 22 | 53.7% | |
| 🤣 | 8 | 19.5% | |
| 👍 | 4 | 9.76% | |
| 🤮 | 3 | 7.32% | |
| 👏 | 2 | 4.88% | |
| 💯 | 1 | 2.44% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 2.44% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 41reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 21 October 2025 to 26 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @alphapilled. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 21 October 2025 to 26 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Wir müssen nicht geheilt und perfekt sein, aber bereit sein, unsere Hüllen fallen zu lassen. Egal, ob du es willst oder nicht, sobald die Beziehung eine gewisse Tiefe erreicht, ist es unmöglich seine Schatten zu verbergen. Du wirst wahrscheinlich keinen Partner dadrausen finden, der frei von Traumata und Ängsten ist, aber jemanden der genauso wie du, bereit ist bei sich hinzuspüren. Es braucht nicht mehr als die B…
❤2👏2🤣1
Sie erinnert, er trägt. Sie fühlt, bevor Worte entstehen, er handelt, wenn Worte versiegen. Verschieden im Wesen zu Feuer und Flamme... Zwischen ihnen wächst Liebe nicht aus Gleichheit, sondern aus dem Mut, zu bleiben. ❤️❤️❤️ @JoanasLiebe
Wenn Freiheit heilt und wann sie verletzt Über Lust, Zyklen, Polygamie, Tantra und eine Sexualität, die wirklich trägt. Wir leben in einer Zeit, in der fast alles erlaubt ist aber wenig verstanden. Sexualität ist frei geworden und oft leer. Beziehungen offen, aber nicht immer ehrlich. Liebe wird gesucht, während der Körper übergangen wird. Hier beginnt das Missverständnis. Der weibliche Körper funktioniert nicht li…
❤2🤮1
Ist es möglich?
❤2💯1🤣1
Clips unter 5min https://t.me/kuerze
❤1🔥1🤣1
Männer und Frauen Zwei Pole derselben Wahrheit Es gibt einen Grund, warum Männer und Frauen sich oft nicht verstehen, und es ist derselbe Grund, warum sie sich so tief anziehen. Sie sind nicht einfach Gegensätze, sondern zwei Teile eines größeren Ganzen, das jenseits des bloßen Verstandes liegt. Männliche und weibliche Energie sind wie die beiden Seiten eines Spiegels. Der Mann blickt in ihn hinein, sucht Klarheit…
❤2👍2
Wenn eine Frau ihre sexuelle Energie verkörpert: Wie Scham schmilzt und Heilung beginnt 💗 Eine Frau, die beginnt, ihre sexuelle Energie bewusst zu spüren, betritt einen sehr alten Raum in sich. Dort, wo Lust, Lebendigkeit und Präsenz nicht voneinander getrennt sind. Diese Energie ist roh und heilig zugleich. Sie bewegt sich in Wellen. Sie wärmt, öffnet, lässt fühlen. Doch viele Frauen können sie erst dann wirklich z…
🤣2👍1
Und Sexualität wird wieder ein natürlicher Ausdruck von Leben, nicht ein Rollenspiel. Heilung entsteht dort, wo eine Frau sich erlaubt, in ihrer ganzen Energie zu atmen auch in der, die sie lange unterdrückt hat. Wenn sie erkennt, dass sie nichts abgeben muss, um angenommen zu werden. Wenn sie aufhört, sich zu entschuldigen für das, was in ihr lebendig ist. Dann geschieht Rückkehr. Nicht zu einem Ideal. Zu sich sel…
❤1
Jemand, der viel sexuelle Energie hat, kann auch eine sehr heilende Energie haben. Weil sexuelle Energie auf spiritueller Ebene Heilenergie ist. Die besten Heiler haben viel sexuelle Energie. Deine sexuelle Energie ist weder schmutzig noch gefährlich. Sie ist heilig. Lerne, sie zu halten, und du wirst anfangen zu verstehen, wie Heilung wirklich funktioniert. Die besten Heiler sind nicht immer ruhig. Was sie sind: l…
Um Bewusstheit in jene Teile zu bringen, die abgeschaltet waren. Und die meisten dieser Teile sitzen unten, im Wurzelchakra. Die Wurzel trägt sowohl Trauma als auch Vitalität. Deshalb ist sie oft so geladen, so reaktiv. Du kannst nicht sexuell erwachen, ohne dem zu begegnen, was dort vergraben liegt. Schuld, Angst, Berührungen, die wehgetan haben, oder Berührungen, die nie kamen. Aber auch Kraft. Klarheit. Der Dran…
👍1
Berührung, die unter die Haut geht – Was Frauen wirklich wollen Die meisten Männer sagen irgendwann denselben Satz. Nicht wortgleich, aber sinngleich: “Ich will es richtig machen. Ich will ihr zeigen, dass ich sie will. Ich will, dass sie sich begehrt fühlt.” Und ich glaube ihnen. Was sie oft nicht verstehen, ist, dass diese Haltung, obwohl gut gemeint, nicht reicht. Manchmal wirkt sie sogar abschreckend. Denn was …
❤2
Echte Intimität beginnt dort, wo der Mann bereit ist, nicht zu wissen, was kommt. Wo er seine Erwartungen loslässt. Wo er nicht in Kategorien von “gelungen” oder “versagt” denkt, sondern einfach da bleibt. Ohne Agenda. Techniken ohne Einfühlung sind hohl Du kannst zehn Tantra-Workshops besucht haben und trotzdem eine Frau emotional verlieren, weil du ihre Körpersignale nicht erkennst. Weil du nicht merkst, dass sie…
❤2
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @alphapilled. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Red Pill Mentalität” (@alphapilled), 93 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/alphapilled.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.