Channel
@alphaorycix
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
208subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001580889391 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @alphaorycix |
| Description | A user-friendly crypto community, introducing blockchain technology, via fundamental research, for the current and coming generation. We are no financial advisors, we strictly supply the population with educational content. Risk Management is 🔑 |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 13 June 2022— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/alphaorycix |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Aug 2026, 03:47 | 208 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 01:24 | 208 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 13 June 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 October 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
39 reactions across 6 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 71.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 28 | 71.8% | |
| 👍 | 7 | 17.9% | |
| 🔥 | 3 | 7.69% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 2.56% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 39reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 13 June 2022 to 3 October 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
The owner of this channel has been inactive for the last 2 months. If they remain inactive for the next 8 days, they may lose their account and admin rights in this channel. The contents of the channel will remain accessible for all users.
The owner of this channel has been inactive for the last 2 months. If they remain inactive for the next 29 days, they may lose their account and admin rights in this channel. The contents of the channel will remain accessible for all users.
The owner of this channel has been inactive for the last 11 months. If they remain inactive for the next 20 days, they may lose their account and admin rights in this channel. The contents of the channel will remain accessible for all users.
To whom is still subscribed to my channel... I lost the love for crypto, and all of my active interests at the time. I saw people change like the weather upon the bear market start. For those that are still a member to support, I kindly ask you go send me a message, to help bring back the motivation to continue the journey for which I've always had a sincere passion for. Thank you to those of you who have stuck a…
❤21👍3
Bitcoin has officially penetrated my expected target of 17.5k... This is not the end, as I've mentioned in previous analysis... 13k is also not the bottom, just saying🫡
$BTC reached the initial supply zone we were targeting... (bravo to those who entered any positions) Now ideally I am targeting the low of 17.5k... Should I see any bullish movement, that invalidates my next potential move, I will keep you all posted.
🔥1
Eid Mubarak my people! To those celebrating Eid today, gave an awesome day! And may you all be blessed for today and days to come! Eid Mubarak ❤️
❤2
$BTC after failing to reach the supply zone I was targeting, I believe now, we are either waiting for confirmation to bounce off of 18,250 level, or we are taking out the low of 17567, holiday weekend in America, could result in a dump, we'll have to see... Should be interesting, don't think that we see it holding, but we are still waiting for confirmation to see how it should go. The only fundamental tool that is …
https://www.reuters.com/markets/us/crypto-hedge-fund-three-arrows-files-chapter-15-bankruptcy-2022-07-01/?taid=62bf90653e1ad60001a9c8d4
https://twitter.com/unizen_io/status/1541470827555672064?t=EcQAlY1V1LB8BqijfevULA&s=19
$BTC update... Bitcoin has not yet reached 18k when I mentioned it previously (although my judgement stays the same) I want to ideally see liquidity being grabbed from this rising wedge, into supply zone.
(invalidated) $AVAX speculation...
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @alphaorycix. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 764,129 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@alphaorycix named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“AlphaOrycix” (@alphaorycix), 208 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/alphaorycix.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.