Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Alpha Owls 🦉

Channel

Alpha Owls 🦉

@alpha_owls

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

2,981subscribers

+228 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002180636422
TypeChannel
Username@alpha_owls
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/alpha_owls

Growth

2,7502,9812,865.56 August 2026 — 2,753 subscribers6 August 2026 — 2,750 subscribers10 August 2026 — 2,788 subscribers12 August 2026 — 2,907 subscribers16 August 2026 — 2,981 subscribers6 August 202616 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 10 days, net +228. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,715–3,016 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Aug 2026, 18:372,981+74
12 Aug 2026, 23:342,907+119
10 Aug 2026, 00:032,788+38
6 Aug 2026, 18:402,750-3
6 Aug 2026, 09:212,753first reading

Engagement

22 posts held, back to 18 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
42.2%
avg views ÷ 2,981 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,260
21 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.88%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
21
of 22 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held22 (18 July 20267 August 2026)
Views total26,391
Reactions total495
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 16:11 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

515 reactions across 22 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
19337.5%
🔥15830.7%
👍15730.5%
20.388%
🤔20.388%
👀10.194%
😎10.194%
🤯10.194%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 22 of the 22 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 515reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 18 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
15
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 22 we hold a reading for · 9%
Most on one post
10
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @alpha_owls. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 22 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 18 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 14:42 UTC427 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

UNVAULT - 4 WL spots for phase 2 The Omnichain NFT marketplace & launch platform. Across 8 blockchains. FREEMINT. Supply: 5000 https://x.com/OwlLfg/status/2085736855014646078

🔥65👍2

7 Aug 2026, 00:58 UTC≈1,090 views16 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Fresh Watchlist https://x.com/OwlLfg/status/2085514583339356345 2 giveaways on X: 1 and 2 Nothing interesting at the moment

👍11🔥32

6 Aug 2026, 20:23 UTC≈1,090 views18 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

https://opensea.io/collection/momoyumemi https://x.com/momoyumemi After the token announcement, it pumped hard, peaking at over $120+ I raffled off 15 spots I'll post more early projects later

👍114🔥3

5 Aug 2026, 00:34 UTC≈1,130 views22 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

P.K.O - from DD. Founder Pepegas Sherwood - freemint on robinhood pyokomoko - pixel Pyoko rabbit on robinhood More early projects - https://x.com/OwlLfg/status/2084797723702636832 There are also 5 active giveaways in X right now. Deadline: 12 hours.

12👍6🔥4

4 Aug 2026, 17:45 UTC≈1,210 views30 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

https://x.com/momoyumemi https://opensea.io/collection/momoyumemi/overview Пока выходит х2 5 гивов в твиттере: первый, второй, третий, четвертый и пятый Оказывается, за июль я провёл более 51 гива

🔥224👍4

3 Aug 2026, 22:32 UTC≈1,360 views20 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

https://opensea.io/collection/catbathatfatrat-?activityTypes=mint https://x.com/CatBatHatFatRat Паблик минт. Часа 2 минтилось 5-6 иксов. Даже на скаме можно заработать

15🔥3👍2

3 Aug 2026, 13:20 UTC≈1,250 views20 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

https://opensea.io/collection/a-nonym-106912096 https://x.com/anonym_hood как раз вчера упоминал о них в своей сводке х3-х4 на любой сайз Фулл паблик минт. Было около 8 минут на минт upd. 6x

14👍3🔥3

2 Aug 2026, 22:28 UTC≈1,410 views36 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Fresh Alpha RengersNFT - нфт на робингуде. Форма на вл Много интересного: https://x.com/OwlLfg/status/2084041345531003036 6 гивов в твиттере: первый, второй, третий, четвертый, пятый и шестой

👍20🔥106

2 Aug 2026, 09:47 UTC754 views25 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

https://opensea.io/collection/h00dle/activity И такое бывает у нас. Просто дропнуть кош в чате https://x.com/h00dle_ https://momoyumemi.com/checker - чекер Momo. Гтд может минтить фкфс. 4 августа минт. Раздавал 15 спотов

👍13🔥93

31 Jul 2026, 15:59 UTC≈1,390 views28 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Fresh Watchlist DIVERGENTS - 10к нфт на эфире от этого парня Hood Bits - арты на робингуде. Форма на вл PU-X - билдит этот парень OZZ - тут форма на вл Макаки - freemint -> $20-25 с одного коша на гтд стадии. Писал эрли и кидал обновы Больше проектов: https://x.com/OwlLfg/status/2083218909583307194 3 гива в твиттере: первый, второй и третий

🔥21👍43

29 Jul 2026, 13:29 UTC≈1,430 views20 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

OZZ - фришка на робингуде. Форма на вл Минтим макак через 4 часа Ничего особо интересного нет, выделять нечего. 3 гива: первый, второй и третий https://x.com/OwlLfg/status/2082449749865570385

👍134🔥3

27 Jul 2026, 16:19 UTC≈1,550 views22 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Momo - минт 4 августа Supply: 4,444 NFTs. GTD: 0.0075. FCFS: 0.008. Public: 0.0085 MonkeyHood - 29 числа минт. Все стадии фриминт Unusual society - скоро минт. 3333 саплай. 0.0033 eth вл. 0.0044 eth паблик. Чекер Hood AI - отминтились. С вл стадии ~ 0.007 eth выходило. Подозрительные, но фришка, есть фришка https://x.com/owllfg/status/2081792887201595690?s=46

15🔥4👍3

Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @alpha_owls. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 222,952 of 1,550,164entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Alpha Owls 🦉” (@alpha_owls), 2,981 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/alpha_owls.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.