Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

العروة الوثقى الزيدية

@alorwahalwuthqa

On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

6,086subscribers

-4 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001923027065
TypeChannel
Username@alorwahalwuthqa
Descriptionقناة العروة الوثقى الزيدية لنشر فكر وتراث أئمة أهل البيت الزيدية موقع العروة الوثقى الزيدية https://alorwahalwuthqa.com واتساب:https://whatsapp.com/channel/0029Va93xv11NCrcLbXtSz2K فيسبوك facebook.com/alorwahalwuthqa يوتيوب https://youtube.com/@alorwahal
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/alorwahalwuthqa

Topic

Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@alorwahalwuthqa/7225 · this entry3 Aug 2026, 14:20 UTC@azzaidiah/196923 Aug 2026, 14:20 UTC1.00under a minute
@alorwahalwuthqa/7226 · this entry3 Aug 2026, 14:50 UTC@azzaidiah/196933 Aug 2026, 16:55 UTC1.002.1 hours
@alorwahalwuthqa/7227 · this entry3 Aug 2026, 21:01 UTC@azzaidiah/196943 Aug 2026, 21:51 UTC1.0050 minutes
@alorwahalwuthqa/7228 · this entry4 Aug 2026, 21:51 UTC@azzaidiah/196974 Aug 2026, 21:54 UTC1.004 minutes
@alorwahalwuthqa/7229 · this entry5 Aug 2026, 13:50 UTC@azzaidiah/197045 Aug 2026, 19:02 UTC1.005.2 hours
@alorwahalwuthqa/7230 · this entry5 Aug 2026, 15:17 UTC@azzaidiah/197025 Aug 2026, 15:17 UTC1.00under a minute
Every channel this entry shares post bodies with
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@azzaidiah10 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.0017 minutesthis entry (64)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 1 of the 4 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 21 comparable posts for this entry, running 31 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Across the whole group of 2, the earliest publisher we hold is @azzaidiah. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the key clone_mutual, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

6,0866,0926,0897 August 2026 — 6,090 subscribers7 August 2026 — 6,092 subscribers10 August 2026 — 6,086 subscribers7 August 202610 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 3 days, net -4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,085–6,093 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 10:116,086-6
7 Aug 2026, 16:546,092+2
7 Aug 2026, 01:326,090first reading

Engagement

42 posts held, back to 31 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 9 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
11.5%
avg views ÷ 6,086 subscribers
Avg views / post
697
42 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.66%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
42
of 42 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held42 (31 July 202611 August 2026)
Views total29,278
Reactions total486
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 03:33 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
1,620
Videos
390
Links
3,590

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
3m 54s
Average length
3m 54s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

486 reactions across 42 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 51.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍24951.2%
19840.7%
🕊357.20%
👎30.617%
💯10.206%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 42 of the 42 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 486reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 42 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

11 Aug 2026, 20:44 UTC184 views4 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

.🏷️ التقويم اليومي مع حكمة وفتوى 🗓️اليوم : الأربعاء 🌙 التاريخ: ٢٩ صفر ١٤٤٨ هـ ☀️ الموافق: 2026- 8-12 💡 شرح حكمة أمير المؤمنين: (الصدقة دواء منجح): للمرضى، وفيه غاية الشفاء، وفي الحديث: «داووا مرضاكم بالصدقة» . (أعمال العباد في عاجلهم): يعني أن كل ما فعله الإنسان من الأعمال في الدنيا العاجلة، فهو: (نصب أعينهم في الآجلة ): فكأنه شيء منصوب بين أعينهم، ينظرون إليه ولا ينظرون إلى سواه، ولا ينفعهم في الآخرة إلا هو. ➖➖➖ 📝

2👍2

11 Aug 2026, 17:43 UTC293 views5 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

( فوائد قرآنية [التوسل إلى الله بالإيمان ]) قال تعالى : {أَنْتَ مَوْلَانَا فَانْصُرْنَا عَلَى الْقَوْمِ الْكَافِرِينَ} توسلوا إلى الله تعالى في أن ينصرهم على القوم الكافرين بذكر ما عندهم من الإيمان واليقين بأن الله تعالى مالك أمرهم، وأنه أولى بهم من أنفسهم، لا أمر لهم مع أمره، وأنه ناصرهم لأنهم عباده المؤمنون. · ـــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــ 📚 زبر من الفوائد القرآنية للسيد العلامة الحجة / محمد بن عبد

👍41

11 Aug 2026, 12:25 UTC417 views10 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

📋باب الحوائج: نبع الحكمة وصرار المعروف 📜إن ممن زان التاريخ بذكره، وبهر العقول بفطنته وصبره، الإمام موسى بن جعفر بن محمد بن علي بن الحسين بن علي -عليهم السلام-؛ العبد الصالح الذي كان منقطع النظير منذ نعومة أظفاره، جامعا بين علم الأنبياء وأخلاق الأوصياء. مدرسة الفطنة والنشأة بدت علائم النبوغ عليه وهو صبي بعد، ينهل من معين القرآن؛ فقد روي أن النعمان بن ثابت (أبا حنيفة) دخل المدينة لزيارة جعفر بن محمد الصادق، فأتى ابنه م

👍81🕊1

10 Aug 2026, 21:05 UTC492 views11 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

.🏷️ التقويم اليومي مع حكمة وفتوى 🗓️اليوم : الثلاثاء 🌙 التاريخ: ٢٨ صفر ١٤٤٨ هـ ☀️ الموافق: 2026- 8-11 💡 شرح حكمة أمير المؤمنين: (العلم وراثة كريمة): يعني أنه لا ميراث أفضل من ميراث العلم، ولهذا قال صلى الله عليه وآله وسلم: «العلماء ورثة الأنبياء» ، وغرضه أنه يشرف صاحبها بوراثتها، ويعظم حاله، ويكمل أمره. (الآداب حلل مجددة): يشير إلى أنه بمنزلة الملابس كلما دخل في أدب وألزمه نفسه كان بمنزلة من يلبس خِلْعَة جديدة، وأن

👍73🕊1

10 Aug 2026, 14:38 UTC522 views11 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

📥 سؤال جديد: الإجازة ✍️ المفتي: السيد العلامة الحجة / محمد بن عبدالله عوض المؤيدي 📝 نص السؤال: نسمع أن فلاناً أجازه العالم الفلاني، فماذا تعني الإجازة؟ هل هي كالشهادة في أن المجاز له أهل للفتيا أو أن لها معنى آخر؟ 💡الجواب: أن الإجازة طريق من طرق الرواية، فلا يحق لأحد أن يروي عن العالم ويحدث عنه إلا إذا سمعه، وحينئذ يجوز أن يحدث عنه ويروي عنه ما سمعه، فإذا لم يسمعه لم يجز له أن يقول: قال فلان كذا وكذا إلا إذا أذن ل

5👍5🕊1

10 Aug 2026, 14:35 UTC447 views7 reactionsread 12 August 2026

📥 سؤال جديد: حكم التساهل في أحاديث الفضائل ✍️ المفتي: السيد العلامة الحجة / محمد بن عبدالله عوض المؤيدي 📝 نص السؤال: أشكل علينا قول صاحب الفصول: ويحرم التساهل في أحاديث الفضائل ونحوها من غير بيان ضعفها أو بطلانها .. إلخ. 💡الجواب: الذي ظهر لي فيما ذكرتم من الأحاديث أن الحديث كما ذكرتم إذا كان مما رواه محدّثونا من غير نكير، ولم يكن في الحديث معارضة لقاطع، أو كانت موافقة لظاهر آية أو حديث صحيح- فلا مانع من ذكره للترغ

👍52

10 Aug 2026, 14:29 UTC354 views7 reactionsread 12 August 2026

📥 سؤال جديد: العمل بخبر الآحاد ✍️ المفتي: السيد العلامة الحجة / محمد بن عبدالله عوض المؤيدي 📝 نص السؤال: قال علماء الأصول: إن الخبر الآحاد لا يفيد إلا الظن فلا يعمل به إلا في المسائل الفرعية، وأن نحو وجوب الصلاة ونحوها من المسائل التي يعم بها البلوى علماً وعملاً لا يقبل فيها إلا خبر يفيد العلم. ولكن الرسول صلى الله عليه وعلى آله وسلم قد أرسل إلى اليمن الإمام علي بن أبي طالب ومعاذ بن جبل ليدعوَا الناس إلى الإسلام، و

👍42🕊1

10 Aug 2026, 14:21 UTC317 views8 reactionsread 12 August 2026

📥 سؤال جديد: حكم مخالف ظواهر القرآن ✍️ المفتي: السيد العلامة الحجة / محمد بن عبدالله عوض المؤيدي 📝 نص السؤال: يقال إن دلالة الظواهر غير قطعية، وحينئذٍ فلا يحكم بفسق مخالف ظواهر القرآن والمتواتر من السنة، هذا مع العلم أن أكثر الأحكام إنما تثبت بالظواهر؛ فما هو الرأي في هذه المسألة؟ 💡الجواب: والله الموفق: أنه قد ثبت قطعاً وجوب العمل بظواهر القرآن والسنة المعلومة، فبناءً على ذلك فإنها تكون كالنصوص في أنه يحرم مخالفته

👍43🕊1

10 Aug 2026, 14:14 UTC317 views7 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

📥 سؤال جديد: [الحكمة في اختلاف أدلة الأحكام التكليفية] ✍️ المفتي: السيد العلامة الحجة / محمد بن عبدالله عوض المؤيدي 📝 نص السؤال: : ماهي الحكمة في اختلاف أدلة الأحكام التكليفية في الوضوح والخفاء، والقوة والضعف، والعلم والظن، والقرب والبعد، و ... إلخ؟ 💡الجواب: : أن الحكمة من وراء ذلك: ١ - زيادة التكليف، فإن الأجر على قدر المشقة. ٢ - الابتلاء والاختبار، «المؤمنون وقافون عند الشبهات». ٣ - بيان فضل العلماء، وتمييز درجا

👍42🕊1

10 Aug 2026, 14:13 UTC326 views7 reactionsread 12 August 2026

📥 سؤال جديد: هل تختلف التكاليف باختلاف طباع الأشخاص ✍️ المفتي: السيد العلامة الحجة / محمد بن عبدالله عوض المؤيدي 📝 نص السؤال: : هل تختلف التكاليف الشرعية من شخص لآخر بسبب اختلاف الأشخاص في الطباع أو غيرها؟ 💡الجواب: [هل تختلف التكاليف باختلاف طباع الأشخاص] سؤال: هل تختلف التكاليف الشرعية من شخص لآخر بسبب اختلاف الأشخاص في الطباع أو غيرها؟ الجواب: هناك أسباب تكون علة لاختلاف بعض الأحكام الشرعية من شخص لشخص منها: ١ -

👍42🕊1

10 Aug 2026, 14:08 UTC357 views8 reactionsread 12 August 2026

📥 سؤال جديد: متى ظهر أصول الفقه ✍️ المفتي: السيد العلامة الحجة / محمد بن عبدالله عوض المؤيدي 📝 نص السؤال: متى ظهر علم أصول الفقه سؤال: متى ظهر علم أصول الفقه؟ وكذلك علم أصول الدين؟ 💡الجواب: الجواب والله الموفق: علم أصول الفقه ظاهر منذ عهد الصحابة، وكذلك علم أصول الدين؛ فقد تحدّث أمير المؤمنين عن مبادئ أصول الفقه كما في نهج البلاغة، فذكر رواة الحديث وقسمهم إلى عدة أقسام، وذكر العام والخاص، والناسخ والمنسوخ، وقال: ل

👍43🕊1

10 Aug 2026, 13:32 UTC416 views8 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

( فوائد قرآنية [على الإنسان أن يتعلم ويكسب المعارف ) قال تعالى: {فَبَعَثَ اللَّهُ غُرَابًا يَبْحَثُ فِي الْأَرْضِ لِيُرِيَهُ كَيْفَ يُوَارِي سَوْأَةَ أَخِيهِ ...} [المائدة:٣١]، في ذلك: - أن على الإنسان أن يتعلم ويكتسب المعارف من حيث ما وجدها بغض النظر عن حقارة مصدر العلم. - وأن الإشارة تفيد ما يفيده الكلام. - وأن القياس طريق إلى معرفة الحكم الشرعي. - وأن للمؤمن حرمة وكرامة بعد موته. - وأنه لا ينبغي كشف وإفشاء ما يوج

👍71

Showing the 12 most recent of 42 posts we hold for @alorwahalwuthqa. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 479,462 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“العروة الوثقى الزيدية” (@alorwahalwuthqa), 6,086 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/alorwahalwuthqa.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.