Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Светлый Альметьевск

Channel

Светлый Альметьевск

@almet_light

On this record: Topic · Observations · Channels linked by matching posts · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Advertising · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

14,869subscribers

-217 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001889861203
TypeChannel
Username@almet_light
DescriptionГлавный новостной телеграм-канал Альметьевска! РКН: https://www.gosuslugi.ru/snet/ Прислать новость: @light_report_bot По рекламе: @light_tatarstan Наш чат: @almet_chat16
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 November 2026
Measurements held60
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/almet_light

Topic

Local community — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 9 other registered channels. This entry also sits inside a group of 12 channels linked by matching posts, directly or through other channels in the group; two members of the group may share no posts with each other. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@tatarstan/1367918 Aug 2026, 15:04 UTC@almet_light/17837 · this entry18 Aug 2026, 15:06 UTC1.002 minutes
@tatarstan/1382628 Aug 2026, 15:46 UTC@almet_light/18023 · this entry28 Aug 2026, 15:46 UTC1.00under a minute
@tatarstan/1385229 Aug 2026, 14:37 UTC@almet_light/18046 · this entry29 Aug 2026, 14:37 UTC1.00under a minute
@tatarstan/149582 Nov 2026, 16:01 UTC@almet_light/19384 · this entry2 Nov 2026, 16:08 UTC1.008 minutes
@tatarstan/150266 Nov 2026, 06:00 UTC@almet_light/19445 · this entry6 Nov 2026, 06:00 UTC1.00under a minute
@almet_light/17837 · this entry18 Aug 2026, 15:06 UTC@bugulma/2499518 Aug 2026, 15:06 UTC1.00under a minute
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@tatarstan122 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minutethis entry (76–46)
@bugulma112 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minute@bugulma (100–12)
@elabuga_light107 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minute@elabuga_light (101–6)
@aznakaevo103 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minute@aznakaevo (93–10)
@light_nizhnekamsk97 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minute@light_nizhnekamsk (91–6)
@chelny69 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minute@chelny (65–4)
@light_buinsk14 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minute@light_buinsk (14–0)
@light_bavly11 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minute@light_bavly (10–1)
@light_leninogorsk8 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minute@light_leninogorsk (8–0)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 454 of the 454 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 399 comparable posts for this entry, running 5 August 2026 to 11 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Of the group of 12 channels, the one whose matching posts we hold earliest is @bugulma. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the keys clone_copy · clone_mutual, last confirmed 12 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Channels linked by matching posts

This channel is in a group of 12 registered channels linked by matching posts, directly or through other channels in the group. This channel may share no posts with some of the channels listed below, and listed channels may share none with each other. Links are found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown in this list. “First” could only mean first in our own crawl, which depends on how deep we happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. Our one hand-check read 45 of the highest-confidence flagged pairs against the live Telegram pages. In 18 of them the live page showed a “Forwarded from” credit that our database had no record of, so reading that pair as an unattributed copy was wrong; the check did not measure who published first. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Near-verbatim matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

14,86515,08614,975.56 August 2026 — 15,086 subscribers6 August 2026 — 15,086 subscribers7 August 2026 — 15,083 subscribers8 August 2026 — 15,081 subscribers9 August 2026 — 15,072 subscribers10 August 2026 — 15,074 subscribers12 August 2026 — 15,068 subscribers14 August 2026 — 15,065 subscribers16 August 2026 — 15,067 subscribers17 August 2026 — 15,059 subscribers18 August 2026 — 15,054 subscribers19 August 2026 — 15,052 subscribers20 August 2026 — 15,055 subscribers21 August 2026 — 15,049 subscribers23 August 2026 — 15,050 subscribers24 August 2026 — 15,044 subscribers25 August 2026 — 15,063 subscribers26 August 2026 — 15,071 subscribers28 August 2026 — 15,072 subscribers29 August 2026 — 15,070 subscribers30 August 2026 — 15,064 subscribers31 August 2026 — 15,065 subscribers1 September 2026 — 15,061 subscribers2 September 2026 — 15,057 subscribers5 September 2026 — 15,052 subscribers8 September 2026 — 15,043 subscribers11 September 2026 — 15,044 subscribers13 September 2026 — 15,036 subscribers14 September 2026 — 15,031 subscribers16 September 2026 — 15,027 subscribers19 September 2026 — 15,021 subscribers26 September 2026 — 15,027 subscribers4 October 2026 — 14,962 subscribers8 October 2026 — 14,959 subscribers13 October 2026 — 14,951 subscribers14 October 2026 — 14,941 subscribers15 October 2026 — 14,943 subscribers16 October 2026 — 14,942 subscribers17 October 2026 — 14,938 subscribers18 October 2026 — 14,933 subscribers19 October 2026 — 14,931 subscribers20 October 2026 — 14,926 subscribers23 October 2026 — 14,929 subscribers24 October 2026 — 14,925 subscribers26 October 2026 — 14,918 subscribers27 October 2026 — 14,914 subscribers28 October 2026 — 14,904 subscribers29 October 2026 — 14,893 subscribers30 October 2026 — 14,891 subscribers31 October 2026 — 14,886 subscribers1 November 2026 — 14,881 subscribers2 November 2026 — 14,880 subscribers3 November 2026 — 14,884 subscribers4 November 2026 — 14,882 subscribers5 November 2026 — 14,881 subscribers6 November 2026 — 14,878 subscribers7 November 2026 — 14,867 subscribers8 November 2026 — 14,865 subscribers9 November 2026 — 14,870 subscribers11 November 2026 — 14,869 subscribers14,8696 August 202611 November 2026
60 measurements spanning 97 days, net -217. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 14,832–15,119 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 60
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Nov 2026, 11:0714,869-1
9 Nov 2026, 15:0614,870+5
8 Nov 2026, 08:5914,865-2
7 Nov 2026, 01:1714,867-11
6 Nov 2026, 04:1014,878-3
5 Nov 2026, 03:4514,881-1
4 Nov 2026, 02:5914,882-2
3 Nov 2026, 03:0714,884+4
2 Nov 2026, 00:5914,880-1
1 Nov 2026, 02:0814,881-5
31 Oct 2026, 01:4914,886-5
30 Oct 2026, 01:2014,891-2
29 Oct 2026, 04:4714,893-11
28 Oct 2026, 02:1114,904-10
27 Oct 2026, 03:3614,914-4
26 Oct 2026, 00:5614,918-7
24 Oct 2026, 01:4614,925-4
23 Oct 2026, 03:0514,929+3
20 Oct 2026, 19:5714,926-5
19 Oct 2026, 18:0014,931first reading

Engagement

500 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 73 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
5.42%
avg views ÷ 14,869 subscribers
Avg views / post
807
129 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.801%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
129
of 500 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 105 of 129 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 November 2026
Posts held500 (5 August 2026 – 11 November 2026)
Views total104,052
Reactions total682
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken11 Nov 2026, 19:09 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈10,300
Videos
≈2,690
Links
≈9,080

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
41m 18s
Average length
22s

Measured directly from 115 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

3,260 reactions across 410 posts, in 40 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 20.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤66220.3%
👍48714.9%
👎37211.4%
😱2327.12%
🤬2066.32%
🙏1564.79%
🔥1554.75%
🤡1424.36%
😢1243.80%
🤯1003.07%
😭922.82%
😡752.30%
🤣752.30%
💩451.38%
😁431.32%
👏421.29%
🕊260.798%
🖕260.798%
❤‍🔥250.767%
👀220.675%
20 further kinds1534.69%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 418 of the 500 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,260 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 500 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 11 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
3
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 499 we hold a reading for · 0.4%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @almet_light. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 500 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 August 2026 to 11 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Advertising

Ad load
3.40%
17 of 500 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
17
posts carrying an erid · 11 distinct tokens
Median views · ads
694
over 17 measured posts
Median views · rest
896
over 482 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. They are printed side by side with the count behind each rather than as a ratio: an ad and an ordinary post are not otherwise matched — for topic, for length, for hour of day — so the gap between them is a description of two groups and not the effect of one being an ad.

Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
eridPostsFirst seenLast seen
CQH36pWzJqEgsGD8mxPjJHRxA9Jd4xt4niHdx5gV7HL6Qv45 August 202617 August 2026
2VtzqvTz39g37 November 202611 November 2026
CQH36pWzJqEgsGD8x1CvHsjuQZp1sr7ozZSwNeAsjx75Ea215 August 202621 August 2026
2VtzqunoUaX127 August 202627 August 2026
2Vtzqvmb79G12 November 20262 November 2026
2VtzqwCN9gw130 August 202630 August 2026
CQH36pWzJqEgsGD8o2oFTYYrxYgaqz8ysvRLL9RqBZ171y114 August 202614 August 2026
CQH36pWzJqEgsGD8pcFV4xWKHKjBGuVDnLgiHpLqn1CBok111 August 202611 August 2026
CQH36pWzJqEgsGD8tU8NNdjYjF7hqcHCKyx9qzorHxKmCz114 August 202614 August 2026
CQH36pWzJqEgsGD8undWhcQJqM67mLSQtXeqKr1qUMceG4114 August 202614 August 2026
CQH36pWzJqEgsGD8yt3oo3DB2bhYkJyeEhEqHyhjZ8uWms131 August 202631 August 2026

A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.

Measured over the 500 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 11 November 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 11 of 129 posts held from the last 30 days (8.53%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

11 Nov 2026, 17:04 UTC342 views3 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Прогноз погоды☀️ ❤️ — Норм

❤3

11 Nov 2026, 16:22 UTC503 views4 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

💡 В Комсомольском парке Альметьевска почти не работают гирлянды Жители жалуются на неисправное освещение над пешеходными дорожками. По их словам, участок от улицы Чехова до Толстого полностью не горит, от Пугачёва до Радищева работает около 40 метров из 400, а на отрезке от Чехова до проспекта Тукая перегорела примерно половина лампочек. До Нового года остаётся всё меньше времени. Жители надеются, что обслуживающая…

❤2🤬1😢1

11 Nov 2026, 12:55 UTC519 views1 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

📩 НОВАЯ ПРЕДЛОЖКА — НОВЫЕ ЦЕНЫ! Мы обновили условия сотрудничества и повысили вознаграждение за интересные материалы. 🚨 Стали свидетелем ДТП, пожара, происшествия или необычного события? У вас есть фото, видео или важная информация? Теперь за действительно интересные и эксклюзивные материалы можно получить до 10 000 ₽! 💰 КАК ПОЛУЧИТЬ ВОЗНАГРАЖДЕНИЕ? 1️⃣ Отправьте фото, видео или информацию в наш бот. 2️⃣ Укажите…

❤1

11 Nov 2026, 12:18 UTC545 views6 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

🏆 Педагог из Альметьевска победила во всероссийском конкурсе «Знание.Наставники» Учитель английского языка и педагог-наставник гимназии №1 имени Р. Фахретдина Айгуль Ахмадиева стала победителем конкурса. Она представила авторский подход к просветительской работе и решению педагогических задач. Её проект получил высокую оценку экспертов. Конкурс организовало Российское общество «Знание» совместно с Министерством пр…

❤3👍2🔥1

11 Nov 2026, 11:20 UTC621 views7 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

⚠️ После гибели мужчины под завалами гаража в Альметьевске прокуратура начала проверку Речь идёт о заброшенных гаражах на улице Шевченко, где обрушилась плита перекрытия. Под завалами погиб мужчина, его тело извлекли спасатели. Прокуратура проверит бездействие исполкома по вопросу признания объекта бесхозным и установки ограждения. По итогам проверки при наличии оснований примут меры прокурорского реагирования. 🤬 …

😱4🔥1🤬1😢1

11 Nov 2026, 10:20 UTC654 views13 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

👁 В Альметьевске врачи вернули зрение 96-летней женщине после двух лет слепоты Пациентка поступила в офтальмологическое отделение Альметьевской ЦРБ с осложнённой катарактой. Женщина не различала даже свет. В других медицинских учреждениях ей отказывали в операции из-за возраста и высоких рисков. Хирурги больницы провели операцию по замене помутневшего хрусталика на искусственную линзу. Уже на следующий день пациент…

❤8🔥4👍1

11 Nov 2026, 09:33 UTC621 views1 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

❗️ Внимание! На территории Республики Татарстан ОТМЕНЕН режим «Беспилотная опасность». 😀 Подписаться 💬 Прислать новость и получить деньги 📲 Наш канал в Макс!

👎1

11 Nov 2026, 08:39 UTC661 views8 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Video

🚰 В Альметьевске жители жалуются на ржавую горячую воду По словам подписчиков, в доме №31 на улице Нефтяников из кранов постоянно течёт грязная вода с ржавым оттенком. Новость прислал подписчик. Вы так же можете прислать новость в бот @light_report_bot и заработать деньги.🫵 А у вас дома какая горячая вода? 👍 — Чистая, без проблем 👎 — Тоже течёт ржавая 👀 — Иногда меняет цвет 😆 Подписаться 💬 Прислать новость и пол…

👀3👎3👍2

11 Nov 2026, 07:29 UTC616 views5 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Video

⚠️ В Альметевске под завалами заброшенного гаража нашли тело мужчины Обрушение плиты перекрытия произошло на улице Шевченко. После поступления сообщения на номер 112 спасатели Альметьевской поисково-спасательной службы разобрали завалы с помощью тяжёлой техники и аварийно-спасательного инструмента. Под плитой обнаружили погибшего. Тело передали полиции, личность мужчины устанавливается. Обстоятельства происшествия …

🙏3😢1😱1

11 Nov 2026, 07:02 UTC605 views3 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

🚱 В микрорайоне РТС Альметьевска аварийно отключили воду На водоводе в районе улицы Дружбы произошла авария. По информации Водоканала, без холодной воды остались: - ул. Геофизическая, дома 1, 3, 5, 7, 1Б, 11, 13, 15, 31; - ул. Дружбы, дома 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 15, 7А; - ул. Луговая, дома 3, 4, 5, 7, 9, 11. Также отключение затронуло детский сад №26 и котельную №14. Водоснабжение обещают восстановить после з…

🤬1😢1😱1

11 Nov 2026, 06:02 UTC581 viewsread 11 November 2026
Advertisementerid 2VtzqvTz39gVideo

🔥 А ВДРУГ ИМЕННО ВАМ ДОСТАНЕТСЯ ОДИН ИЗ ТРЁХ АЭРОГРИЛЕЙ? 🎁 Ко Дню мамы БАНЧ подготовил для вас настоящий сюрприз! 💐❤️ Мы решили порадовать сразу трёх счастливчиков и разыграть 3 аэрогриля, которые станут отличным помощником на каждой кухне! 🍗✨ Представьте: любимые блюда, аппетитная хрустящая корочка и вкусные семейные ужины — а техника достанется совершенно бесплатно! Как принять участие? ❤️ Подпишитесь на наши социа…

11 Nov 2026, 05:46 UTC613 views5 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

🚱 В Бигашево отключили холодную воду на пяти улицах С 08:30 из-за подключения нового водопровода на улице Ермакова прекратили подачу холодной воды в частном секторе микрорайона. Без воды остались улицы: - Бигаш; - К. Насыри; - Ф. Карима; - Х. Такташа; - Макаренко. Водоснабжение обещают восстановить после завершения работ. 😢 — Снова без воды 😆 Подписаться 💬 Прислать новость и получить деньги 📲 Наш канал в Макс!

❤2🤬1😢1😱1

Showing the 12 most recent of 500 posts we hold for @almet_light. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@almet_light edited 3 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
19 August 2026
Most recent edit
4 November 2026

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 1 post on @almet_light as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
13 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
13 August 2026
Median time before seen missing
27 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Альметьевск 1
@almetyevsk_1 · 84,898
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 30 here — alongside 29 others — read 18 August 2026
Светлый Татарстан
@tatarstan · 23,827
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 30 here — alongside 29 others — read 16 September 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Светлый Альметьевск” (@almet_light), 14,869 subscribers as measured 11 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/almet_light.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.