
Channel
Metanoia's journey
@almarrimona
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
5,000subscribers
-110 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001011922484 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @almarrimona |
| Created | Between 1 December 2015 and 31 March 2016 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 1 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 14 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/almarrimona |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 13 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Sept 2026, 13:18 | 5,000 | -10 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 18:18 | 5,010 | -12 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 11:21 | 5,022 | -22 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 09:17 | 5,044 | -12 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 12:35 | 5,056 | no change |
| 30 Aug 2026, 01:33 | 5,056 | -15 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 23:58 | 5,071 | -6 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 23:55 | 5,077 | -9 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 03:34 | 5,086 | -4 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 11:57 | 5,090 | -6 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 05:08 | 5,096 | -3 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 20:45 | 5,099 | -10 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:01 | 5,109 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:12 | 5,110 | first reading |
Engagement
Posts not read yet. This entry is on the register from its profile alone; the post reader has not reached it. Engagement figures appear here once posts have actually been measured — we do not publish a rate before we have the readings behind it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@SmartsWay · 91,328
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 17 August 2026
@iishafag · 28,700
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 9 September 2026
@drrmohh · 39,866
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 31 August 2026
@CoachAfaf · 35,840
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 2 September 2026
@emansou6 · 126,940
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 17 August 2026
@al_pkrah · 26,778
Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 11 September 2026
This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Metanoia's journey” (@almarrimona), 5,000 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/almarrimona.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.