5 measurements spanning 11 days, net -33. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,939–3,982 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
16 Aug 2026, 22:24
3,944
-10
13 Aug 2026, 12:09
3,954
-16
10 Aug 2026, 11:28
3,970
-7
7 Aug 2026, 05:01
3,977
no change
6 Aug 2026, 05:06
3,977
first reading
Engagement
21 posts held, back to 26 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 4 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
19.0%
avg views ÷ 3,944 subscribers
Avg views / post
749
10 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.51%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
10
of 21 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held
21 (26 June 2026 – 7 August 2026)
Views total
7,491
Reactions total
113
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
8 Aug 2026, 05:45 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
239 reactions across 20 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
83
34.7%
🔥
50
20.9%
👍
44
18.4%
😁
18
7.53%
🤝
13
5.44%
✍
9
3.77%
👎
9
3.77%
🐳
7
2.93%
🏆
3
1.26%
😢
2
0.837%
🤯
1
0.418%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 21 of the 21 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 259reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 26 June 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Что такое керри-трейд и как он влияет на финансовые рынки
Ключевые слова: База, Безопасность и психология
Большинство криптанов смотрят прежде всего на ставку ФРС как на долгосрочное мерило условий на рынке. Но деньги, которые двигают акции и крипту, зависят не только от стоимости доллара. Важную роль играет и Япония, которая десятилетиями оставалась источником дешёвого финансирования.
❓ Как работает керри-трейд
…
Закон о регуляции крипторынка в РФ
Ключевые слова: База, Инструкция
21 июля Госдума приняла закон о цифровых валютах, а 24 июля его одобрил Совет Федерации и направил президенту. На 1 августа официального сообщения о подписании еще нет.
Если документ подпишут в принятой редакции, основная часть новых правил заработает с 1 сентября 2026 года.
🔎Что закрепляет закон
Криптовалюта получает единое определение имущества…
Про влияние CLARITY Act на крипторынок
Ключевые слова: База
Последний месяц мы наблюдаем, как крипторынок двигается не от нового нарратива в DeFi и не от макростатистики, а от новостей из Сената США про закон, который многие даже не читали. Это CLARITY Act - и для криптана он важен не меньше, чем цена BTC на споте, потому что от него зависит: куда в принципе может заходить институциональный капитал.
❗️ В чём тут д…
3 месяца работы в одно лицо по 14 часов в день
И наконец-то я увидел это заветное сообщение от своего агента.
К концу недели будет полностью рабочий продукт аналогов которому, на рынке крипты и нейросетей, просто нет. А на следующей неделе проведу стрим с презентацией и запущу паблик тестирования для желающих быть причастными к истории.
Не выключай уведомления в канале, а то пропустишь 8 чудо света.
@almanah_cryp…
API: как подключить источники данных к ИИ-агенту
Ключевые слова: База, Инструкция, Инструменты и лайфхаки
В прошлых постах мы уже упоминали API, когда разбирали инструменты для ончейн-анализа. Теперь разберёмся чуть глубже: что именно происходит за кулисами и как API помогает подключать внешние сервисы к ИИ-агенту.
🎓 API - это шлюз между программами.
Через него ИИ-агент может подключаться к внешним сервисам и по…
Как отслеживать крупные движения токенов
Ключевые слова: база, безопасность и психология
Продолжим изучать тему крупных продаж, которые частенько влияют на цену криптотокенов. И в этом посте разберём основные инструменты и стратегии для поиска информации.
🔎 Инструменты для поиска инфы.
Сразу подметим, что одни инструменты будут помогать отслеживать важные даты, а вторые мониторить процесс движения токенов.
• Гд…
Как теряют деньги на инвестициях в крипту
Ключевые слова: база, безопасность и психология
Многие заходят в крипту с мыслью: если проект полезный и популярный, его токен должен расти. Но это не всегда так: проект может зарабатывать и привлекать пользователей, а его токен при этом годами падать. В этой публикации разберёмся почему так происходит.
📊 Почему токен не равен акции.
У акции есть понятная логика: компания…
❤10🔥5👍3
Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @almanah_cryptana. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 6 most recent of 9 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Рубрика «проверь себя»:
какое направление для заработка наиболее актуально в 2026 году?
Ресёрч ончейна и информационного потока через AI-агентов для проведения сделок85%
Отработка проектов по формату ретродропов5%
Торговля на фьючерсах с плечом х5010%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 26 June 2026 to 7 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 828,312 of 1,480,975entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Альманах криптоинвестора” (@almanah_cryptana), 3,944 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/almanah_cryptana.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.