Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Madani Pen || لـبحـوث الـتخـرج

Channel

Madani Pen || لـبحـوث الـتخـرج

@almadanimcq

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,508subscribers

-10 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002029600239
TypeChannel
Username@almadanimcq
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live5 September 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged3 times, most recently 5 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/almadanimcq

Growth

1,5081,5181,5138 August 2026 — 1,518 subscribers8 August 2026 — 1,518 subscribers11 August 2026 — 1,516 subscribers14 August 2026 — 1,513 subscribers18 August 2026 — 1,514 subscribers20 August 2026 — 1,513 subscribers24 August 2026 — 1,512 subscribers27 August 2026 — 1,511 subscribers29 August 2026 — 1,508 subscribers8 August 202629 August 2026
9 measurements spanning 22 days, net -10. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,507–1,520 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
29 Aug 2026, 23:071,508-3
27 Aug 2026, 06:231,511-1
24 Aug 2026, 06:551,512-1
20 Aug 2026, 20:131,513-1
18 Aug 2026, 05:521,514+1
14 Aug 2026, 20:561,513-3
11 Aug 2026, 02:351,516-2
8 Aug 2026, 06:121,518no change
8 Aug 2026, 02:161,518first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 23 April 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
4.84%
avg views ÷ 1,508 subscribers
Avg views / post
73.0
1 post measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
1
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held20 (23 April 20267 August 2026)
Views total73
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 02:16 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

37 reactions across 10 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 83.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
3183.8%
❤‍🔥410.8%
😍25.41%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 37 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 23 April 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 20:55 UTC73 viewsread 8 August 2026

تفاصيل لزوم وجودها بكل بحث علمي✨. ✅مشكلة البحث: شنو المشكلة أو السؤال اللي دا تدرسونه؟ 🎓هدف البحث: شنو تريدون تثبتون أو تعرفون من الدراسة؟ 🌟الدراسات السابقة: شنو الباحثين قبلك كتبوا عن الموضوع؟ ✍طريقة البحث: شلون جمعتوا المعلومات وحللتوها؟ 🥸النتائج والاستنتاج: شنو طلعت النتائج وشنو استفدتوا منها؟ كـل مـايـخـص بـحـوث الـتـخرج @almadanimcq للاستفسار راسلونا: @madani_pen

12 Jul 2026, 09:03 UTC248 viewsread 8 August 2026

أخطاء شائعة بأبحاث التخرج ✨اختيار عنوان غير واضح أو واسع جدًا. ⭐الاعتماد على مصادر غير موثوقة أو قديمة. ⭐وجود أخطاء في تصميم الاستبيان أو اختيار العينة. ⭐عرض النتائج بدون تحليل أو مناقشة.(شرح) ⭐عدم توثيق المراجع بشكل صحيح أو الوقوع بالسرقة الأدبية. كـل مـايـخـص بـحـوث الـتـخرج @almadanimcq للاستفسار راسلونا: @madani_pen

6 Jul 2026, 14:00 UTC365 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026

. شلون تسوي استبيان ناجح؟ خلي الأسئلة واضحة. لا تكون طويلة. ابتعد عن الأسئلة الموجهة.(تحيزية) رتبها من السهل للصعب. جرّبه على كم شخص قبل التوزيع. كـل مـايـخـص بـحـوث الـتـخرج @almadanimcq للاستفسار راسلونا: @madani_pen

1

29 Jun 2026, 13:33 UTC461 viewsread 8 August 2026

قبل كل بحث تركز 1. شلون تختار عنوان بحث مناسب؟ يكون واضح ومحدد. جديد أو بيه فكرة مميزة. تگدر تنفذه بالوقت المتاح. أكو مصادر كافية عنه. يناسب اختصاصك. 2. شلون تبحث عن مصادر علمية موثوقة؟ استخدم Google Scholar أو PubMed. اعتمد على المجلات العلمية. لا تعتمد على أي موقع عشوائي. اختار مصادر حديثة. دوّن المراجع أول بأول. كـل مـايـخـص بـحـوث الـتـخرج @almadanimcq للاستفسار راسلونا: @madani_pen

23 Jun 2026, 20:05 UTC506 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026

الفرق بين التقرير والسمنر ✨التقرير يُقرأ السمنر يُعرض التقرير تنطيه للشخص يقره. السمنر توقف وتشرحه بنفسك. ✨التقرير تفصيلي، السمنر مختصر بالتقرير تكتب التفاصيل كاملة. بالسمنر تذكر أهم النقاط فقط. ✨التقرير يعتمد على النص، السمنر على الشرح بالتقرير القارئ يعتمد على المكتوب. بالسمنر الحضور يعتمدون على كلامك وشرحك. ✨التقرير بيه معلومات أكثر جداول، مراجع، تفاصيل ومنهجية. بالسمنر تعرض الزبدة والنتائج المهمة. ✨ا

2

19 Jun 2026, 15:59 UTC485 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026

شلون تبدأ بالبحث: 1.حدد موضوعك مضبوط لا تختار عنوان عام خلي موضوعك محدد وواضح شنو تريد تدرس بالضبط كلما كان العنوان دقيق كانت الدراسة هادفة اكثر ومهمة ومرغوبة بالمستقبل كمصدر . 2.اقرأ شوية مصادر قبل لا تكتب حتى تفهم الفكرة وتعرف شنو موجود بالدراسات السابقة هذا يساعدنا بطريقة الكتابة شلون راح تكون . 3.اكتب أهداف البحث شنو تريد توصل له؟ لا تبدي بدون أهداف واضحة هيج تسهل عليك البحث بالمصادر اكثر. 4.سوّي خطة بسي

1

18 Jun 2026, 14:05 UTC428 viewsread 8 August 2026

أكثر 5 أخطاء نشوفها بأبحاث التخرج عنوان حلو بس ما يطابق أهداف البحث يصير البحث ماشي باتجاه والعنوان باتجاه ثاني. عينة قليلة أو مو ممثلة للمجتمع فتطلع النتائج ضعيفة وما نكدر نعممها. أسئلة الاستبيان مو واضحة أو متحيزة تخلي المشارك يجاوب بطريقة معينة وتخرب النتائج. عرض النتائج بدون تفسير يحطون جداول وأرقام بس ما يشرحون شنو معناها. استنتاجات وتوصيات مو مبنية على النتائج يكتبون كلام عام ما إله علاقة مباشرة بالبي

16 Jun 2026, 13:42 UTC548 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026

شلون اكتب تقرير ناجح للدكتور او لنشاط علمي عنوان واضح يوضح شنو موضوع التقرير بشكل مباشر مقدمة قصيرة تشرح الهدف منه سويناه لغرض عرض مشاكل معينة او شرح فكرة او تطبيق عملي ونتائجه . معلومات دقيقة وموثوقة نحصلها من منصة Scoops او pubmed ترتيب وتنظيم للأفكار والعناوين يعني ابدي من التعريف والهدف والشغل العملي وانتهي بالنتائج والمناقشة او الرأي حول العمل يعتبر مناقشة نتائج واضحة تبين شنو توصلت له يعني قلت او زادت او

1

7 Jun 2026, 09:31 UTC616 viewsread 8 August 2026

كـل مـايـخـص بـحـوث الـتـخرج @almadanimcq للاستفسار راسلونا: @madani_pen

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @almadanimcq. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Madani Pen || لـبحـوث الـتخـرج” (@almadanimcq), 1,508 subscribers as measured 29 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/almadanimcq.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.