Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Шарю за пушки

Channel

Шарю за пушки

@allweapons

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

942subscribers

-11 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001726943452
TypeChannel
Username@allweapons
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live2 October 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 2 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/allweapons

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 19 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 72% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

9429549487 August 2026 — 953 subscribers7 August 2026 — 953 subscribers14 August 2026 — 954 subscribers27 August 2026 — 952 subscribers3 September 2026 — 947 subscribers11 September 2026 — 946 subscribers18 September 2026 — 943 subscribers2 October 2026 — 942 subscribers7 August 20262 October 2026
8 measurements spanning 56 days, net -11. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 940–956 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
2 Oct 2026, 18:20942-1
18 Sept 2026, 19:40943-3
11 Sept 2026, 11:35946-1
3 Sept 2026, 00:34947-5
27 Aug 2026, 03:03952-2
14 Aug 2026, 13:27954+1
7 Aug 2026, 08:47953no change
7 Aug 2026, 08:37953first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 22 November 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 25 December 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

845 reactions across 18 posts, in 26 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 59.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 632557037977128320950459.6%
😁9811.6%
👍657.69%
😍404.73%
🔥293.43%
👌161.89%
🤯111.30%
☃91.07%
🙊91.07%
🤔80.947%
👏70.828%
🤝60.71%
🤩60.71%
❤‍🔥50.592%
🌭50.592%
💊50.592%
🥰50.592%
🤮40.473%
🐳30.355%
❤20.237%
6 further kinds80.947%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 845 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 22 November 2024 to 25 December 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

25 Dec 2024, 20:52 UTC≈1,310 views74 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Для тех, кто не знал, как на самом деле устроен ДШК

custom 632557037977128320939😁28🥰4🍾2🐳1

19 Dec 2024, 20:56 UTC≈1,420 views46 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Мини-люди присутствуют?

custom 632557037977128320930☃9👌6💅1

19 Dec 2024, 20:55 UTC≈1,250 views55 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @gunenciclopediaPhoto

Миниган? Это что-то для мини-людей? 🔫 @gunenciclopedia

custom 632557037977128320938😁12🔥4🗿1

13 Dec 2024, 18:45 UTC≈1,430 views57 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Как выяснилось, про такую пушку как Walther PDP слышали немногие, так давайте это исправим. Что можно заметить интересного? Ствол достаточно новый, разработан в 2021 году немецкими оружейниками из Walther. Расшифровывается PDP как Performance Duty Pistol, то есть что-то вроде «пистолета для служебного пользования». Поскольку PDP был создан как прямой конкурент хорошо известному всем (особенно нам) Глоку, легко дога…

custom 632557037977128320928👍21🔥8

7 Dec 2024, 18:20 UTC≈1,160 views35 reactionsread 7 August 2026

PDP?

custom 632557037977128320925🤔6🤯4

7 Dec 2024, 18:20 UTC≈1,080 views40 reactionsread 7 August 2026

А вот и наш долгожданный молодец. Сложно было?

custom 632557037977128320929🤝5🔥4👍2

7 Dec 2024, 17:51 UTC≈1,070 views33 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Я понял, тут у нас случился легкий затык. А если вот так?

custom 632557037977128320922😁9🤔2

6 Dec 2024, 21:02 UTC≈1,100 views36 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Добрейшего пятничного вечера, пацантрэ. Давненько у нас угадаек не было, да? Давайте-ка чуть напряжем мозги и попробуем догадаться, о чем идет речь. В гугл не лезем, мы же не караси Итак, перечень фактов про пушку: - это пистолет, причем страйкер (то есть имеет механизм, в котором отсутствует курок) - отличается отличной эргономикой, есть возможность настроить пистолет как под левую, так и под правую руку - явным…

custom 632557037977128320924👍6🔥6

1 Dec 2024, 19:33 UTC996 views53 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Месть итальянцев за макароны по-флотски?

😁33custom 632557037977128320919👍1

1 Dec 2024, 19:33 UTC973 views42 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @gunenciclopediaPhoto

Калаш для тех, кто презирает мощность у патронов (и капсюли) Интересно, что подумал бы Калашников 🔫 @gunenciclopedia

custom 632557037977128320927🙊9💊5🤮1

29 Nov 2024, 20:30 UTC≈1,010 views56 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Мы не коснулись темы с запретом «Гюрзы» в Штатах. Пора исправиться. Наверняка вы все в курсе, что во многих американских штатах гражданские лица без особых проблем могут приобрести для личного пользования хоть пулемет. Так почему же запрещен какой-то пистолет? Вообще все достаточно логично. Мы как-то давненько разбирали вопрос с ПБС (то есть глушителями), разрешение на которые в Штатах для рядового гражданина тоже …

custom 632557037977128320931👍17❤‍🔥5❤2🤝1

28 Nov 2024, 20:56 UTC773 views72 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Думаете, что старички наподобие M1911 не могут выглядеть современно? Зацените модификацию Fowler Vanta 9: двухрядный магазин, площадка под оптику и 4000 баксов в качестве прайса. Че скажете?

custom 632557037977128320948😍14🌭5🔥3🐳2

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @allweapons. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 2 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Шарю за пушки” (@allweapons), 942 subscribers as measured 2 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/allweapons.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.