Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Все наши демоны/ визуальная новелла/ рукопись

@allourdemons

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

884subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002421751671
TypeChannel
Username@allourdemons
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 8 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/allourdemons

Growth

8848 Aug 2026, 11:47 — 884 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 18:37 — 884 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 11:478 Aug 2026, 18:37
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 883–885 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 18:37884no change
8 Aug 2026, 11:47884first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 21 October 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
33.0%
avg views ÷ 884 subscribers
Avg views / post
292
1 post measured
Reaction rate
16.4%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 17 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 31 July 2026
Posts held17 (21 October 202531 July 2026)
Views total292
Reactions total48
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 11:47 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

673 reactions across 17 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 49.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
33449.6%
🔥9514.1%
🥰7010.4%
💋578.47%
❤‍🔥395.79%
🍓131.93%
💅121.78%
💘111.63%
🎉101.49%
🙊91.34%
💔81.19%
👻50.743%
🤩40.594%
👎20.297%
🤯20.297%
😭10.149%
🦄10.149%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 673reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 21 October 2025 to 31 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

31 Jul 2026, 09:39 UTC292 views48 reactionsread 8 August 2026

давно не виделись в уличных гонках я хочу реанимировать этот канал, но его расширить под все визуальные новеллы, которые мы выпускаем со Степаном сейчас там есть 2 эпизода "Мои жестокие друзья", про магию, аристократов и убийство "Все наши демоны" тоже скоро появятся там! я застопорилась с проектом из-за визуала, но мы натренировались на другой истории, так что пойдет проще надеюсь кто-то еще ждет!

🔥3011💅6🦄1

31 Jan 2026, 15:31 UTC≈1,010 views14 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Poll

какой выбираем

  1. 137%
  2. 253%
  3. 327%

The shares total 117%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

14

31 Jan 2026, 15:31 UTC904 views40 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

в чем смысл делать новеллу если не можешь делать slay наряды

🔥26💋9👎2💅21

28 Jan 2026, 10:24 UTC≈1,020 views37 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Поразительный навык - бесить его даже своим бездействием. Калеб цокнул языком и спрятал руки в карманы, потому что в ее пристутсвии те казались слишком грязными и громоздкими. Ему нужно извиниться, но что за конкретно? Нужно сказать, что он ее понимает? Так, он ее не понимает. И точно не поймет, какого пережить то, что пережила ее подруга. Даже пробовать воображать не стоит. Он не настолько идиот, чтобы верить, что т

25💔8🤩4

23 Jan 2026, 08:30 UTC≈1,050 views60 reactionsread 8 August 2026

финал 7 главы вышел!!! кто бы мог поверить! пока только на фикбуке в читалке первая версия рукописи, без редактуры. мы постараемся все заменить в читалке, про новые моменты я напишу отдельный пост! еще очень хорошие отзывы пришли! спасибо огромное!!!

❤‍🔥3814🎉8

9 Jan 2026, 11:03 UTC≈1,350 views59 reactionsread 8 August 2026

И весь его мир схлопнулся до звука ее смеха. Пойзон, его Пойзон, неприкасаемая, засмеялась запрокинув голову, острые плечи задрожали, и вдруг Калеб не обнаружил в ней ни одной знакомой ему черты. Кто-то иной предстал перед ним - девушка, незнакомка, сотканная из колючего света и мягких клыков. Насыщенная, живая, из другой жизни. Сердце его рухнуло куда-то вниз, а сквозь чувства пролез вопрос: увидел ли он кого-то дру

🥰4011🔥8

8 Jan 2026, 11:06 UTC≈1,110 views40 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

мне нужно перерисовать лейн и калеба так

29💘11

8 Jan 2026, 09:16 UTC938 views36 reactionsread 8 August 2026

кстати, что я еще думала сделать 1) найти художника и заказать обложку, чтобы были визуальные ассоциации. но такой тонкий момент конечно 2) возможно нанять лит. редактора, чтобы мне было полегче. но не понимаю их цену на рынке и стоит ли оно того.

36

8 Jan 2026, 09:12 UTC893 views69 reactionsread 8 August 2026

я продолжила редактуру, но только ради Степана, чтобы мы снова обсуждали главы за завтраком, ну и чтобы было хоть как-то что-то закончено. сейчас буду ныть я полгода назад забросила редактуру, потому что было мало фидбэка. читалку приложение не особо оценили - окей. буду выкладывать на фикбук - там тоже тишина. буду вести контент - ну ладно. может новость о новелле приведет читателей к рукописи и мою работу оценят

💋4524

7 Jan 2026, 09:06 UTC830 views12 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Poll

что делать Сончи?

  1. доредактируй рукопись целиком наконец-то58%
  2. выстави черновик всей истории и забей18%
  3. занимайся только новеллой и не рыпайся24%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

12

7 Jan 2026, 09:05 UTC850 views33 reactionsread 8 August 2026

у меня проснулась фэнтези жилка... так. давайте перекличку, кому прям НАДО чтобы я доредактировала рукопись и полностью ее выставила. потому что я в сомнениях нужно ли сейчас на это переключаться

33

5 Jan 2026, 13:29 UTC882 views65 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

до/после рендер я делаю дизайн, черновик и само лицо @sayan_lua делает одежду, рендер и волосы! все благодарности ей! мне очень нравится результат! есть конечно и какой-то шарм в черновиках, но я бы одна точно не сдвинулась с места

42🔥17🥰2❤‍🔥1🍓1🎉1💋1

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @allourdemons. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

31 Jan 2026, 15:31 UTCAnonymous Poll162 voters

какой выбираем

  1. 137%
  2. 253%
  3. 327%

The shares total 117%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

7 Jan 2026, 09:06 UTCAnonymous Poll165 voters

что делать Сончи?

  1. доредактируй рукопись целиком наконец-то58%
  2. выстави черновик всей истории и забей18%
  3. занимайся только новеллой и не рыпайся24%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 21 October 2025 to 31 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,120,059 of 1,189,255entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Все наши демоны/ визуальная новелла/ рукопись” (@allourdemons), 884 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/allourdemons.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.