Channel
@alliures
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
2subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 14 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002641758669 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @alliures |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 14 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/alliures |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 20:37 | 2 | no change |
| 14 Aug 2026, 08:16 | 2 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 20 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 13 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (20 May 2026 – 11 August 2026) |
| Views total | 185 |
| Reactions total | 1 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 14 Aug 2026, 08:16 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🍓 | 1 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 20 May 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
hello kakak, terimakasih banyak atas kerjakeras kakak, aku gapunya kritik dan saran tapi aku mau rate pengerjaan 10/10. aku beli wtbs ini pertama kali, aku kira bakalan zonk tapi kamu ternyata rajin bangettt aku suka banget pake jasa wtbs di kamu. amanah dan beneran bisa dipercaya jam kerja juga mantap banget dan aku ga nyesel malahan pengen beli lagi huhu, terimakasih banyak kakak 💖
OUYA INI HR NYAAA, MAAF LUPAAA 😭😭😭😭 first time nemu kamu karena ada yang promosiin eexiles as b, dan pas aku coba sendiri ternyata BENERAN SE GACOR ITU HEYYYYY???? dalam sehari 1 base, 3 div aja dan bisa hit mf sebanyak itu... BWNER2 KAGET BANGETTTT, SOALNYAAAA aku kayak sampe melototin base pun ga sampe sebanyak itu dapetnya, tapi kok kamu bisa c 😭😭😭😭 REAL SE MANTAP ITU, SE RAJIN ITU, HOLD CUMA SEKALI, DANNNN BENER2…
hii, thank youu so much yaa udah handle wtb aku. walaupun cuma sehari, tapi akuu puas bangeeett karena kamu rajin dan aku sering liat di base. overall 100/100 yaa, akuu gak ada kritik apapun kok. terimakasih banyaak yaa, sukses selaluu kak cath dan @eexiles ♥️
first of all, terima kasih banyak yaa udah mau take orderan WTB gua, adminnya rajin banget ngeshare wtb. terus view channel gua juga makin naik, bahkan beberapa orderan udah mulai masuk. seneng banget sama hasilnya, makasih banyak yaa atas bantuannya. pokoknya best banget pelayanannya, semoga makin rame orderannya dan sukses terus!
thank u so much kaa udah nge handle wtb aku yang cuma 1 day.. tapi jujur kerja kaka nya sangat memuaskan! aku udaah dapet beberapa cust yang order custom karena kaka nyaa! super duper worth, kaka nya juga ngga banyak hold dan proof nya jugaa banyak! pantes buat dapet bintang 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟! thank u kakk i'll give u 10000/10
HELLAU, KAKKKK! shdjja, thank you for your service selama 7 hari ini kakakkkk! aku bener bener puasss karena kakakk rajin banget dan juga selalu berkabar setiap hold, store aku jadii lumayan rame AJSJSKKS 😔🩷 cintabgt aku, nyoba wtb kakak soalnya direkomennn, ternyata beneran gacorr. timakasyiii banyak yaaah 🩷
aku kasih rate 100/10 untuk kinerja kamu. jarang hold, nawarinnya juga gacor, sering berkabar, dan sangat sangat pas dikantong untuk harganya. thank you somuch cath!
makasih banyak ya kak! honestly aku puas banget sama servicenya. adminnya ramah, fast response, dan enak diajak komunikasi dari awal sampai selesai. prosesnya juga lancar, proof selalu di-update jadi bikin tenang. overall it was a really great experience, semoga store-nya makin berkembang dan makin banyak customer yaa. thank you so much! aku bakal repurchase lagi *nunggu restock catalog banyak* ♥️
10000000/10 SUMPAHH WTB NYA GACOR BANGET TERUS JUGA ADMINNYA BAIK BANGET AKU MINTA INI ITU DI TURUTIN TOPP MARKOTOP BANGET DEHH PELAYANAN NYA 😭😭😭🩷🩷🩷 UDAHMAH HARGANYA NYAMAN DI KANTON INIMAH BAKAL REPEAT ORDERR, THANK U YAA KK KK ADMIN 🩷🩷🩷🩷😭😭😭
JUJUR GACOR PARAAAH. aku pilih @eexiles ini awalnya karena ada buyer yang saranin store ini kan. TERNYATA BENERAN WORTH IT BANGET. LITERALLY 1 HARI TUH KAK CATH NYA BENERAN PM MULU. KAYAK AKU LIAT LIAT DARI PROOF YANG DIKASIH TUH BENERAN BANYAK BANGET ITU LEBIH DARI 100 KALI YA KAK CATH INI PM NYA. UDAH GITU KALAU HOLD NGASIH TAU JUHA LAGII. BENERAN WORTH THE TIME BANGET KAK CATH INII TUHH. LITERALLY NO CRITICISM AT …
GACOORRR, rajin banget jadi banyak yang order 🤍🤍 hold nya dikit aja alias dapet banyak menfess dalam sehari 1000/10 sukses teruusss ^___^
Hii sayaang, aku maau kasih honest review aku seminggu ini bersama service kamuu! Well as you can see here are my earnings for the previous week, with some noted half of it dari cust lama & premade aku and aprox totallnya +/- 300k or 400k & dari setengah itu were bcs of u; like 80% dari setengahnya itu kamu!😼👏🏻 I got a lot of new subscriber and a lot of eyes. Nah jadinya some days aku rasa day 3&4 apa 4&5 you are a b…
🍓1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @alliures. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,050,656 of 1,481,243entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“what they say.” (@alliures), 2 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/alliures.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.