Channel
@allcryptogems
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Polls · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
1subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001613556532 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @allcryptogems |
| Description | AllCryptoGems pulls all feeds from smaller Crypto influencer/gem channels and posts them here instantly. It's basically an All in One Feed of crypto calls but for smaller influencers. Centralized to make it easier to follow. |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 4 April 2022— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 14 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/allcryptogems |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 11:32 | 1 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 05:22 | 1 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 4 April 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 July 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
The owner of this channel has been inactive for the last 5 months. If they remain inactive for the next 19 days, they may lose their account and admin rights in this channel. The contents of the channel will remain accessible for all users.
To have it clear, don't buy the previous Token. They aim on relaunching!
Providing a quick update on ValiDefi, for those who are interested. They realized their contract mistake, and will pay Trynos to do the next contract (Good choice to my opinion, trynos is good) Since I called on recommending not holding, price went down Tokens they sent to the contract seems to have as a reason them thinking the tax tokens needed to reach some treshold before acting normally. Their project is cur…
Thank you everyone for the participation! Announcing the winners @LeaLann @iamstag @wellgamer789 @Solterrasa @Legacydev I have used a list of participants, and used Random.Org to find the winner. In any case I appreciate everyone comment as it'll be helpful for us and as well did some cool sharing for people's search too 😉💖 Anyway contract to the winners! DM me your wallets and i'll send you asap 👍
Is it time... is it? For ... Our number one giveaway channel to do another one? 💖 Lets do it! Lets reward people some more! 😄 I'm doing FIVE lootboxes Giveaway for two amazing and wonderful little Peepos of our channel! Requirements? EZ! Comment your favourite Milkomeda (ADA) influencers/channels/groups ! If you have no clue, its ok, just say you don't know, you'll be eligible as well. Most unique / Best calls o…
Imagine ETH #1 kek.
That does not sound good for BTC
Factory Launch on Milkomeda? With unique tokenomics ofc (After TFP fixings)
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
GM peepos! Hope you all doing alright! Today starts as a cool day for me... Happy I could get a good rest its been super harsh these days for me lol I'll be happy to do tons of coding today. TFP stuff and some more. I'll clearly give a gud interesting update today sers 😉 Stay tuned! 😎 Will also do a poll I'm curious about something !
And remember to stay hydrated and to drink your favorite MILK 🥛🥛🥛🥛🥛 Also joke aside Milkomeda so far is working very well. It has extremely low fees, very few people but it's growing quick, and transactions are super quick. Projects as well are sending pretty well. Beware tho, there are many many rugs and people who rug all day long. Other than this, it seems good so far. We'll see how it goes in the next days, if …
Sticker, posted without a caption
Congrats to @patoooooooooooooooooooo1 @darthanonymous3 @Tiojacale @PedroMarra1 @iamstag DM me your wallet sers. Remember to add Milkomeda (ADA) in your chains as well
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @allcryptogems. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Factory Launch on Milkomeda? With unique tokenomics ofc (After TFP fixings)
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
What chain do you like the most currently for launches?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 4 April 2022 to 9 July 2023. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
@allcryptogems named 5 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“AllCryptoGems” (@allcryptogems), 1 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/allcryptogems.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.