3 measurements spanning 9 days, net +2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,007–2,009 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
16 Aug 2026, 08:27
2,009
+2
7 Aug 2026, 15:02
2,007
no change
7 Aug 2026, 12:09
2,007
first reading
Engagement
14 posts held, back to 16 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
27.6%
avg views ÷ 2,009 subscribers
Avg views / post
554
13 posts measured
Reaction rate
10.6%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
13
of 14 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held
14 (16 July 2026 – 6 August 2026)
Views total
7,200
Reactions total
761
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
7 Aug 2026, 15:02 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
3m 17s
Average length
1m 06s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
812 reactions across 14 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 60.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
488
60.1%
🔥
146
18.0%
👍
54
6.65%
😍
40
4.93%
😁
39
4.80%
custom 5249483662541468844
13
1.60%
💔
11
1.35%
👏
8
0.985%
custom 5235969913016823374
7
0.862%
custom 5188208446461188962
4
0.493%
🙏
1
0.123%
🤔
1
0.123%
Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 812reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 16 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 14 we hold a reading for · 14%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @all_about_georgemichael. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 14 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 16 July 2026 to 6 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
То, о чём Джордж Майкл говорил нечасто…
Откровенное интервью после финала Faith Tour
Малага, начало июля 1989 года: перед 50 000 восторженными фанатами Джордж дал свой последний концерт. Незадолго до его возвращения в студию мы говорим о том, как он оценивает последние годы.
«Иногда моя работа меня злит, и в этой жизни я, вероятно, никогда не стану тем, кем на самом деле являюсь».
В расслабляющей атмосфере свежего…
В одном из интервью 80-х Джорджа Майкла и Эндрю Риджли спросили, с кем они мечтали встретиться.
Джордж Майкл:
«Нет смысла говорить вам, потому что она читает № 1! Но я хотел бы встретиться с Джейми Ли Кертис после просмотра фильма "Поменяться местами".»
Эндрю Риджли:
«Рейчел Уорд, Брук Шилдс и Настасья Кински — я влюблён во всех них! А ещё я хотел бы снова увидеть девушку, которую встретил на лыжном отдыхе в Итал…
Сегодня — 1 августа. 🌞
Последний месяц лета официально начался.
Пусть август будет таким же солнечным, беззаботным и наполненным хорошими моментами, как это видео с Джорджем. 💙
А как вы обычно проводите лето: море, бассейн, дача, путешествия или просто отдыхаете дома?
#GeorgeMichael #ДжорджМайкл
На официальном канале Джорджа Майкла опубликовали эти замечательные кадры. ❤️
И невозможно не обратить внимание на его кудри. Кажется, они ему невероятно шли — хотя, если честно, Джордж был из тех редких людей, которым подходил практически любой образ.
#GeorgeMichael #ДжорджМайкл
Друзья, вчера наша Илона посмотрела премьерный показ фильма Wham! в кинотеатре и поделилась со мной своими впечатлениями. ❤️
Решила поделиться её отзывом и с вами. А мы тем временем с нетерпением ждём выхода фильма на BBC и стриминговых сервисах. Как только он станет доступен, мы обязательно переведём его, озвучим и опубликуем на нашем канале. ❤️
❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️ знала что будет хорошо, но было в сто раз лучше)
В …
За каждым великим фильмом скрывается история, о которой зрители часто даже не подозревают...
Представляем вашему вниманию большое интервью с режиссером Майком Кристи, который впервые подробно рассказал, как создавался фильм Wham! 10 Days in China.
Почему работа над ним заняла десятилетия? Какие открытия сделали создатели во время поиска архивов? И какие неожиданные факты о поездке Wham! в Китай всплыли спустя более…
Представляем вашему вниманию большое эксклюзивное интервью с режиссером Майком Кристи — человеком, которому удалось оживить одну из самых легендарных и загадочных страниц в истории Wham!.
Вас ждут ранее неизвестные подробности создания фильма Wham! 10 Days in China, история найденных архивных пленок, откровения об Эндрю Риджли и Джордже Майкле, а также множество закулисных деталей, о которых раньше практически никто…
24 июля 1984 года мир впервые услышал Careless Whisper.
Вряд ли кто-то тогда мог предположить, что спустя десятилетия несколько первых нот этой песни будут узнавать миллионы людей по всему миру.
Careless Whisper стала не просто большим хитом. Она превратилась в одну из самых знаковых композиций в истории популярной музыки и навсегда связала имя Джорджа Майкла с настоящей музыкальной классикой.
Удивительно, что ист…
Редкий кадр Джорджа Майкла из фотосессии Криса Куффаро, 1988 год.
"Честно, вся эта идеальность образа реально раздражает меня. Вот, например, когда люди в Америке подходили ко мне и говорили: «Ааа, Джордж, нам реально приятно, что вы такой ми-ми-мишка для наших детей», а я такой: «Бррр! Нет. Я не хочу этого»."
#GeorgeMichael #ДжорджМайкл
«Девушка, которая заставила мое сердце биться!»
Ее зовут Кэти. Она молода, красива — девушка, которой завидуют миллионы. И она, конечно же, заставила Джорджа Майкла изменить свой путь!
Два года Джордж встречается с Кэти Йонг, нью-йоркским визажистом. Не было сотен девушек — была только она. Это было что-то серьезное, что-то особенное и, самое важное, что-то очень отличающееся от всего, что он знал.
«Я не очень пон…
❤51👍7
Signed Anna Meow
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @all_about_georgemichael. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 16 July 2026 to 6 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,235,517 of 1,548,671entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Всё о Джордже Майкле | All About George Michael” (@all_about_georgemichael), 2,009 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/all_about_georgemichael.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
