4 measurements spanning 21 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 403–404 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
26 Aug 2026, 20:02
404
+1
13 Aug 2026, 05:24
403
-1
6 Aug 2026, 19:33
404
no change
5 Aug 2026, 22:02
404
first reading
Engagement
17 posts held, back to 15 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
18.2%
avg views ÷ 404 subscribers
Avg views / post
73.3
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
11.8%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
3
of 17 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 August 2026
Posts held
17 (15 June 2026 – 2 August 2026)
Views total
220
Reactions total
26
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
6 Aug 2026, 19:33 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
169 reactions across 17 posts, in 21 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
49
29.0%
👏
21
12.4%
😁
16
9.47%
❤🔥
15
8.88%
💯
12
7.10%
🤣
12
7.10%
😭
9
5.33%
❤
8
4.73%
😡
5
2.96%
😢
4
2.37%
🤬
4
2.37%
🤨
3
1.78%
custom 5386399931378440814
2
1.18%
😐
2
1.18%
custom 5010681204551189500
1
0.592%
🔥
1
0.592%
🕊
1
0.592%
😎
1
0.592%
🤔
1
0.592%
🤩
1
0.592%
1 further kind
1
0.592%
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 169reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 15 June 2026 to 2 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
6
across the posts below
Posts paid on
6
of 17 we hold a reading for · 35%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @alirezablog. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 17 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 15 June 2026 to 2 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
✅🐦 مصاحبهای که از ساعاتی پیش با حضور مجید واشقانی در فضای مجازی منتشر شده، مربوط به اوایل مرداد امسال است. این گفتوگو در استانبول، با اجرای نرگس فرخی، همسر بیژن مرتضوی، برای شبکه TV10 ضبط شده است.
انتشار این مصاحبه در شرایطی قابل توجه است که در ایران بسیاری از تولیدکنندگان و مجریان برنامههای گفتوگومحور با محدودیتهای امنیتی، توقف فعالیت و حتی بازداشت مواجه شدهاند، اما واشق…
✅🐦 ضریب نفوذ اینترنت در ایران از ۴.۶ درصد در ابتدای دهه ۸۰ به ۸۵.۳ درصد در سال ۱۴۰۳ رسیده است.
همچنین تعداد اشتراکهای تلفن همراه از کمتر از یک میلیون در سال ۱۳۷۹ به بیش از ۱۵۹ میلیون در سال ۱۴۰۳ افزایش یافته؛ بهطوری که اکنون به ازای هر ۱۰۰ نفر، ۱۷۴ اشتراک فعال وجود دارد. یعنی بهطور متوسط هر ایرانی حدود ۱.۷ سیمکارت فعال دارد و ایران از این نظر در رتبه ۱۲ جهان قرار گرفته است.…
✅🐦 دولت عراق هم در نهایت پذیرفت که نمیتوان در برابر فناوری ایستاد. چند ماه پیش با اینترنت ماهوارهای استارلینک مخالفت میکرد، اما مدتی بعد مجوز فعالیت اسپیسایکس را صادر کرد و از امروز استارلینک بهطور رسمی در عراق فعال شد.
در حالی که کشورهای منطقه یکییکی این فناوری را میپذیرند، جمهوری اسلامی همچنان سیاست مقابله و سرکوب آن را دنبال میکند و همزمان مشغول توسعه و گسترش سیاستها…
✅🐦 جمهوری اسلامی صبح امروز دو نفر از بازداشتشدگان اعتراضات دیماه را اعدام کرد. وقتی پاسخ اعتراض، طناب دار باشد، هدف فقط اعدام دو نفر نیست؛ حکومت میخواهد این پیام را به تمام جامعه منتقل کند: «سکوت کنید تا سرکوب نشوید.»
#ابوالفضل_سپاهی
#امیرحسین_صفری
🔗لینک توییت
✅ 📱 @AlirezaBlog
✅🐦 عادل فردوسیپور سالهاست خار چشم حامیان حکومت است. پس از حذف او از صداوسیما، «فوتبال ۳۶۰» را راهاندازی کرد و با انتشار برنامههایش در وبسایت و یوتیوب، بهویژه در جریان جام جهانی ۲۰۲۶، بار دیگر مخاطبان گستردهای به دست آورد.
او در هفتههای اخیر صریح و بیپرده از عملکرد امیر قلعهنویی و تیم ملی انتقاد کرد. همزمان، از حدود ۱۰ روز پیش حمله به فردوسیپور به پروژه تازه حامیان حک…
✅🐦 هفته گذشته تعدادی از فعالان فضای مجازی، از جمله چند یوتیوبر، به پلیس امنیت احضار شدند؛ یکی از آنها تنها بهدلیل انتشار یک ویدئوی ریاکشن به یک قطعه رپ با برخورد امنیتی مواجه شده است. در مقابل، حامیان حکومت و مهرههای پروپاگاندای جمهوری اسلامی بدون هیچگونه پیگردی، بهراحتی آثاری منتشر میکنند که در آن برای کشته شدن «رهبر محبوب» خود قطعه رپ میسازند و منتشر میکنند.
این دوگانگی…
✅🐦 حامیان جمهوری اسلامی بهتازگی جنوب ایران را به نام خود سند زدهاند و به هر کسی که درباره حمله به جنوب ایران ابراز نگرانی کند یا از مردم این منطقه بگوید، با توهین، تخریب و برچسبزنی پاسخ میدهند.
نه جنوب ایران و نه تمام ایران، ارث پدری حامیان حکومت نیست. وطنپرستی شما به یک سیمکارت سفید خلاصه میشود؛ زیادی ارزان هستید.
🔗لینک توییت
✅ 📱 @AlirezaBlog
✅🐦 برنامه «دیر شناختمت» را میتوان یکی از تازهترین ابزارهای پروپاگاندای جمهوری اسلامی دانست؛ برنامهای که در آن بلاگرهای حامی حکومت دعوت میشوند تا از «اشتباهات گذشته» و تغییر نگاه خود نسبت به سیاستهای حاکمیت سخن بگویند.
یکی از مهمانان این برنامه، مهدیس فریدونی، مشهور به «مهدیس فود» است؛ بلاگری که فعالیتش بر تبلیغ رستورانها در ازای دریافت پول استوار بود؛ تبلیغاتی که از همان اب…
✅🐦 شبها در فستیوالهای حکومتی از خونخواهی، انتقام و نابودی آمریکا و اسرائیل گفتید و برای جنگ هورا کشیدید. حالا چند شبی است که جنوب ایران زیر موج حملات سنگین آمریکا قرار دارد و باز هم این مردم هستند که هزینه جنگ را میدهند، نه شعاردهندگان.
جنگطلب، شما بودید که بیش از ۸۰ شب خواهان حمله و تشدید درگیری بودید. این وضعیت، دستپخت همان سیاست و همان حامیان جمهوری اسلامی است.
🔗لینک توی…
✅🐦 طرفداران جنگ؛ همان مداحانی که روی استیج فستیوالهای شبانه برنامه اجرا میکردند، همزمان با حضور دونالد ترامپ در آنکارا، آرزوی حمله جمهوری اسلامی به خاک ترکیه را داشتند و از «شیرمردی» میگفتند که دکمه شلیک موشک را فشار دهد.
هر روز ادامه حیات جمهوری اسلامی، یعنی یک بحران تازه، یک دشمن تازه و یک تهدید تازه برای ایران و منطقه. ایران زمانی رنگ آرامش را خواهد دید که این تفکر به پای…
✅🐦 این روندی که پژمان راهبر و ورزش۳ در برنامه «برجام» برای تولید دعواهای نمایشی و جنجالهای پیدرپی در پیش گرفتهاند، بیش از آنکه تولید محتوای ورزشی باشد، تلاشی برای وایرال شدن به هر قیمت است.
از قهر جواد خیابانی تا جدلهای تکراری با خداداد عزیزی، همهچیز طوری پیش میرود که حاشیه جای تحلیل را بگیرد. این روند، رسماً توهین به شعور مخاطب است.
🔗لینک توییت
✅ 📱 @AlirezaBlog
✅🐦 بلاگرهای حامی حکومت این روزها مشغول تولید محتوای سفارشی از مراسم تشییع رهبر کشتهشده جمهوری اسلامی هستند؛ محتوایی که ظاهراً هرچه گریه و زاری بیشتر، شعارهای «خونخواهی» و «انتقام» پررنگتر و فضای احساسیتر باشد، شانس بیشتری برای جلب رضایت برگزارکنندگان مراسم دارد.
نکته قابلتوجه اینکه تعداد قابلتوجهی از همین بلاگرها، تنها با دریافت یک «سیمکارت سفید»، در صف تولید محتوای سفار…
😁4🤣3custom 53863999313784408142🤩1
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @alirezablog. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,115,476 of 1,620,105entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
کتاب صوتی @behtarinhayesoti · 92,448 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 17 August 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Alireza Rajaei Arbabi | علیرضا رجایی اربابی” (@alirezablog), 404 subscribers as measured 26 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/alirezablog.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
