Channel
@alinakuptsova87
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
332subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 5 October 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001543720699 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @alinakuptsova87 |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 5 October 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 9 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/alinakuptsova87 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Oct 2026, 05:40 | 332 | no change |
| 5 Oct 2026, 10:22 | 332 | first reading |
9 posts held, back to 11 September 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 9 (11 September 2026 – 26 September 2026) |
| Views total | 1,494 |
| Reactions total | 191 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 5 Oct 2026, 10:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
240 reactions across 9 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 107 | 44.6% | |
| 🔥 | 86 | 35.8% | |
| 👍 | 25 | 10.4% | |
| 🥰 | 14 | 5.83% | |
| 🤗 | 5 | 2.08% | |
| 😍 | 2 | 0.833% | |
| 🤪 | 1 | 0.417% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 240 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 11 September 2026 to 26 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🇷🇺/🇬🇧 Ох, странное и бледное вышло. Не подружились эти карандаши и бумага, пришлось рисовать в большей степени штрихами, а не тушёвкой, как я привыкла. . Well, it’s turned out rather strange and pale. The pencils and paper didn’t get on very well, so I had to draw mostly with strokes rather than hatching, as I’m used to doing. ✏️: Tombow Irojiten 🗒: Potentate, A5, 100 gsm
❤15🔥13🥰2
🇷🇺/🇬🇧 Всё-таки здоровская штука - чернила! Особенно когда они распадаются на разные оттенки. . Ink is a really amazing thing after all! Especially when it separates into different shades. ✒️: чернила Малевичъ «Урсула» 🗒: Fabriano Acquarello, 10.5x14.8 cm, 300 gsm
❤18🔥5👍4🤗3🥰1
🇷🇺/🇬🇧 Ух, классные были выходные, но сил к вечеру воскресенья осталось только на ленивое рисование кустов. В любой непонятной ситуации рисуй кусты! 😁 . Wow, what a cool weekend it was, but by Sunday evening I only had enough energy left for a bit of lazy drawing of some bushes. In any strange situation, just draw bushes! 😁 ✏️: Koh-I-Noor Progresso, 6B 🗒: Malevich Graf’Art, A6, 110 gsm
❤14🔥10👍3🥰3😍1
Photo, posted without a caption
🔥17🥰2
🇷🇺/🇬🇧 Пошла за продуктами, принесла два очень быстрых рисунка. Помойку давно не рисовала, да 😁 . Went to the grocery shop and brought back two very quick sketches. It’s been a while since I last drew a rubbish bin 😁 ✏️: Koh-I-Noor Mondeluz 🗒: Sketchmarker, A6, 140 г/м2
❤16👍4🔥3🤪1😍1
🇷🇺/🇬🇧 Чем сегодня занимается Алина после наведения чистоты в доме? Разведением срача Художественной резьбой по поролону😁 Может, и не очень ровно, зато как удобно: теперь все цвета соуса, сангины и сепии из моих запасов удобно сложены в одну коробочку (которая может при случае стать и пленэрной) 👨🎨 Выкраски тоже держите на случай, если кому нужны. У меня из новых цветов бренда нет только тёмно-серого и серого - не ув…
🔥15❤8👍4🥰1
🇷🇺/🇬🇧 Куст физалиса, запримеченный где-то у гаражей в последний день лета. Люблю эти фонарики, как раз и неоновые цветные карандаши пригодились 🤩 . A physalis bush, which I discovered somewhere near the garages on the last day of summer. I love these little lanterns; the neon coloured pencils came in handy 🤩 🎨: Малевичъ Veroneze ✏️: Малевичъ Graf'Art Pro Color, Малевичъ Graf'Art Color Soft, 🗒: Inkberry, A6, 230 г/м2
❤12🔥9👍3🥰3
🇷🇺/🇬🇧 Вы не поверите, но я снова путешествовала 😁 На этот раз - в Коломну. Тихий, милый и опрятный город. За пределами исторического центра тоже опрятный, да, что особенно радует. Больше фото - в комментариях➡️ . You won’t believe it, but I’ve been travelling again 😁 This time, to Kolomna. A quiet, lovely and tidy town. It’s also tidy outside the historic centre, which is particularly good to see. More photos - in th…
🔥14❤6👍6🥰1
🇷🇺/🇬🇧 Соскучилась по своей чернильной ручке с изогнутым пером. Раньше использовала её только с очень темными чернилами: не хотелось, чтобы пятна заметным образом накладывались друг на друга. А теперь мне нравится этот эффект. . I’ve missed my ink pen with the curved nib. I used to use it only with very dark ink: I didn’t want the strokes to overlap noticeably. But now I like that effect. ✒️: Jacques Herbin writing i…
❤18🤗2👍1🥰1
Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @alinakuptsova87. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Alina Kuptsova” (@alinakuptsova87), 332 subscribers as measured 9 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/alinakuptsova87.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.