Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Дыши с Аленой Алиджик

Channel

Дыши с Аленой Алиджик

@alijik_school

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

8,715subscribers

-47 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001451259772
TypeChannel
Username@alijik_school
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 31 October 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live28 August 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 28 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/alijik_school

Growth

8,7158,7628,738.57 August 2026 — 8,762 subscribers7 August 2026 — 8,762 subscribers10 August 2026 — 8,754 subscribers13 August 2026 — 8,739 subscribers16 August 2026 — 8,737 subscribers19 August 2026 — 8,732 subscribers23 August 2026 — 8,727 subscribers26 August 2026 — 8,720 subscribers28 August 2026 — 8,715 subscribers7 August 202628 August 2026
9 measurements spanning 22 days, net -47. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,708–8,769 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
28 Aug 2026, 22:128,715-5
26 Aug 2026, 04:338,720-7
23 Aug 2026, 09:588,727-5
19 Aug 2026, 13:068,732-5
16 Aug 2026, 17:548,737-2
13 Aug 2026, 03:348,739-15
10 Aug 2026, 07:108,754-8
7 Aug 2026, 09:308,762no change
7 Aug 2026, 09:188,762first reading

Engagement

50 posts held, back to 24 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 28 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
6.69%
avg views ÷ 8,715 subscribers
Avg views / post
583
42 posts measured
Reaction rate
7.98%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
42
of 50 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 41 of 42 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 August 2026
Posts held50 (24 July 202627 August 2026)
Views total24,492
Reactions total1,910
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken28 Aug 2026, 16:25 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
7m 17s
Average length
29s

Measured directly from 15 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

2,127 reactions across 49 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 58.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1,24058.3%
🔥50623.8%
💯1145.36%
🙏1095.12%
😍622.91%
👍341.60%
❤‍🔥190.893%
🥰120.564%
👏80.376%
👌60.282%
😱50.235%
🤝40.188%
🤗30.141%
😁20.094%
🕊10.047%
🗿10.047%
😭10.047%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 49 of the 50 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,127reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 50 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2026 to 27 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
15
across the posts below
Posts paid on
14
of 50 we hold a reading for · 28%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @alijik_school. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 50 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 24 July 2026 to 27 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

27 Aug 2026, 17:30 UTC271 views17 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Я никогда не хотела сделать просто курс с дыхательными практиками Когда я начинала создавать свой метод, мне было важно, чтобы человек не просто выучил несколько техник и повторял их за мной. Мне хотелось научить его понимать себя. Особенно остро эта необходимость появилась во время пандемии. Люди оставались один на один с тревогой, страхом, горем, огромным напряжением и невозможностью даже выйти из дома. Нужно бы

8🔥4🙏4🕊1

27 Aug 2026, 15:49 UTC238 views16 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

10🔥4🙏2

26 Aug 2026, 17:02 UTC340 views24 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Почему я вообще столько говорю о дыхании, когда речь идет о тревоге? На днях у меня сильно залетело видео про тревогу и я поняла, насколько это сейчас больная тема для огромного количества людей. Поэтому давайте на этой неделе немного с ней разберемся. Для начала понаблюдайте за собой, когда сильно нервничаете или пугаетесь. Заметили, что дыхание меняется само – становится чаще, поверхностнее, появляются задержки,

18💯3🔥3

26 Aug 2026, 15:52 UTC294 views18 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Voice message

Как распознать у себя тревогу? 5 признаков Особенно важно послушать тем, кто думает, что у них тревоги нет. Тревога далеко не всегда выглядит как панические атаки, страх или состояние, когда совсем не можешь с собой справиться. Иногда она прекрасно маскируется под ответственность, занятость, желание все контролировать и привычку всегда быть при деле. В этом подкасте дала 5 признаков тревоги, которые легко годами з

11🔥5💯2

26 Aug 2026, 15:09 UTC306 views20 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

А вы вообще умеете замечать свое состояние ДО того, как вас уже накрыло? Это одна из вещей, которым меня научило дыхание. Мы привыкли воспринимать его очень примитивно. Ну дышим и дышим, что тут интересного. А для меня дыхание – это в первую очередь способ понимать, что сейчас происходит со мной и влиять на это. Потому что тело, эмоции и дыхание постоянно связаны между собой. Вы же не дышите одинаково, когда спите

15🔥4🙏1

25 Aug 2026, 16:42 UTC400 views43 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Если вам не нравится место, где вы живете, работа, отношения, собственное состояние, но вы продолжаете каждый день заставлять себя – огромное количество энергии уходит просто на то, чтобы выдерживать свою жизнь А потом мы удивляемся, почему ничего не хочется. Почему нет сил на путешествия, работу, обучение, спорт, встречи. Почему мечты есть, а энергии на них нет. Я очень хорошо знаю это состояние, потому что столкн

33❤‍🔥6😍3🥰1

25 Aug 2026, 14:36 UTC356 views61 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Video

Я хочу посвятить этот пост ЖЕНЩИНАМ Смелым, сильным, ранимым, отдающим свои жизни и тела, неустанно заботящимся, вечно переживающим за каждую морщинку и каждый грамм на весах, мудрым, смешным, верящим, одиноким, молчащим, терпеливым, таким разным, таким прекрасным. Женщина, читающая этот пост, я, Алёна Алиджик из Новосибирска, верю в тебя и я с тобой. Я знаю, что часто ты боишься. И из-за этого еще больше устаешь.

39🔥12😍10

25 Aug 2026, 13:14 UTC379 views28 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Voice message

А что, если в 50 жизнь не заканчивается, а только становится интереснее? Записала подкаст о том, как я сегодня выбираю свою жизнь. Не терпеть там, где уходит весь ресурс. Не ждать подходящего возраста и момента. Не позволять страху решать, куда мне ехать, что пробовать и сколько вообще хотеть от этой жизни. Рассказала про Бали, взросление сына, мои обеты служить людям, путешествия и то, почему в 50 я совершенно не

17🔥7👍4

24 Aug 2026, 16:49 UTC415 views25 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

А вы вообще помните себя полными сил? Я сейчас много думаю про энергию. Наверное, потому что последние полтора месяца у меня были такими, что раньше я бы сама себе сказала – Алена, ты сумасшедшая🤣 Перелеты, переезды, ретриты, учеба по ночам, Бали, байк, восстановление спины, работа. А мне ведь почти 51. При этом я смотрю на женщин гораздо моложе меня и вижу, как многие уже живут на последнем заряде. Да я и сама ко

🔥193💯3

24 Aug 2026, 15:14 UTC425 views35 reactions1 Starread 28 August 2026
Photo

Прошло полтора месяца, как я уехала из дома Честно – мне было тревожно оставлять сына так надолго одного, тем более там, где сирены и воздушная опасность уже 9 месяцев не прекращаются. Но я дышала на баланс и все прошло хорошо. Я не знала что меня ждет, что у меня здесь получится, но дыхание давало мне силы, стойкость и веру в себя. Мой путь начался через Сочи, Минеральные Воды, затем я 5 дней исследовала Узбекист

25👏5🔥5

Showing the 12 most recent of 50 posts we hold for @alijik_school. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

4 Aug 2026, 12:46 UTCAnonymous Poll98 voters

Какие видео вам были бы интересны? Не более 3-х вариантов.

  1. Длинные видео на разные темы17%
  2. Медиации49%
  3. Комплексы дыхательных практик94%
  4. Подкасты31%
  5. Интервью4%
  6. Видео с ответами на ваши вопросы22%
  7. Влоги7%

The shares total 224%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 50 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2026 to 27 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 973,683 of 1,624,904entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Мила Левчук о любви
@milalevchuk · 49,118
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 26 August 2026
Мария Коновалова - Всё о женском здоровье
@dockonovalovamarija · 62,690
Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 21 August 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Дыши с Аленой Алиджик” (@alijik_school), 8,715 subscribers as measured 28 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/alijik_school.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.