Channel
@alii_esfandiariii
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
6,813subscribers
-1,189 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001281132954 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @alii_esfandiariii |
| Created | Between 1 April 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 15 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/alii_esfandiariii |
Parenting & family — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 52% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Sept 2026, 14:40 | 6,813 | -161 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 20:17 | 6,974 | -128 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 22:18 | 7,102 | -331 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 20:58 | 7,433 | -175 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 09:24 | 7,608 | -31 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 01:43 | 7,639 | -43 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 00:14 | 7,682 | -30 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 19:35 | 7,712 | -60 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 06:55 | 7,772 | -48 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 14:08 | 7,820 | -62 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 16:43 | 7,882 | -54 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 23:31 | 7,936 | -63 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 14:01 | 7,999 | -3 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 12:31 | 8,002 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 12:29 | 8,002 | first reading |
106 posts held, back to 1 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 106 (1 August 2026 – 28 August 2026) |
| Views total | 4,830 |
| Reactions total | 77 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 28 Aug 2026, 21:04 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
977 reactions across 106 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 70.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 693 | 70.9% | |
| 🤝 | 140 | 14.3% | |
| 💔 | 48 | 4.91% | |
| ✍ | 35 | 3.58% | |
| 🗿 | 23 | 2.35% | |
| 🐳 | 16 | 1.64% | |
| 👀 | 15 | 1.54% | |
| 🎄 | 7 | 0.716% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 106 of the 106 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 977 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 106 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
بچهای که رفتار عجیبی میکند، لزوماً نیاز به اصلاح شدن ندارد. ممکن است یک روز ادای حیوانات را دربیاورد، فقط خوراکیهای یک رنگ را بخواهد یا برای خودش یک دوست خیالی بسازد. واکنش خیلی از ما این است که سریع بگوییم: «این کارها چیه؟ طبیعی رفتار کن!» اما کودک هنوز در حال امتحان کردن دنیاست؛ با بازی، خیالپردازی و رفتارهای عجیب میفهمد چه چیزی واقعی است، چه چیزی ممکن است و خودش چه کسی است. اگر برای هر رفتار متفاوتی، فورا…
❤3🐳1
گاهی درست وقتی داریم بهتر میشویم، احساس میکنیم یک جای کار میلنگد. مثلاً شغلی را عوض کردهایم، از یک رابطه بیرون آمدهایم یا بعضی عادتهای قدیمیمان را کنار گذاشتهایم؛ اما بهجای آرامش، احساس غربت میکنیم. دلیلش ساده است: مغز ما «آشنا بودن» را با «امن بودن» اشتباه میگیرد. برای همین حتی یک وضعیت بدِ آشنا، ممکن است از یک وضعیت بهترِ ناآشنا، راحتتر به نظر برسد. اینجاست که خیلیها عقبنشینی میکنند و دوباره به ه…
❤5
چند روز پیش با رانندهی جوانی در اسنپ همکلام شدم موضوع صحبتم شغل و کار برای جوانان بود به پیشنهاد خودش صحبتم رو ضبط کردم و منتشر میکنم، امیدوارم برای جوانتر ها مفید باشد. دوستدار شما - شهاب موسوی @investing_art
❤5
داشتم به این فکر میکردم، بعد از مرگ، اگه یکی پیدا شه ازم بپرسه، در طول زندگیای که کردی، از چی لذت بردی؟ احتمالاً میگم: رفتم موسیقی گوش دادم برگشتم #علی_اسفندیاری
❤7🤝2🗿1
انسان از آن چیزی که بسیار دوست میدارد، خود را جدا میسازد. در اوج خواستن، نمیخواهد. در اوج تمنا، نمیخواهد. دوست میدارد اما در عین حال میخواهد که متنفر باشد. امیدوار است اما امیدوار است که امیدوار نباشد. #منهای_اقتصاد
❤6
ارزش هر هنری در اینه که به ذات موسیقی نزدیک بشه... ━━━━━━◉────── ↻ㅤ ◁ㅤ ㅤ❚❚ㅤ ㅤ▷ㅤㅤ ⇆
❤3
هر حال بدی قرار نیست فوراً خوب شود. وقتی عصبانی، مضطرب یا ناامید میشویم، معمولاً اولین واکنشمان این است که حواسمان را پرت کنیم، مثبت فکر کنیم یا احساسمان را نادیده بگیریم. چون یاد گرفتهایم احساسات ناخوشایند یعنی یک جای کار میلنگد. اما بعضی احساسات بیشتر از اینکه «مشکل» باشند، «پیام» هستند؛ خشم میتواند از یک مرز ردشده خبر بدهد، اضطراب از یک نگرانی و ناامیدی از چیزی که برایمان مهم بوده. اگر هر بار سریع صدایشان …
❤4
یکی از سختترین چیزها برای مغز ما، «نمیدونم» است. وقتی نمیدانیم نتیجه یک تصمیم، رابطه، کار یا سرمایهگذاری چه میشود، ذهن شروع میکند به ساختن بدترین سناریوها؛ انگار اگر از قبل همهی اتفاقات بد را تصور کنیم، کمتر غافلگیر میشویم. اما این فکر کردنِ بیپایان، آینده را قابلکنترل نمیکند؛ فقط انرژی امروزمان را میگیرد. واقعیت این است که؛ بخش بزرگی از زندگی همیشه نامعلوم میماند و قرار نیست برای همهچیز جواب داشته ب…
❤7
خیلی وقتها فرق آدم باتجربه با تازهکار این نیست که جوابهای بیشتری بلده؛ اینه که وقتی هیچ جواب آمادهای وجود نداره، بهتر فکر میکنه. دنیای واقعی شبیه مسئلههای کتاب درسی نیست که صورت سؤال دقیق و پاسخ مشخص داشته باشن. یک مدیر، پزشک، معمار یا مشاور، مدام با موقعیتهایی روبهرو میشن که مبهم، تازه و غیرقابلپیشبینیاند. اینجا فقط دانستنِ فرمولها کافی نیست؛ باید وسط عمل، نتیجه کار رو ببینی، برداشتت رو اصلاح کنی و را…
❤9
راستش اگه بخوام صادقانه بگم، توی دوران رونق بازار نباید خیلی دنبال تحلیل بود. فرض کن یه تارگت تو ذهنت داری که بر اساس تجربه فکر میکنی بازار خودش رو به اون نقطه میرسونه. هر جا این حرف رو بزنی، اولین چیزی که ازت میپرسن اینه: «تحلیلت چیه؟» ولی نکته اینجاست که در دوران شیدایی بورس، تقریباً هر تحلیل بنیادی و اقتصادیای فیلد میشه. نمیتونی رشد بازار رو با پیشبینی سود، P/E فوروارد و این مدل محاسبات توجیه کنی. توی دو…
🤝4
هر کاری که در یک شرکت انجام میشه، لزوماً کار مفیدی نیست؛ حتی اگر سالهاست همه انجامش میدن. ممکنه هر هفته گزارشی تهیه بشه که هیچکس ازش استفاده نمیکنه، اما چون «همیشه همینطور بوده» همچنان ادامه پیدا کنه. کاری هستند که زمانی دلیلی برای انجامش وجود داشته، ولی دلیلش از بین رفته و خودِ کار باقی مونده. نکته جالب اینه که تشخیص این کارها همیشه آسون نیست. گاهی یک کارمند بیکار خیلی زود دیده میشه، اما یک واحد شلوغ میتو…
❤1
ایشان حتی ورود و خروج را هم بلد نیست باید افسوس خورد به حال مردمی که هر پکیج فروشی را کارشناس میداند @javadfallahian_official☑️
🤝3❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 106 posts we hold for @alii_esfandiariii. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
کدوم مورد بیشتر از چیزی که فکر میکنیم روی آیندهمون اثر میذاره؟
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 106 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 28 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“علی اسفندیاری | Ali Esfandiari” (@alii_esfandiariii), 6,813 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/alii_esfandiariii.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.