Channel
@algolife
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
1,574subscribers
+8 since we began measuring on 13 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001031187377 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @algolife |
| Created | Between 1 February 2016 and 31 May 2016 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 13 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 28 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 13 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 28 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/algolife |
Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 17 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 28 Sept 2026, 10:38 | 1,574 | +8 |
| 18 Sept 2026, 23:36 | 1,566 | -1 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 13:37 | 1,567 | +1 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 21:41 | 1,566 | -10 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 00:55 | 1,576 | -8 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 05:33 | 1,584 | +3 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 15:06 | 1,581 | +5 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 12:05 | 1,576 | +3 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 13:23 | 1,573 | +2 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 14:22 | 1,571 | +3 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 19:56 | 1,568 | +3 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 09:45 | 1,565 | -1 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 21:18 | 1,566 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 13 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
10 reactions across 8 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 90.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 9 | 90.0% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 10.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 10 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 13 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🔴الفرق بين الخطوبة والعقد والبناء والدخول ومن تجاوز فقد تعدي حدود الله 🟢 ✍️السلام عليكم و رحمة الله و بركاته ،كيف أموركم شيخنا؟ 🔴شيخنا أحسن الله إليكم ما حكم الكلام العادي بلا تجاوز بين الخاطب و المخطوبة بدون خلوة،و ما هي حدود التجاوز في الكلام؟ جزاكم الله خيرا.
Photo, posted without a caption
Photo, posted without a caption
Photo, posted without a caption
السلام عليكم و رحمة الله. 🔴شيخنا الكريم هل يجوز العمل بالأجرة من باب كسب الرزق للعيش ، في حفر قبور الكفار والبناء عليها وتنظيفها ووضع الصليب عليها⁉️ ؟
السلام عليكم ورحمة الله وبركاته حياكم الله شيخنا وحفظكم 🔴شيخنا هل يجوز للنساء نشر صور وجوه الرجال الأموات والأحياء والنظر إليها؟ بارك الله فيكم وحفظكم
📚✍️روى أبو داود وأحمد وصححه الحاكم وأقره الذهبي عن عبد الله بن عمر رضي الله عنه يقول: كُنَّا قُعُودًا عِنْدَ رَسُولِ اللَّهِ فَذَكَرَ الْفِتَنَ فَأَكْثَرَ فِي ذِكْرِهَا حَتَّى ذَكَرَ فِتْنَةَ الْأَحْلَاسِ فَقَالَ قَائِلٌ يَا رَسُولَ اللَّهِ وَمَا فِتْنَةُ الْأَحْلَاسِ قَالَ هِيَ هَرَبٌ وَحَرْبٌ ثُمَّ فِتْنَةُ السَّرَّاءِ دَخَنُهَا مِنْ تَحْتِ قَدَمَيْ رَجُلٍ مِنْ أَهْلِ بَيْتِي يَزْعُمُ أَنَّهُ مِنِّي وَلَيْسَ مِنِّ…
❤1
🔴الوقفة التاسعة عشر مع سورة لقمان 🟢فتنة الأحلاس والسراء والدهيماء 🔴
🔴الفرق بين سب الصحابة وتكفيرهم⁉️ سلام عليكم ورحمة الله وبركاته حياكم الله يا شيخنا الفاضل وأحسن الله إليكم وبارك فيكم ونسأل الله أن يوفقكم ويسددكم عندي سؤال: هل الصحيح أن من سب و شتم الصحابة و لا سيما العشرة المبشرين بالجنة فإنه يكفر؟ وهل مجرد تكفير الصحابة يُعد من السب والشتم أم أن بينهما فرقا؟ وإذا كان تكفير الصحابة يوجب الكفر فلماذا اختلف العلماء في الحكم على الخوارج؟ فإن الخوارج كفروا بعض الصحابة كعلي بن أبي طال…
📕✍️*﴿قَالَ إِنِّي أُشْهِدُ اللَّهَ وَاشْهَدُوا أَنِّي بَرِيءٌ مِّمَّا تُشْرِكُونَ﴾* 🔴✍️تأمل هذا التجرد العجيب من حظ النفس؛ لقد قالوا له: *﴿إِن نَّقُولُ إِلَّا اعْتَرَاكَ بَعْضُ آلِهَتِنَا بِسُوءٍ﴾*، واتهموه بالجنون، لكنه لم يجعل همَّه أن يبرئ نفسه من تهمتهم، ولا أن يدخل معهم في معركة شخصية؛ لأن له همًّا أكبر: أن يبرئ عقيدته، وأن يبلغ الحق، وأن ينقذ القوم من الضلال، فتبرأ من عقيدتهم الخربة وضلالهم الواضح. 📚✍️وهكذا ا…
❤1
📕﴿قَالَ سَآوِي إِلَىٰ جَبَلٍ يَعْصِمُنِي مِنَ الْمَاءِ﴾ ✍️تأمل هذا التصور المادي للنجاة؛ فابن نوح لم يرَ إلا الجبل، وارتفاعه، والماء، وحدود ما يراه بعينه، فظن أن هذه الأسباب تملك أن تعصمه من قدر الله. 👈وهذه ليست قصةً قديمة فحسب، بل نمط تفكير يتكرر كلما غاب عن الإنسان تعظيم الله؛ فينظر إلى الأسباب المادية وحدها، ويحسب أن الكون يتحرك بها استقلالًا عن تدبير الله. 🔴فالسارق مثلًا لا يفكر إلا بهذه الطريقة: كيف أغطي الكا…
❤1
📕✍️دَفعُ التكفير عن علماء المسلمين وإن أخطئوا هو من أحقِّ الأغراض الشرعية. ✍️🖋️ قال شيخ الإسلام ابن تيمية -رحمه الله -: فإنَّ تسليط الجُهَّال على تَكفير علماء المسلمين مِن أعظَم المنكرات، وإنما أصلُ هذا مِن الخوارج والروافض الذين يُكفّرون أئمة المسلمين؛ لِما يَعتقدون أنهم أخطئوا فيه مِن الدين ، 📚✍️وقد اتفق أهل السُّنة والجماعة على أن علماء المسلمين لا يَجوز تَكفيرهم بمجرد الخطأ المحض؛ بل كل أحدٍ يُؤخذ مِن قوله و يُ…
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @algolife. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“قناة الشيخ عبدالله الغليفي رحمه الله” (@algolife), 1,574 subscribers as measured 28 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/algolife.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.