Channel
@algolife
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,565subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 13 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001031187377 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @algolife |
| Created | Between 1 January 2016 and 30 September 2016— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 13 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/algolife |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 09:45 | 1,565 | -1 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 21:18 | 1,566 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 8 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (30 July 2026 – 13 August 2026) |
| Views total | 3,802 |
| Reactions total | 10 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 13 Aug 2026, 21:18 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
10 reactions across 8 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 90.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 9 | 90.0% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 10.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 10reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 13 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🔴الفرق بين الخطوبة والعقد والبناء والدخول ومن تجاوز فقد تعدي حدود الله 🟢 ✍️السلام عليكم و رحمة الله و بركاته ،كيف أموركم شيخنا؟ 🔴شيخنا أحسن الله إليكم ما حكم الكلام العادي بلا تجاوز بين الخاطب و المخطوبة بدون خلوة،و ما هي حدود التجاوز في الكلام؟ جزاكم الله خيرا.
Photo, posted without a caption
Photo, posted without a caption
Photo, posted without a caption
السلام عليكم و رحمة الله. 🔴شيخنا الكريم هل يجوز العمل بالأجرة من باب كسب الرزق للعيش ، في حفر قبور الكفار والبناء عليها وتنظيفها ووضع الصليب عليها⁉️ ؟
السلام عليكم ورحمة الله وبركاته حياكم الله شيخنا وحفظكم 🔴شيخنا هل يجوز للنساء نشر صور وجوه الرجال الأموات والأحياء والنظر إليها؟ بارك الله فيكم وحفظكم
📚✍️روى أبو داود وأحمد وصححه الحاكم وأقره الذهبي عن عبد الله بن عمر رضي الله عنه يقول: كُنَّا قُعُودًا عِنْدَ رَسُولِ اللَّهِ فَذَكَرَ الْفِتَنَ فَأَكْثَرَ فِي ذِكْرِهَا حَتَّى ذَكَرَ فِتْنَةَ الْأَحْلَاسِ فَقَالَ قَائِلٌ يَا رَسُولَ اللَّهِ وَمَا فِتْنَةُ الْأَحْلَاسِ قَالَ هِيَ هَرَبٌ وَحَرْبٌ ثُمَّ فِتْنَةُ السَّرَّاءِ دَخَنُهَا مِنْ تَحْتِ قَدَمَيْ رَجُلٍ مِنْ أَهْلِ بَيْتِي يَزْعُمُ أَنَّهُ مِنِّي وَلَيْسَ مِنِّ…
❤1
🔴الوقفة التاسعة عشر مع سورة لقمان 🟢فتنة الأحلاس والسراء والدهيماء 🔴
🔴الفرق بين سب الصحابة وتكفيرهم⁉️ سلام عليكم ورحمة الله وبركاته حياكم الله يا شيخنا الفاضل وأحسن الله إليكم وبارك فيكم ونسأل الله أن يوفقكم ويسددكم عندي سؤال: هل الصحيح أن من سب و شتم الصحابة و لا سيما العشرة المبشرين بالجنة فإنه يكفر؟ وهل مجرد تكفير الصحابة يُعد من السب والشتم أم أن بينهما فرقا؟ وإذا كان تكفير الصحابة يوجب الكفر فلماذا اختلف العلماء في الحكم على الخوارج؟ فإن الخوارج كفروا بعض الصحابة كعلي بن أبي طال…
📕✍️*﴿قَالَ إِنِّي أُشْهِدُ اللَّهَ وَاشْهَدُوا أَنِّي بَرِيءٌ مِّمَّا تُشْرِكُونَ﴾* 🔴✍️تأمل هذا التجرد العجيب من حظ النفس؛ لقد قالوا له: *﴿إِن نَّقُولُ إِلَّا اعْتَرَاكَ بَعْضُ آلِهَتِنَا بِسُوءٍ﴾*، واتهموه بالجنون، لكنه لم يجعل همَّه أن يبرئ نفسه من تهمتهم، ولا أن يدخل معهم في معركة شخصية؛ لأن له همًّا أكبر: أن يبرئ عقيدته، وأن يبلغ الحق، وأن ينقذ القوم من الضلال، فتبرأ من عقيدتهم الخربة وضلالهم الواضح. 📚✍️وهكذا ا…
❤1
📕﴿قَالَ سَآوِي إِلَىٰ جَبَلٍ يَعْصِمُنِي مِنَ الْمَاءِ﴾ ✍️تأمل هذا التصور المادي للنجاة؛ فابن نوح لم يرَ إلا الجبل، وارتفاعه، والماء، وحدود ما يراه بعينه، فظن أن هذه الأسباب تملك أن تعصمه من قدر الله. 👈وهذه ليست قصةً قديمة فحسب، بل نمط تفكير يتكرر كلما غاب عن الإنسان تعظيم الله؛ فينظر إلى الأسباب المادية وحدها، ويحسب أن الكون يتحرك بها استقلالًا عن تدبير الله. 🔴فالسارق مثلًا لا يفكر إلا بهذه الطريقة: كيف أغطي الكا…
❤1
📕✍️دَفعُ التكفير عن علماء المسلمين وإن أخطئوا هو من أحقِّ الأغراض الشرعية. ✍️🖋️ قال شيخ الإسلام ابن تيمية -رحمه الله -: فإنَّ تسليط الجُهَّال على تَكفير علماء المسلمين مِن أعظَم المنكرات، وإنما أصلُ هذا مِن الخوارج والروافض الذين يُكفّرون أئمة المسلمين؛ لِما يَعتقدون أنهم أخطئوا فيه مِن الدين ، 📚✍️وقد اتفق أهل السُّنة والجماعة على أن علماء المسلمين لا يَجوز تَكفيرهم بمجرد الخطأ المحض؛ بل كل أحدٍ يُؤخذ مِن قوله و يُ…
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @algolife. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 836,259 of 1,481,243entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“قناة الشيخ عبدالله الغليفي رحمه الله” (@algolife), 1,565 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/algolife.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.