Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for قناة الدورات التأصيلية

Channel

قناة الدورات التأصيلية

@algohany12

On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

10,965subscribers

-137 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001013972567
TypeChannel
Username@algohany12
Created22 April 2016 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live25 September 2026
Measurements held33
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 25 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/algohany12

Topic

Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (1 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@NewsDawrat/335516 May 2026, 02:55 UTC@algohany12/2717 · this entry16 May 2026, 02:55 UTC1.00under a minute
Every channel this entry shares post bodies with
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@NewsDawrat7 (7/7 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minutethis entry (4–3)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 0 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 12 comparable posts for this entry, running 30 January 2026 to 6 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Across the whole group of 2, the earliest publisher we hold is @NewsDawrat. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the key clone_mutual, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

10,96511,10211,033.57 August 2026 — 11,102 subscribers8 August 2026 — 11,100 subscribers9 August 2026 — 11,096 subscribers10 August 2026 — 11,092 subscribers11 August 2026 — 11,091 subscribers12 August 2026 — 11,084 subscribers13 August 2026 — 11,083 subscribers15 August 2026 — 11,086 subscribers17 August 2026 — 11,081 subscribers18 August 2026 — 11,073 subscribers19 August 2026 — 11,070 subscribers20 August 2026 — 11,068 subscribers21 August 2026 — 11,065 subscribers22 August 2026 — 11,057 subscribers24 August 2026 — 11,046 subscribers25 August 2026 — 11,041 subscribers26 August 2026 — 11,037 subscribers27 August 2026 — 11,035 subscribers28 August 2026 — 11,032 subscribers29 August 2026 — 11,028 subscribers30 August 2026 — 11,029 subscribers31 August 2026 — 11,021 subscribers1 September 2026 — 11,034 subscribers2 September 2026 — 11,031 subscribers3 September 2026 — 11,030 subscribers5 September 2026 — 11,018 subscribers8 September 2026 — 11,011 subscribers11 September 2026 — 11,004 subscribers13 September 2026 — 10,993 subscribers14 September 2026 — 10,985 subscribers16 September 2026 — 10,980 subscribers19 September 2026 — 10,975 subscribers25 September 2026 — 10,965 subscribers7 August 202625 September 2026
33 measurements spanning 49 days, net -137. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 10,944–11,123 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 33
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
25 Sept 2026, 22:0210,965-10
19 Sept 2026, 03:4210,975-5
16 Sept 2026, 21:0110,980-5
14 Sept 2026, 23:4110,985-8
13 Sept 2026, 08:0110,993-11
11 Sept 2026, 09:1811,004-7
8 Sept 2026, 14:5711,011-7
5 Sept 2026, 10:3811,018-12
3 Sept 2026, 15:4011,030-1
2 Sept 2026, 07:5811,031-3
1 Sept 2026, 06:5811,034+13
31 Aug 2026, 09:3211,021-8
30 Aug 2026, 07:4711,029+1
29 Aug 2026, 05:5311,028-4
28 Aug 2026, 06:4311,032-3
27 Aug 2026, 04:5711,035-2
26 Aug 2026, 07:5811,037-4
25 Aug 2026, 05:3611,041-5
24 Aug 2026, 07:0911,046-11
22 Aug 2026, 17:3211,057first reading

Engagement

26 posts held, back to 28 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 39 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 26 posts for this entry, the most recent from 23 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
5m 00s
Average length
5m 00s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

6 reactions across 5 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 66.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍466.7%
👎233.3%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 26 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 26 most recent posts we hold, published 28 January 2026 to 23 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

23 Aug 2026, 19:10 UTC134 viewsread 3 September 2026

🎁 صدقة جارية لك ولمن تحب .. هل تريد أن تجعل لك صدقة جارية، ويكون لك من أجرها نصيب كلما انتفع بها أحد؟ هذه الدورة فرصة طيبة لمن أراد أن يعمل صدقة جارية عن نفسه، أو عن أبيه وأمه، أو عن أولاده، وأهله، وأحبته، الأحياء منهم والأموات. والدورة تصلح لجميع عموم المسلمين: رجالا ونساء، كبارا وصغارا، شبابا وفتيات. فشارك في الدورة، واحتسب أجرك عند الله، وانشرها بين الناس؛ فالدال على الخير كفاعله. واجعل نيتك عند الاشتراك…

20 Aug 2026, 07:04 UTC239 viewsread 3 September 2026
Forwarded from @khaledalgohany

السلام عليكم ورحمة الله وبركاته اليوم سأبدأ دورة جديدة في شرح المواريث .. الموعد: الخميس من كل أسبوع الساعة الخامسة والنصف بتوقيت مكة. على قناة الجهني العلمية: https://t.me/khaledalgohany

17 Aug 2026, 04:05 UTC292 viewsread 3 September 2026
Forwarded from @khaledalgohany

شاركوا رابط قراءة صحيح البخاري بالسند المتصل عبر البث المباشر https://t.me/khaledalgohany?livestream

13 Aug 2026, 04:49 UTC338 viewsread 3 September 2026
Forwarded from @Attaacademy1Photo

📻 دورة ميسرة في العقيدة للمبتدئين 🧰 هل تبحث عن بداية ميسرة ومنهجية في علم العقيدة؟ 🗂 يسر أكاديمية عطاء أن تعلن عن إقامة: 📚 الدورة الميسرة في العقيدة للمبتدئين خلال سبعة أيام فقط، تُدرس فيها ثلاثة كتب مختارة، تجمع أهم أصول العقيدة بأسلوب ميسر يناسب المبتدئين: ١️⃣- التعليقات المرضية على المنظومة اللامية. ٢️⃣- شرح الأصل الجامع لعبادة الله وحده. ٣️⃣- القول السديدة شرح تفسير كلمة التوحيد. 📅 تبدأ الدورة: الأحد ا…

10 Aug 2026, 03:13 UTC340 views2 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Forwarded from @khaledalgohany

🔴 باقي دقائق قليلة! 📖 أول مجلس من مجالس قراءة صحيح الإمام البخاري رحمه الله.. بعد قليل نبدأ بإذن الله، فتهيؤوا لهذا المجلس المبارك، وكونوا معنا في قراءة كتاب من أصح كتب السنة. 📲 عبر قناة الجهني العلمية في تليجرام https://t.me/khaledalgohany ⏰ نلتقي بعد قليل.. لا تفوتوا المجلس، واغتنموا شرف سماع صحيح الإمام البخاري. 🌿

👍2

9 Aug 2026, 17:19 UTC326 viewsread 3 September 2026
Forwarded from @khaledalgohanyPhoto

🎁 إن شاء الله 🗓 سأبدأ غدا الاثنين الموافق ٢٧ صفر ١٤٤٨ هـ .. 📻 الساعة الخامسة والنصف مساء بتوقيت مصر .. 🎙 في شرح معتقد الإمام الشافعي رحمه الله 📖 من كتاب: الجوهر النفيس في شرح معتقد الإمام أبي عبدالله محمد بن إدريس الشافعي رحمه الله. 📻 عبر البث المباشر لقناة #الجهني_العلمية في تليجرام: https://t.me/khaledalgohany

6 Aug 2026, 13:21 UTC304 viewsread 3 September 2026
Forwarded from @algohany6File

📻 مما جاء في فضل طلب العلم وتعلمه .. د. خالد الجهني. 📮 للاشتراك في دورة علوم الآلة: https://t.me/algohany6/18

6 Aug 2026, 09:46 UTC312 viewsread 3 September 2026
Forwarded from @algohany6

🧰 دورة علوم الآلة تبدأ غدا الجمعة إن شاء الله.. نهيب بجميع المشاركين والمشاركات نشر إعلان "دورة علوم الآلة" عسى الله أن يجعلنا جميعا مع النبين والصديقين والشهداء وحسن أولئك رفيقا. الدورة عبر قناة دورة علوم الآلة في تليجرام: https://t.me/algohany6/18 "الدال على الخير له مثل أجر فاعله".

3 Aug 2026, 17:20 UTC313 viewsread 3 September 2026
Forwarded from @khaledalgohanyPhoto

بشرى سارة لطلاب العلم ومحبي سنة النبي ﷺ هل تتطلع إلى نيل شرف الاتصال بسند صحيح الإمام البخاري؟ ها هي الفرصة بين يديك... 📻 يسر قناة الجهني العلمية أن تعلن عن: 📖 دورة سماع صحيح الإمام البخاري بالسند المتصل مجالس مباركة يُقرأ فيها صحيح الإمام البخاري كاملًا بالسند المتصل، إحياءً لسنة الإسناد، واقتداءً بأئمة الحديث في حفظ السنة ونقلها. 🗓 موعد الدورة: كل يوم اثنين .. تبدأ يوم الاثنين القادم ٢٧ صفر ١٤٤٨ هـ . ⏰ م…

3 Aug 2026, 03:05 UTC283 viewsread 3 September 2026
Forwarded from @algohany6Photo

🧰 كونوا معنا في دورة علوم الآلة .. https://t.me/algohany6 📻 فإن سماع العلم عبادة ..

2 Aug 2026, 17:30 UTC310 viewsread 3 September 2026
Forwarded from @khaledalgohany

قريبا سنقرأ صحيح البخاري بالسند المتصل على قناة #الجهني_العلمية https://t.me/khaledalgohany انتظرونا

2 Aug 2026, 02:43 UTC322 viewsread 3 September 2026
Forwarded from @khaledalgohany

🧰 من فاتته الدورة اليتيمة لا تفوته دورة علوم الآلة .. https://t.me/algohany6

Showing the 12 most recent of 26 posts we hold for @algohany12. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

مؤلفات د. خالد الجهني
@algohany10101 · 24,298
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 16 September 2026
موقع الطريق المضيء (مذكرات،مراجعات إمتحانات،)
@the_lightway · 20,907
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 25 September 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“قناة الدورات التأصيلية” (@algohany12), 10,965 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/algohany12.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.