Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 1 October 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
3 measurements spanning 45 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 22–23 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
25 Sept 2026, 16:19
22
-1
11 Aug 2026, 19:37
23
no change
11 Aug 2026, 13:18
23
first reading
Engagement
13 posts held, back to 29 October 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 13 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 December 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
46s
Average length
23s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
42 reactions across 12 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 54.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
23
54.8%
👍
7
16.7%
🔥
7
16.7%
❤🔥
4
9.52%
👀
1
2.38%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 42 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 29 October 2025 to 3 December 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Кто хочет попробовать попрактиковаться?) И поиспользовать слова, что я вам кидала.
✨ Вот такие картинки я описывала сегодня на уроке. Сочиняла историю про Anna-María (la mujer) и Alejandro (el hombre).
Начало было примерно такое:
Anna-María es de Argentina. Es delincuente. Es bonita y muy segura de sí misma. Pero su trabajo es muy peligroso, por eso tiene una pistola para defenderse. Además, sabe que la policía pu…
Делюсь новой тренировкой 😉
Это слова из последнего Quizlet. Сначала я составила с ними предложения, а потом перевела в упражнение.
🙂Такие тренировки нам с вами очень нужны, иначе лексика будет забываться мгновенно.
Прежде, чем выполнять, пройдите их в Quizlet, чтобы узнать перевод (если еще этого не сделали). А дальше внимательно читайте предложение и вставляйте слово по смыслу.
И рассказывайте как вам :) У меня …
Создала испанский YouTube и выложила первое видео 😱
За последние дни я запомнила очень сложные для себя слова буквально по щелчку пальцев 🫰
Я и раньше умела это делать — как преподаватель английского я знаю лексический подход досконально, а в испанском он тоже существует и прекрасно работает.
Но мне все время не хватало времени, дисциплины и т. д. А с этим каналом я чувствую какое-то второе дыхание, что ли. Прямо …
Слова, которые учу к среде. Делюсь с вами -> Quizlet
Если будет время на этой неделе, сделаю нам какое-нибудь задание попрактиковать их вместе и пообщаться в комментариях.
Поставьте реакции, кому интересна совместная практика, чтобы я знала. Мне очень важно — это одна из главных целей на этот канал 🙂
Как я запоминаю слова, которые никак не хотят запоминаться
Начнём с моего первого проблемного слова: comprobar - проверять.
Первая половина слова похожа на COMPRar - покупать. А вторая PROBAR - проверять. А еще есть PROBARse - это примерять одежду.
Моя ассоциация:
прежде, чем КУПИТЬ 🛍️ = COMPRar
мы одежду ПРИМЕРЯЕМ 👖 = PROBARse
чтобы ПРОВЕРИТЬ ✅, подойдет ли она нам
COMPRar+ PROBARse = COMPROBAR - проверять
Н…
В общем, есть классная схема, как запоминать очень сложные для нас слова. Я и ученикам про неё рассказываю, и сама раньше часто её в английском использовала (сейчас уже реже, потому что запоминать английский мой мозг натренирован в разы лучше, чем испанский).
Я использовала эту схему в конце прошлой недели для 4-х слов из Quizlet:
Comprobar — проверять
Vigilar — следить
Deshacerse de — избавляться
Alcanzar — достиг…
В испанском у меня есть слова, которые никак не хотят запоминаться.
Хотя я пытаюсь, но потом на уроке: «Ой, как будет «проверить»? Опять забыла, ну учила же»
Кстати, как будет? 😁 Это слово было в Quizlet на прошлой неделе.
Я послушала, как носители употребляют:
En un futuro cercano
Alcanzar
En cualquier caso
(Эти слова из предыдущего поста)
Скидываю вам по примерчику. Качайте *хотела сказать listening 😂😂* восприятие речи на слух вместе со мной.
И еще сделала себе Quizlet с новыми словами с сегодняшнего урока. Там есть очень полезные — «избавляться», «доверять». Пользуйтесь :)
Пока на этом останавливаюсь, но на днях продолжу тренир…
Давайте попробуем познакомиться и немного пообщаться :)
¿Por qué estudiáis español? ¿Habéis viajado a España?
Estudio español porque me interesa aprender idiomas. He viajado a España dos veces y la segunda vez hablé un poco. España es muy bonita y antes quería vivir allí. Ahora vivo en Chipre y no voy a viajar a España en un futuro cercano pero quiero alcanzar el nivel C1 en cualquier caso.
Soy profesora de inglés…
Это канал для тех, кто хочет кайфово и регулярно изучать испанский, найти партнёров для практики и свободно практиковаться без страха совершать ошибки.
¡Hola, amigos! Меня зовут Александра, я преподаватель английского и писатель.
Ещё я учу испанский, мой уровень начальный B1.
Однако, моих индивидуальных уроков мне мало, а дисциплины на самостоятельную работу ещё меньше 🌝
Пока я не нашла испанские онлайн-клубы или…
❤2
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @alexspeaksspanish. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 29 October 2025 to 3 December 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Mentions
Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@alexspeaksspanish named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@spanishalexspeaks named in 1 post, 12 August 2026 – 12 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Испанский дневник AlexSpeaks” (@alexspeaksspanish), 22 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/alexspeaksspanish.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.